Correct this is exactly what I meant
I'd say they're about even in terms of coldness, with maybe my take being a little hotter by virtue of there still being a lot of people willing to defend ai. With gacha games even those that play them (which I would never ever do) will usually admit they are pretty exploitative
And I glad they are. But honestly, I kinda feel bad for some (not every) ai bros. They try to push some "unusual" opinions out of spite, out of sheer mysanthropy some people may have caused in them (they could be bullied, abused in the past and etc), some are even form bonds with ai, only because people hated and rejected them or even worse - they thought they were, while it wasn't the caseCorrect this is exactly what I meant
I'd say they're about even in terms of coldness, with maybe my take being a little hotter by virtue of there still being a lot of people willing to defend ai. With gacha games even those that play them (which I would never ever do) will usually admit they are pretty exploitative
I think it has to do more with ego and the feeling of being on the casp of some big technological advancment (when in reality they are just promoting a start up called PoopyShitPeeAI67)
Pretty sure they are way more common than those who I described. I just kind of get such image of them through lots of videos like "reacting to r/defendingAI", where some of them seem to be miserable. And I also have a friend, who was way too socially reliant on AI out of loneliness and overall society being way too hostile towards them for nothing but existing (I'm glad they are overcame that addiction and now became way more social)
Ah I see what the problem here is. It comes down to simple difference in platforms you see, on Twitter everyone is an egoistic grifter while on Reddit everyone is suicidally depressed so naturally the ai bros of each site will reflect thus
tung tung tung sahur
The only benefits that can PROBABLY come out of it is AI doing tasks faster or more easily than humans + probably being capable of storing and transmitting more data and accessing more parts of the Internet simultaneously faster than humans could + machines possibly performing better than humans in certain aspects of life like intelligence, strength, speed, lifespan/span of existence, etc (That's if we let them also automate machines that are currently controlled by humanity) but all these are most likely outweighed by the detriments you stated they have.
There is a strong double standard here sadly. What is supposed to be the most obvious choice is somehow complicated for no good reason. Shame.
Get them hahahhahaa
By the way, we're bringing aimbots to real life.The only benefits that can PROBABLY come out of it is AI doing tasks faster or more easily than humans + probably being capable of storing and transmitting more data and accessing more parts of the Internet simultaneously faster than humans could + machines possibly performing better than humans in certain aspects of life like intelligence, strength, speed, lifespan/span of existence, etc (That's if we let them also automate machines that are currently controlled by humanity) but all these are most likely outweighed by the detriments you stated they have.
Kinda ironic in a way, in the process of trying to make stuff that can surpass it and make life easier for it, humanity is screwing itself over and potentially screwing all of life over as well.
I genuinely would want to discuss more with you in general about life (and probably also the Universe as a whole) cause I want to know what your thoughts are on other living beings and other existing stuff beyond humanity and what could be in store for Earth and the rest of the Universe as well.
People already made timelines for not just the past and present but also the potential future on Wikipedia welp.
Timelines of the future - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Honestly feel like other living beings (at least a few certain types of them) can technically be considered more successful than humans in certain ways (population, size, ability to survive otherwise inhospitable environments, lifespan, etc etc)... and technically even our own creations, scientific or artistic, are inherently also made out of resources from Earth and the Universe and will thus possibly outlive us all too.
Additionally all of life, including humanity, despite our abilities, is ultimately still dependent on Nature or Earth itself as well as the Universe as a whole. (All that we have created is ultimately us merely utilising Nature's/Earth's resources which in turn are technically generated by the Universe itself, and conversely, there's very little we can do to stop natural events, let alone cosmic events, from significantly affecting our existence or even determining whether we continue to exist or are destroyed.)
Instead of blindly being nihilist or anthropocentric, I'd want to believe we should be trying to figure out how to make the state of existence of all that coexists alongside us (or, for now, given our limitations, the lives of all other living beings alongside humanity at least) better.
Honestly a permaban would be better for him as well. That stream of messages on his wall was genuinely disturbing, the dude clearly has some issues and being allowed back in here will probably only make it worse
Who is vapourr and what have he done?
Check RVR
What is RVR?
the rule violation report thread
Wait, is this Vzearr?
It all started ages ago when he joined the wiki and started scaling Tokyo Revengers and Lookism. He made bs calcs that made no sense and wanked the verses hard, though his main focus was on TR. He was incredibly rude and used fallacies like no other so he got banned eventually.
I'm disappointed in him, he seemed pretty chill when I talked to him and thought he just lost his temper one time in RVR, but unfortunately it was a pattern
He's either a pathalogical liar or a deeply troubled person. Either way, he shouldn't be here.
Probably both
As a software engineer who use VSCode for his work, AI does actually lessen my workloads. No longer you would need to search some random and hard to search Stack Overflow thread for your problems, CoPilot often give a solution (not always optimal but still can be built upon and optimized by myself) that works.
Fair enough, obv AI has a lot of positive uses that I am simply unaware of but as a whole I think it's fair to say it's been a massive net-negative on the world
I think generative AI may be a massive net-negative, but it's also worth pointing out that it's been revolutionary in various scientific and medical fields.
I know that much, which is why I specified gen AI in my first post
I didn't read your first post.
How dare youI didn't read your first post.
The obnoxious part is that AI can be an incredibly valuable tool for the right work, like managing corpus, organizing data, analyzing information, etc.
Wario type opinion
He would've given it a 0/10 (not that that's a bad opinion tbh)
For the record, people spamming memes on CRTs is something you can tell staff about, it's derailing.
The latest thread involving that did get that treatment. Previous threads didn't even when staff were involved, I'll definitely let staff know the next time that happens for any thread
Certain staff are, let's say, less strict than others. Or perhaps just less willing to pull the trigger.
Sure I'll ask on your wall and on RVR
Because, you know, it's so hard to scale a character/verse that don't gives a shit about consistency, logic, continuity and etc and just does things because he can/can't do it at the moment. It's also makes them more interesting, since things IRL is not really consistent either. On a good day you could do 10x more than average, and at worst you could even barely leave your bedroom since you got sick/tired/don't feel like it, so I think there's nothing bad if we scale inconsistent/toon force characters in ranges, rather than one specific tier
