Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes that's also a point but apart from that, In the series, those same charecters or in-fact faster charecters are clearly getting tracked by NORMAL CAMERAS, Which aren't even ultra-slow motion one which the calc assumes and that didn't just happened once but multiple times, in-fact we literally got showings of literally the fastest charecter in the verse getting tracked by a normal cctv camera.The calculation assumes that every distance moved is faster then a high speed camera. When the distance varies, the speed varies, the timeframe varies, etc.
There's legit no transonic or supersonic feats. Check the profile if u want.I agree about discarding the HHS and MHS calculations from the verse, since due to our current guidelines, these calculations would be wrong anyway.
Regarding the mentioned anti-feats, I'd say I don't quite agree; Alipede isn't enough when there are more transonic/supersonic feats, like Peter's and Sang-woo's Mach cones (this is VERY early on).
Killer Peter speed calculations are so stupid, they are subsonic and suddenly it goes to mach 39, i completely agree all of it should be taken out directly to subsonic or transonic (if the mach cones Arthur_Nando444 mentioned are valid)There's legit no transonic or supersonic feats. Check the profile if u want.
None of these implies, states or proves mach speed, buddy. That's not how it works.
I did recalc it to Subsonic+ using the new ang-size method but it hasn't been evaluated.None of these implies, states or proves mach speed, buddy. That's not how it works.
Also, Simon cutting the bullet was calced at subsonic.
You didn't quite understand my point about Simon.None of these implies, states or proves mach speed, buddy. That's not how it works.
Also, Simon cutting the bullet was calced at subsonic.
It's not necessary to explicitly state whether a strike is supersonic or not; the topic itself cites a calculation from Attack on Titan of a feat by the Titan throwing a rock, assuming supersonic speed due to the Mach wave, even if it's not explicitly stated. So yes, it is possible to assert that such a supersonic object is based on its Mach wave without having a direct statement.I did recalc it to Subsonic+ using the new ang-size method but it hasn't been evaluated.
Also (a reply to another comment), pretty sure mach cones require a statement for it to be a legitimate mach cone (thread here). I'd assume it's the same for a mach wave
alot of non supersonic verses have the same cones. it shouldnt be indicative of supersonic speed.You didn't quite understand my point about Simon.
Simon's feat regarding the speed of the bullet (even if the calculation is wrong) is subsonic, but what I mean is the way the bullet is portrayed. The shot is clearly supersonic and appears to cause Mach waves, and the artistic way it's depicted is extremely similar to the fight between Sang Woo and Peter. Even Yukia did similar things, so I conclude that they are genuine Mach waves.
It's not necessary to explicitly state whether a strike is supersonic or not; the topic itself cites a calculation from Attack on Titan of a feat by the Titan throwing a rock, assuming supersonic speed due to the Mach wave, even if it's not explicitly stated.
That depends on how it's portrayed. In this case, the waves that Peter and Sang-woo create are similar, or even identical, to the waves created by the bullet that Simon passes through (an object that is clearly traveling at supersonic speeds), so I would say it's plausible to consider them supersonic.alot of non supersonic verses have the same cones. it shouldnt be indicative of supersonic speed.
1. Idk what ur even talking about. It's literally accepted at subsonic and ur somehow claiming it's supersonic.You didn't quite understand my point about Simon.
Simon's feat regarding the speed of the bullet (even if the calculation is wrong) is subsonic, but what I mean is the way the bullet is portrayed. The shot is clearly supersonic and appears to cause Mach waves, and the artistic way it's depicted is extremely similar to the fight between Sang Woo and Peter. Even Yukia did similar things, so I conclude that they are genuine Mach waves
It's not necessary to explicitly state whether a strike is supersonic or not; the topic itself cites a calculation from Attack on Titan of a feat by the Titan throwing a rock, assuming supersonic speed due to the Mach wave, even if it's not explicitly stated. So yes, it is possible to assert that such a supersonic object is based on its Mach wave without having a direct statement.
this presupposes that the portrayals are similar (they arent) ones a solid cone and the other looks like light gusts. even levan whos > the character being shown by alot considered bullet speed catching inhuman while drug amped. especially since the verse has showcase abominable anti feats and stated they cant move out the way of shotguns as a top tier (which peter needed to move 2 meters before a shotgun bullet moved the same distance) etc etc. this verse doesnt have enough consistent good feats to get A tiers that highThat depends on how it's portrayed. In this case, the waves that Peter and Sang-woo create are similar, or even identical, to the waves created by the bullet that Simon passes through (an object that is clearly traveling at supersonic speeds), so I would say it's plausible to consider them supersonic.
1 - don't know if you have serious interpretation problems or if you're not reading what I'm saying. I'm saying that THE BULLET IS TRAVELING AT SUPERSONIC SPEEDS, and I'm using the way it's portrayed as an argument. The "subsonic" part refers to Simon's estimated speed for cutting the bullet, something unrelated to what I want to say.1. Idk what ur even talking about. It's literally accepted at subsonic and ur somehow claiming it's supersonic.
2 - It's up to the verse's defenders and members of the calculation groups to say whether it's still usable or not. If it's remained for so long, it's because nobody realized it was wrong, but it's still there and I can use it as an argument until they say otherwise.2. The second calc is extremely old and can be taken down if a crt is made against it.
1. Cool. That's just an artistic effect. Also your first scan doens't prove mach wave.1 - don't know if you have serious interpretation problems or if you're not reading what I'm saying. I'm saying that THE BULLET IS TRAVELING AT SUPERSONIC SPEEDS, and I'm using the way it's portrayed as an argument. The "subsonic" part refers to Simon's estimated speed for cutting the bullet, something unrelated to what I want to say.
2 - It's up to the verse's defenders and members of the calculation groups to say whether it's still usable or not. If it's remained for so long, it's because nobody realized it was wrong, but it's still there and I can use it as an argument until they say otherwise.
I realize I was wrong about that, so Peter Assassin should be downgraded to subsonic+.1. Cool. That's just an artistic effect. Also your first scan doens't prove mach wave.
2. I don't see any reason on why it can't be taken down when sonic booms have already been discussed in a crt. Which clearly states that it requires statement.
Yeah makes sense, btw you should get the calced evaluated.However, I recently recalculated Thadeus's feat, from HHS to transonic, and he also has other feats that could improve the scale, but, that being said, the universe currently has the maximum scale for transonic speed.
I've already asked for evaluations, and now I'm just waiting for someone to validate these feats; for now, the best result I've obtained is Mach 5 for the Sang-woo.Yeah makes sense, btw you should get the calced evaluated.
I don't wanna divert the topic here but that Sang woo calc is like genuinely bad. And speaking of the knife calc then my problem regarding it remains the same, both shouldn't work.I've already asked for evaluations, and now I'm just waiting for someone to validate these feats; for now, the best result I've obtained is Mach 5 for the Sang-woo.
Mods ain't checkingBump...(Mods pls check)
We should just hang BlackCat for giving the whole verse the speed upgrade in Killer Peter Major Speed Upgrade 2 broBump...(Mods pls check)
![]()
You answer your own question just after this, in a sense
I do not have the telepathy required to discern something like this is inconsistent with other showings in universe, and as much as my ID would enjoy the idea of just telling people "no" and roundhouse kicking them in the pelvis, not feeling up to it isn't very actionable for a calc group member beyond just choosing to not do anything (which would be rude if there was genuine validity)
Anyways that seems to be the crux of this issue so I don't have a lot to say, besides the fact I do not like Manhwa and will not be caught dead discussing 99% of them, especially with the jive-type rhetoric that often seems to be used in these threads. Unfollowing.
They absolutely are if they are consistent enough. Key word there being "enough", which is case by case.Anti-feats are usually not a solid grounds for downgrading.
Yeah, I wouldn't accept that statement at face value without plenty of supporting evidence. If that's the only feat at that level, downgrade is definitely in order.Now at first lemme give you some context behind this feat or i should say, statement. Though I'm a bit bad at wording and explaining stuff so don't mind me but anyways I'll be trying my best to explain the context:
According to these scans, which ways that "Matthias's sleigh of hand is lighting fast, to the point that even an ultra-slow motion camera cannot capture it". Now with the context of this statement known the calc was made and the results got around Mach 500.
Nope. Needs another mod approval.As far as i can see, most people are agreeing with the downgrade including an admin.
So this thread should be concluded here ig and the verse should be downgraded to subsonic.
@BlackCat
He also says that if he leaves the room, a bullet traveling at 400 m/s will hit him.Sheesh
They absolutely are if they are consistent enough. Key word there being "enough", which is case by case.
Yeah, I wouldn't accept that statement at face value without plenty of supporting evidence. If that's the only feat at that level, downgrade is definitely in order.
Random_Helper was technically neutral I believe so you need another staff approval. Non-staff approval's (i.e. us) don't usually mean anything besides convincing staff member themselves for votes. Once the 2 staff votes get accepted though, there is also a 24-hour grace period (for CRT's, I rarely ever see it interrupted) and once that period ends, then we can apply (or in this case, remove) the results.As far as i can see, most people are agreeing with the downgrade including an admin.
So this thread should be concluded here ig and the verse should be downgraded to subsonic.
@BlackCat
No. The 24 hrs grace is for self evident changes. For normal threads is 48 hrs.Random_Helper was technically neutral I believe so you need another staff approval. Non-staff approval's (i.e. us) don't usually mean anything besides convincing staff member themselves for votes. Once the 2 staff votes get accepted though, there is also a 24-hour grace period and once that period ends, then we can apply (or in this case, remove) the results.
Oops, misread the grace rules. Good to know it starts when the thread is posted. TyNo. The 24 hrs grace is for self evident changes. For normal threads is 48 hrs.
And it starts the moment the thread is posted.We are at over 720 hrs at this point
Once another mod approves, it can be immediately applied.
Random helper said that he'll wait and see what others say so he might change his neutral decision. If not then we'll need to wait for another staff.Random_Helper was technically neutral I believe so you need another staff approval. Non-staff approval's (i.e. us) don't usually mean anything besides convincing staff member themselves for votes. Once the 2 staff votes get accepted though, there is also a 24-hour grace period (for CRT's, I rarely ever see it interrupted) and once that period ends, then we can apply (or in this case, remove) the results.