-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
How emanators fooled the internet (hsr emanator downgrade) (mods needed)
- Thread starter Mbpoops
- Start date
- Status
- 5,517
- 6,687
Which part implies this again…? I’m really not getting your argument
Mbpoops
He/Him- 8,437
- 7,647
- Thread starter
- #483
I misremembered what you said earlier so thats my bad. I mean i guess we could say its just a pocket dimension on a higher dimension which im fine with tbh. Low 1-C real space should be changed to 2-A, SoE should be changed to the stuff earlier, high potency gravity manip (or dimensional manip idk) and 3-B higher from scaling to welt. Question though, would this give welt hde 5D?
- 7,278
- 6,751
so like, why is ryusuke even higher dimensional then? the entire context was literally that entire space was higher dimensional, which ryusuke managed to merge with as he was omnipresent across entire space, and the moment welt used powers that allowed him to affect all dimensions he destroyed both ryusuke and the space including the key itself. if he rly is just higher D there without counting entire alien space then i even disagree with idea to give him low 2-C HDE since HDE would just be his state of existence and he could literally be 10-B in stats
- 5,517
- 6,687
It only said he could perceive it. Not exist in it. He beat Ryusuke using hax and not physicality.
2-A for Hi3, but in HSR context’s it’ll be Low 2-C.
It’s js HDE. Unless you can prove Ryusuke’s dimension specifically is infinite.
- 5,517
- 6,687
I’ll make a thread on this myself. It should stay Low 1-C for now.
If it’s above Real Space, it can js be 11D HDE ngl
- 5,517
- 6,687
On that note, since we’re not cross-scaling to Scepters, make sure mfs don’t cross-scale to its speed either.
- 5,517
- 6,687
I’m saying the specific Scepter has a specific speed (entire galaxy is a nanosecond), so make sure mfs don’t actually scale to this value
- 5,779
- 2,362
We can add this to the verse page scaling section
- 5,517
- 6,687
Yes thats the entire point. Since, again, we have specific anti-feats regarding its UES. The AP is galaxy level, but its durability is worth 24 planets
- 7,278
- 6,751
actually scepters dont even use img energy nor honkai energy as far as i know, so there shoudlnt even be UES If you ask me. Only irontomb qualifies for this as hes lord ravager
- 5,517
- 6,687
Only born Irontomb, which I alr accept since we have feats of his UES working
- 5,517
- 6,687
Mr. Mbpoops… we will save Hoyoverse Society…
- 5,517
- 6,687
What I’ve been telling ya’ll for months, but nobody heeded my calls.
- 5,517
- 6,687
They prob scale to Elysia’s feat, otherwise it’s js Zephyro blowing up planets.
The ones below this also should have some FTL feats, like Welt iirc
- 5,517
- 6,687
Who would scale to Elysia really
- 7,278
- 6,751
Just hi3 chars, cross scaling is like impossible bcs of this chain scaling being removed and welt is below her anyway
- 5,517
- 6,687
Aigh. So I assume we have:
Aeons > Khaslana > Elysia ~ High tier Hi3 > HSR
Aeons > Khaslana > Elysia ~ High tier Hi3 > HSR
- 5,517
- 6,687
That’s fine by me then. Seems aigh to apply it like this then.
- 5,366
- 2,829
It's still 3-B, nothing in this thread tries to remotely debunk my 3-B thread anyway;
We're using 3-B off Asdana Galaxy, there's several implications that Emanators can affect the entirety of said galaxy with some straight up destroying the cosmos (Low 1-C). MFTL+ also stays because again; If you covered the entire Asdana Galaxy in a nanosecond, 63 sextillion times faster than light is the result that you'd get which is proven by Acheron especially when Acheron affecting the Dreamscape spreads it to the entire galaxy (UES makes this scale to combat speed). I haven't even mentioned the multiplier used in my 3-B thread which wouldn't make this 3-C at all in the slightest, since we are using the in-game sizes and it's stated star systems in here are literally massively bigger than Milky Way then there's no reason to even use Milky Way as the baseline at the very least. And we also know that Emanators reactions and perceptions are in the nanosecond timeframe in the Amphoreus arc.
Honestly before this is even applied, I'd require to make another thread regarding my 3-B thread and the Low 1-C cosmology as a whole lol (and don't argue semantics).
Basically, all Emanators who are shown to destroy the cosmos entirely retains their full Low 1-C rating instead of it being via Path, Emanators who aren't is 3-B via them at the very least capable of incinerating multiple galaxies (which again is in the nanosecond timeframe) and said multiple galaxies being massively larger than Milky Way.
We're using 3-B off Asdana Galaxy, there's several implications that Emanators can affect the entirety of said galaxy with some straight up destroying the cosmos (Low 1-C). MFTL+ also stays because again; If you covered the entire Asdana Galaxy in a nanosecond, 63 sextillion times faster than light is the result that you'd get which is proven by Acheron especially when Acheron affecting the Dreamscape spreads it to the entire galaxy (UES makes this scale to combat speed). I haven't even mentioned the multiplier used in my 3-B thread which wouldn't make this 3-C at all in the slightest, since we are using the in-game sizes and it's stated star systems in here are literally massively bigger than Milky Way then there's no reason to even use Milky Way as the baseline at the very least. And we also know that Emanators reactions and perceptions are in the nanosecond timeframe in the Amphoreus arc.
Honestly before this is even applied, I'd require to make another thread regarding my 3-B thread and the Low 1-C cosmology as a whole lol (and don't argue semantics).
Basically, all Emanators who are shown to destroy the cosmos entirely retains their full Low 1-C rating instead of it being via Path, Emanators who aren't is 3-B via them at the very least capable of incinerating multiple galaxies (which again is in the nanosecond timeframe) and said multiple galaxies being massively larger than Milky Way.
Mbpoops
He/Him- 8,437
- 7,647
- Thread starter
- #513
3-B is fine since asdana is a really big galaxy ngl
son
the problem with this is the sceptor doesnt use the UES
i mean yea acheron would scale to asdanaa which is 3-B and her speed would also scale (idk what the calc would be ngl)
only lygus has nanosecond persception because he views 2 different space-times at the same time
low 1-C cosmology needs to go
- 5,366
- 2,829
There's already a calc for it, it's the Scepter one, if you affect the entire Asdana Galaxy then you get 3-B and MFTL+, it's this simple and you know Acheron doing this would scale it to combat speed since it's actually UES3-B is fine since asdana is a really big galaxy ngl
son
the problem with this is the sceptor doesnt use the UES
i mean yea acheron would scale to asdanaa which is 3-B and her speed would also scale (idk what the calc would be ngl)
only lygus has nanosecond persception because he views 2 different space-times at the same time
low 1-C cosmology needs to go
All Emanators have nanosecond perception, viewing 2 different space-times at the same time isn't even nanosecond perception but straight up Infinite lol
Not to mention, Low 1-C via Path is still staying
- 5,517
- 6,687
- Status
Similar threads
