DMC wank or something idk

[EddisherSound]

yes please

It's open

 

[Random-Helper323]

yes please

Unlocked. Let me know when you've made the edits, okay?

 

[Tony_di_bugalu]

Okay, thanks.

 

[Apotheosis69]

It says Nobodies lack a Name, in which Names in DmC is Concept Type 1. So for NEP, shouldn't they have Aspect 2?

 

[Tony_di_bugalu]

Argosax

Argosax the Chaos was a powerful Demon God who once waged a great war in ancient times against Mundus and conquered half of the Underworld, splitting the devil kingdom in two sides. After the defeat of Mundus at Sparda's hands and the sealing of the netherworld, Argosax conquered the other half...

vsbattles.fandom.com

Profile updated

It says Nobodies lack a Name, in which Names in DmC is Concept Type 1. So for NEP, shouldn't they have Aspect 2?

**** me I forgot about that

A new thread should be made regarding that little BIG ASS DETAIL

I'm dumb

 

[Tanin_iver]

Argosax

Argosax the Chaos was a powerful Demon God who once waged a great war in ancient times against Mundus and conquered half of the Underworld, splitting the devil kingdom in two sides. After the defeat of Mundus at Sparda's hands and the sealing of the netherworld, Argosax conquered the other half...

vsbattles.fandom.com

Profile updated


**** me I forgot about that

A new thread should be made regarding that little BIG ASS DETAIL

I'm dumb

Why not handle that when handling High Godly?

 

[Apotheosis69]

**** me I forgot about that

A new thread should be made regarding that little BIG ASS DETAIL

I'm dumb

I mean it's incredibly self-evident. I don't see a problem with putting that there, especially when the evidence is in the justification. But oh well, if you want, you can just put that as a small thing for the High-Godly thread

 

[Vietthai96]

It says Nobodies lack a Name, in which Names in DmC is Concept Type 1. So for NEP, shouldn't they have Aspect 2?

No, unless Sargassos also lack name, which it isn't from what i can see. Nobodies lack name but not nonexistent. Idk why it is also in Argosax NEP justification and somehow implies Argosax have NEP which also lack name

 

[Tanin_iver]

No, unless Sargassos also lack name, which it isn't from what i can see. Nobodies lack name but not nonexistent. Idk why it is also in Argosax NEP justification and somehow implies Argosax have NEP which also lack name

Demons should in general have unconventional Conceptual invulnerability as they can exist without their Names/ Concepts but only something like Nobodies should by default have NEP for Names

 

[Vietthai96]

Demons should in general have unconventional Conceptual invulnerability as they can exist without their Names/ Concepts but only something like Nobodies should by default have NEP for Names

No, lacking concept doesn't grant you NEP

 

[Hecky2222]

No, lacking concept doesn't grant you NEP

it does only if concept you have is necessary for your existence

 

[Vietthai96]

it does only if concept you have is necessary for your existence

You need to be nonexistent first before we talking about Aspects

 

[SuperSonicTL]

You need to be nonexistent first before we talking about Aspects

I heard being incorporeal works too. For example, an entity who is abstract and stated to lack soul gives them supposedly NEP of that type. Can you elaborate on that part?

 

[Vietthai96]

I heard being incorporeal works too. For example, an entity who is abstract and stated to lack soul gives them supposedly NEP of that type. Can you elaborate on that part?

Where did you heard this?. Being abstract mean it is still exist in some way, so lacking a soul or a mind doesn't mean you are NEP, of course being concept of nothingness/nonexistence is a completely a different thing

 

[Hecky2222]

Where did you heard this?. Being abstract mean it is still exist in some way, so lacking a soul or a mind doesn't mean you are NEP, of course being concept of nothingness/nonexistence is a completely a different thing

I think he was asking "if one has AE1 based on soul but lacks soul also, wouldn't that mean NEP"

Though I am not sure

 

[Tanin_iver]

No, lacking concept doesn't grant you NEP

So like if a character that doesn't have a soul, concept, info, a narrative aspect doesn't have NEP 1 in either aspect because?
I mean I know physically non-existent is just incorporeal, but lacking in other aspects doesn't count as NEP? When did that happen?

 

[Thermor]

I think if the character itself isn't nonexistent but their aspects do, instead of NEP, it can be indexed as immunities.

 

[Thermor]

I think he was asking "if one has AE1 based on soul but lacks soul also, wouldn't that mean NEP"

Though I am not sure

Oh so like a soul lacking a soul? I think thats NEP.

 

[Vietthai96]

I think if the character itself isn't nonexistent but their aspects do, instead of NEP, it can be indexed as immunities.

This is correct, we have been doing this for years

I think he was asking "if one has AE1 based on soul but lacks soul also, wouldn't that mean NEP

You could probably get NEP, but then you wouldn't be AE1 to begin with

 

[Thermor]

This is correct, we have been doing this for years

You could probably get NEP, but then you wouldn't be AE1 to begin with

I think AE1 wants to be indexed because a character with normal nep interaction, cant effect it unless their NEP NPI includes aspect 1 (as the nonexistent character in question exists as a nep soul, not a nep body).

 

[Tanin_iver]

I think if the character itself isn't nonexistent but their aspects do, instead of NEP, it can be indexed as immunities.

This is correct, we have been doing this for years

Difference between what character is non-existent and what isn't non-existent, especially differentiate between lacking/not existing aspect vs non-existent aspects?

Also, this thread should probably be closed if the edits are done.

 

[Random-Helper323]

I would have closed it but it seemed as though people were discussing adding things to it, so I wasn't sure if it was concluded.

 

[Tony_di_bugalu]

I would have closed it but it seemed as though people were discussing adding things to it, so I wasn't sure if it was concluded.

nah close it, OP was very specific on the abilities to add and staff agreed to that, adding more abilities after the thread was concluded and the profile edited is not only a waste of time but also kinda scummy so if someone wants to do it then can make a thread for it later

 

[Random-Helper323]

nah close it, OP was very specific on the abilities to add and staff agreed to that, adding more abilities after the thread was concluded and the profile edited is not only a waste of time but also kinda scummy so if someone wants to do it then can make a thread for it later

More inefficient and annoying than scummy, given that it'd require fresh votes on the newly introduced abilities. But yeah, closing now.