• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Blood Demon Art: Infinite Discussion (A Kimetsu No Yaiba Discussion Thread)

Databook statement calling it an order of magnitude increase.
Firstly can give me a link or an image i could look at to verify its real at all.

Secondly why is it 10x specifically, Wouldn't a statement as a vague as that be unusable? Plus i looked at the requirements on the Multipliers page would one statement from a Data Book really be sufficient.
 
Firstly can give me a link or an image i could look at to verify its real at all.
Sure, here is the related sandbox that got approved in this CRT.

Secondly why is it 10x specifically, Wouldn't a statement as a vague as that be unusable? Plus i looked at the requirements on the Multipliers page would one statement from a Data Book really be sufficient.
Because that is what order of magnitude means. At least a 10x difference.
 
Ok fair, But as i said would one statement from a Data Book really be sufficient given the regulations for multipliers?
I mean the main sticking point for the multipliers page is internal consistency. The statement comes from an approved source, the main issue to any multiplier getting accepted (as discussed on the multipliers page) is whether or not it should be considered hyperbolic based on the actual demonstrated feats.

In the case of Demon Slayer, the DSM is consistently treated as a big boost, so the positive case for it is solid. The main anti-feat I would consider would be the case of Mitsuri, who got her DSM mid-battle with Zohakuten and continued to fight it out in a stall battle. Although it has been argued that after Mitsuri unlocked her DSM we get a statement from Urami that Zohakuten was now dedicating too much power from their collective reserve to fight off Mitsuri, which indicates he likely wasn’t fully committing all his energy prior. Of course Zohakuten is also unkillable at that point so Mitsuri winning outright isn’t expected even with a big stat boost, although the counter-argument would be her being able to keep up similarly prior to unlocking the DSM.

So up to interpretation, although currently accepted based on the otherwise pretty consistent portrayal of a big stat boost across different characters when unlocking it.
 
Last edited:
I mean the main sticking point for the multipliers page is internal consistency. The statement comes from an approved source, the main issue to any multiplier getting accepted (as discussed on the multipliers page) is whether or not it should be considered hyperbolic based on the actual demonstrated feats.

In the case of Demon Slayer, the DSM is consistently treated as a big boost, so the positive case for it is solid. The main anti-feat I would consider would be the case of Mitsuri, who got her DSM mid-battle with Zohakuten and continued to fight it out in a stall battle. Although it has been argued that after Mitsuri unlocked her DSM we get a statement from Urami that Zohaluten was now dedicating too much power from their collective reserve to fight off Mitsuri, which indicates he likely wasn’t fully committing all his energy prior. Of course Zohakuten is also unkillable at that point so Mitsuri winning outright isn’t expected even with a big stat boost, although the counter-argument would be her being able to keep up similarly prior to unlocking the DSM.

So up to interpretation, although currently accepted based on the otherwise pretty consistent portrayal of a big stat boost across different characters when unlocking it.
I guess thats fair. Honestly if it were up to me i would definently make regulations for multipliers much stricter.
 
The main anti-feat I would consider would be the case of Mitsuri, who got her DSM mid-battle with Zohakuten and continued to fight it out in a stall battle. Although it has been argued that after Mitsuri unlocked her DSM we get a statement from Urami that Zohaluten was now dedicating too much power from their collective reserve to fight off Mitsuri, which indicates he likely wasn’t fully committing all his energy prior. Of course Zohakuten is also unkillable at that point so Mitsuri winning outright isn’t expected even with a big stat boost, although the counter-argument would be her being able to keep up similarly prior to unlocking the DSM.
Honestly, nowadays even Mitsuri's counter-argument isn't valid anymore. Mitsuri in her base form could handle Zohakuten with her technique/attack speed using her whip sword (which is cited as being especially faster, being said to be superior to Uzui's), but she was knocked out by a sonic attack from Zohakuten, who even stated he could crush her skull with a single punch. However, when she activates her DSM, Mitsuri can dodge Zohakuten's Dragons with her movement speed (and even blitz them with that speed), and literally withstands attacks from her Dragons with physical strength, in addition to, as already mentioned, forcing Zohakuten to use more power (BDA) to become stronger, which left the other clone with weakened regeneration.
 
i made a new matchup:
 
i dont know if its just me but most of the scans aren't working
 
i dont know if its just me but most of the scans aren't working
Same here, just getting “origin unreachable” for most of the links.

@Catbowtie Want to take a look at this?
 
 
Chalk it up to less than half baked crt number 4
 
Back
Top