- 52,605
- 46,829
And before you accuse me of not having those same standards, if I didn't, Malygos would be out already. 250 spells is LIGHT. *******. WORK. try over ten thousand.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sounds like somebody's got a lot of writing to do then.Player's main equipment is gloves... 250 of them and counting to be exact. In word form, that's two hundred fifty.
Kinda yeah. How else is anybody supposed to make sense of the profile?That's more abilities than any profile on this site. And you want me to explain all of the abilities one by one? I don't think so.
you honestly should explain all 250 gloves.The absolute bare minimum that I can do is that in the Notable Attacks/Techniques section, I can place down a couple of oneshot gloves and powerful gloves and some super notable abilities like emby did here. But I'm not explaining all 250 damn gloves. The wiki pages can do that themselves. That's just a mountain of bytes that are just gonna be there for no damn reason.
Actually, I lied, it's only three thousand two hunded eighty five spells.And before you accuse me of not having those same standards, if I didn't, Malygos would be out already. 250 spells is LIGHT. *******. WORK. try over ten thousand.
So sensitive but whatever. Working on them now.
You do know there's this thing called blogs, right? Copy the profile to one and slowly make your way up. Work that takes long is better than work that is half-assed.I'm legit working on the profile now. Tabbers are for another day but I'll just very briefly explain the abilities next to the hyperlinked abilities. How about it.
what are we doing atp? lolthree thousand two hunded eighty five spells
The profile currently seems fine to me. It could get some improvements in some parts, but these are minor issues, so it's not enough to delete it.
What does this mean?except there’s more to what’s on the surface
Youtuber personas shold be in FCOC anyway.
Unfinished profile
I always makes sure to get some verse supporter's input before deleting any profile as a precaution.As the only who is working in Devilman profiles, I will ask to nuke the following one
It didn't fight at all and its abilities were never explained. It's just a few panels guy, and it's another dogass profile.
Not really. I have a long overdue CRT that's still in the works for the verse, anyway.
@YmTheSuperRedirected the Bolt (Invincible) page to the Bolt (Image Comics) one since that seems like the naming convention for the verse. (it's also the one linked to in the verse page)
I think both work to some degree, using "(Comics)" to indicate that these are the characters from the Invincible comics or using "(Image Comics)" to indicate that these are the characters from the comics which are published by Image Comics, although yeah I agree that using "(Comics)" is probably better, less confusing and more convenient, with "(Invincible Comics)" being used for characters that have an overlap in names with others from other franchises.@YmTheSuper
I am not sure if that is a good idea, as "Image Comics" is not remotely a coherent verse, just a publishing company.
Wouldn't it be a better approach to replace "(Image Comics)" in the page titles for characters from the "Invincible" comicbook verse with just "(Comics)" instead?
Bump?On a similar basis I also propose to delete the following profiles:
They scaling from the Sentinels could be questionable as they were easily killed by them and it would only be through their powers and not their physical stats, plus I don't think anyone would be willing to update their profiles properly. I also think that the profile of Sebastian Shaw (FOX) should be deleted since it's poorly done and all of his stats are guesswork
I think in this case it would be best to add the outdated template to these pages since I believe that we don't deleted very old pages for being low quality or outdated.On a similar basis I also propose to delete the following profiles:
They scaling from the Sentinels could be questionable as they were easily killed by them and it would only be through their powers and not their physical stats, plus I don't think anyone would be willing to update their profiles properly.
Yeah I deleted this one since the statistics are entirely guesswork.I also think that the profile of Sebastian Shaw (FOX) should be deleted since it's poorly done and all of his stats are guesswork
The issue is that I'm virtually the only active supporter of the verse since a few years, so I don't think the profiles will ever be updated (nothing has happened to them in over a year since I requested their deletion), and I'm not interested in them at all. Besides, them scaling from the Sentinels is iffy since they were easily killed by them and could only do a little with their powers, so their physical stats shouldn't even scale from them. The profiles aren't just outdated and barebones/incomplete, they're also inaccurateI think in this case it would be best to add the outdated template to these pages since I believe that we don't deleted very old pages for being low quality or outdated.
Redirected the Bolt (Invincible) page to the Bolt (Image Comics) one since that seems like the naming convention for the verse. (it's also the one linked to in the verse page)
@YmTheSuper
I am not sure if that is a good idea, as "Image Comics" is not remotely a coherent verse, just a publishing company.
Wouldn't it be a better approach to replace "(Image Comics)" in the page titles for characters from the "Invincible" comicbook verse with just "(Comics)" instead?
For the record, I do have a major Spawn CRT still in the works which goes over the canonicity of the verse in regards to others, and I also plan on making a proposal for Image Comics' own power-scaling (like Marvel and DC) as well as determining what verses made by the publishing company are canon and non-canon to each other. I know there have been some talks about getting rid of the Image Comics page on the wiki entirely, but I don't think we should delete it just yet or treat it as a mere "publishing company"; some verses like Supreme had canon ties with Spawn before the events of Image Comics' Shattered Image, after all.I think both work to some degree, using "(Comics)" to indicate that these are the characters from the Invincible comics or using "(Image Comics)" to indicate that these are the characters from the comics which are published by Image Comics, although yeah I agree that using "(Comics)" is probably better, less confusing and more convenient, with "(Invincible Comics)" being used for characters that have an overlap in names with others from other franchises.
Although before making any changes I think we should consult and ask the verse supporters about the change since it would affect all the comic character pages.
And if we were to change it we should also do the same for other series published by Image for example many characters from Spawn seem to use "(Image Comics)" which would be changed to "(Spawn)" and etc...
Three... thousand and two hundred eight five spells?Actually, I lied, it's only three thousand two hunded eighty five spells.
I'd post a Filthy Frank meme here, but I am only a mere 100% sure that that would get my ass warned.
Simple answer!Three... thousand and two hundred eight five spells?
That's... 3.285?!
How did you had the patience to write all that?
Hm.Simple answer!
I haven't yet. I occasionally chip away at Malygos' profile. I don't torture myself by staying up 48 hours just doing that.
Update: Further regarding the super earth profile, the 5-B rating relies on the idea that Super Earth is telling the truth about the illuminate actually having world ending technology, something that really shouldn't be given any actual weight as Super Earth used the same lie in the events of Helldivers 1 to wage war against the illuminate in the first place when the illuminate were a completely peaceful society. (which obviously wouldn't make any sense for them to be making world ending technology in that context)
a very rough profile which has no calcs for it's High 8-C end, and dubious 8-C scaling.
The 8-C makes no sense as Helldiver Stratagems which can gore them come out to be far weaker than 8-C. many stratagems end up having 4-12 radius explosions which would come out to be around 9-A at absolute highest. You don't scale to 8-C physically when even some of your weaker stratagems which can gore you come out to be 9-A.
And even without the mentioning of stratagems, Chargers can instantly kill Helldivers, and the attacks from chargers that Helldivers can survive leave them nearly dead anyways. Just isn't a good idea to scale helldivers to that.
You can get rid of This profile for the same reasons, especially with that 5-B rating due to being vague. I am planning on reworking on the verse but these gotta go.