• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Jujutsu Kaisen: Sukuna splits a cloud calc

What about that yellow sign as reference? It’s between the debris.
any size for that thing? @Rodriiogo
There is a way that could work but I saw nothing of reference for its size to measure from when I looked over things earlier and I'd rather not assume some arbitrary size otherwise unless Rod finds some concrete way to measure it otherwise
Ok so first off, here's a gif of the place itself around the same exact angle that the anime. (Couldn't line it up perfectly since neither google earth nor google maps had any the right angle, the camera should just be a bit more ahead and it'd be perfect lol)
bQ2KV4u.gif


Apparently the yellow sign is something that doesn't exist, or if it did exist it was removed in every single google earth/maps shot of it, maybe a celebration thing.

However I think the landpost should still be used (but this time with more supporting stuff about it)

First off, the camera position, the camera position is actually not that much angled with the lampost, it's actually in a very perfect angle of where the camera is looking.
wvzCa4V.png

Green Line = Distance between the lampost and the tree (the distance might be important for later since it could be used, but the end nearest to the camera is the lampost)
Blue rectangle = Where the debris should be.

As seen here the camera is actually not at that weird of an angle and is looking directly at where the lampost is, it's actually looking directly at it and, as seen in the gif, the debris should indeed be at least where the camera is if not nearer the middle of the street. The angle is only completely broken when in relation to the Buzz Park and the Parco building which are unrelated here.

Now for why the distance between the lampost and the tree are important, the distance between the two is only around 11 meters, while the distance between the camera and the lampost is already around 9 meters. With the knowledge that the debris are in-between this, both the tree and the debris do indeed share the same perspective/layer.

More support for this is the second frame which I just asked myself now why we ignore it. Getting once again a gif of around the same angle:
51vRLyU.gif

The camera in the middle of the street (here's the camera looking down just to prove) and as you can see the debris are already to its right going are already around if not beyond the middle of the street.

I think AT LEAST the distance between the building and the lampost should be very much usable via this, which should mean the intial distance is at least around 6.5m

Which using the values that Dale got from his px scaling: High end time: 7.10705882/14.8517752 = 0.4785326147s

However considering the things I showed, the initial distance might be even bigger than just 6.5m since the angle is indeed correct for the lampost which would mean the debris should be around almost the middle of the street.
 
What I mean by the last part is, we can indeed probably get the distance via the camera itself, just not through the building directly because of what I showed of where the camera is in those scenes in relation to the rest.
 
Ok so first off, here's a gif of the place itself around the same exact angle that the anime. (Couldn't line it up perfectly since neither google earth nor google maps had any the right angle, the camera should just be a bit more ahead and it'd be perfect lol)
bQ2KV4u.gif


Apparently the yellow sign is something that doesn't exist, or if it did exist it was removed in every single google earth/maps shot of it, maybe a celebration thing.

However I think the landpost should still be used (but this time with more supporting stuff about it)

First off, the camera position, the camera position is actually not that much angled with the lampost, it's actually in a very perfect angle of where the camera is looking.
wvzCa4V.png

Green Line = Distance between the lampost and the tree (the distance might be important for later since it could be used, but the end nearest to the camera is the lampost)
Blue rectangle = Where the debris should be.

As seen here the camera is actually not at that weird of an angle and is looking directly at where the lampost is, it's actually looking directly at it and, as seen in the gif, the debris should indeed be at least where the camera is if not nearer the middle of the street. The angle is only completely broken when in relation to the Buzz Park and the Parco building which are unrelated here.

Now for why the distance between the lampost and the tree are important, the distance between the two is only around 11 meters, while the distance between the camera and the lampost is already around 9 meters. With the knowledge that the debris are in-between this, both the tree and the debris do indeed share the same perspective/layer.

More support for this is the second frame which I just asked myself now why we ignore it. Getting once again a gif of around the same angle:
51vRLyU.gif

The camera in the middle of the street (here's the camera looking down just to prove) and as you can see the debris are already to its right going are already around if not beyond the middle of the street.

I think AT LEAST the distance between the building and the lampost should be very much usable via this, which should mean the intial distance is at least around 6.5m

Which using the values that Dale got from his px scaling: High end time: 7.10705882/14.8517752 = 0.4785326147s

However considering the things I showed, the initial distance might be even bigger than just 6.5m since the angle is indeed correct for the lampost which would mean the debris should be around almost the middle of the street.
I don't even got a horse in this race but I gotta respect the effort of making new gifs to prove a point
 
Ok so first off, here's a gif of the place itself around the same exact angle that the anime. (Couldn't line it up perfectly since neither google earth nor google maps had any the right angle, the camera should just be a bit more ahead and it'd be perfect lol)
bQ2KV4u.gif


Apparently the yellow sign is something that doesn't exist, or if it did exist it was removed in every single google earth/maps shot of it, maybe a celebration thing.

However I think the landpost should still be used (but this time with more supporting stuff about it)

First off, the camera position, the camera position is actually not that much angled with the lampost, it's actually in a very perfect angle of where the camera is looking.
wvzCa4V.png

Green Line = Distance between the lampost and the tree (the distance might be important for later since it could be used, but the end nearest to the camera is the lampost)
Blue rectangle = Where the debris should be.

As seen here the camera is actually not at that weird of an angle and is looking directly at where the lampost is, it's actually looking directly at it and, as seen in the gif, the debris should indeed be at least where the camera is if not nearer the middle of the street. The angle is only completely broken when in relation to the Buzz Park and the Parco building which are unrelated here.

Now for why the distance between the lampost and the tree are important, the distance between the two is only around 11 meters, while the distance between the camera and the lampost is already around 9 meters. With the knowledge that the debris are in-between this, both the tree and the debris do indeed share the same perspective/layer.

More support for this is the second frame which I just asked myself now why we ignore it. Getting once again a gif of around the same angle:
51vRLyU.gif

The camera in the middle of the street (here's the camera looking down just to prove) and as you can see the debris are already to its right going are already around if not beyond the middle of the street.

I think AT LEAST the distance between the building and the lampost should be very much usable via this, which should mean the intial distance is at least around 6.5m

Which using the values that Dale got from his px scaling: High end time: 7.10705882/14.8517752 = 0.4785326147s

However considering the things I showed, the initial distance might be even bigger than just 6.5m since the angle is indeed correct for the lampost which would mean the debris should be around almost the middle of the street.
This should be fine
 
Alright, gonna put the calc with new method (of both the debris speed and the intial distance) in a blog and edit the post for it
 
I can update it myself tomorrow
I did it myself cause ppl told me there were some mistakes in measurements of both real life and px so i fixed allat in one go, hopefully (also u lowk kinda used a small ash major radius for the oval shape that made it almost a circle)

This should be fine
Can you just check it out in blog form if everything is fine?
I will update the post once confirmed
 
Last edited:
I did it myself cause ppl told me there were some mistakes in measurements of both real life and px so i fixed allat in one go, hopefully (also u lowk kinda used a small ash major radius for the oval shape that made it almost a circle)


Can you just check it out in blog form if everything is fine?
I will update the post once confirmed
Well fine by me if i dont gotta do it
 
Back
Top