• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

If you need to change or delete a render next time, just go through the proper route.
Fine. I'll discuss this further in the image requests thread. Sweet Mask is one of my favorite characters and I don't want his profile to be cluttered with garbage renders.
 
This seems to be minor and even reasonable, but it's still a stat change. What do people think?
I think that the revision is minor and sensible, but it should still require a minor content revision thread to follow our standard procedures.

I gave instructions to the member in question. 🙏

 
I appreciate the effort, but content moderators shouldn’t be issuing bans (Only allowed when necessary), that responsibility should be left to admins. Since this was the user’s first instance of vandalism, a warning or clear instructions would have been more appropriate. If the behavior continued after that, then a vandalism ban would be justified.
Given that it may just have been an editing mistake, a warning would probably be better in this case, yes. 🙏
 
I appreciate the effort, but content moderators shouldn’t be issuing bans (Only allowed when necessary), that responsibility should be left to admins. Since this was the user’s first instance of vandalism, a warning or clear instructions would have been more appropriate. If the behavior continued after that, then a vandalism ban would be justified.
It was only because they were randomly removing keys for no apparent reason which included Tier 1 keys. It just looked like malicious vandalism.

It's fine though. I trust both yours and Ant's judgement on matters like this.
 
Well, one of them was blocked, but I blocked the other account as well. 🙏
 
Thank you for helping out to you as well. 🙏❤️
 
I warned the user and locked the page, since it's a Tier 1 page.
The page is meant to be unlocked, a user requested for it to be unlocked due to a verse wide revision. There are a ton of profiles for the verse, so it’ll take time for the user to get around to editing all of them. It should remain unlocked, at least for now.
 
The page is meant to be unlocked, a user requested for it to be unlocked due to a verse wide revision. There are a ton of profiles for the verse, so it’ll take time for the user to get around to editing all of them. It should remain unlocked, at least for now.
I suppose I can unlock it. I noticed that you had, it just stood out that no CRT-based edits had been made since unlocking.
 
Back
Top