• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Combat intelligence statistics and optional continuity sections in verse pages

It depends on if you use the automatic mobile view layout or the desktop layout while viewing a page with your phone. 🙏
 
Yes. That seems good to me. Thank you. 🙏
 
I'd personally say segment that whole skill section away a bit more since imo "astoundingly skilled in combat" still reads like something synonymous to the intelligence ratings we just got rid of so I'd say remove that wording and follow either the bulleted example that explains the skill section and shows its separate or go with the tabber example.


You should also actually explain why is above average in general instead of leaving that blank




Either of these styles works best but I'd say the first one shows a better example for you specifically since it also has above average intelligence and a justification I'm sure you could use as an example for your own above average rating
 
Do these changes affect different "aspects" of combat intelligence being transferrable?

For example, a character who is skilled enough to copy a fighting technique instantly is also assumed to be very skilled in dodging attacks from oponents.
 
Do these changes affect different "aspects" of combat intelligence being transferrable?

For example, a character who is skilled enough to copy a fighting technique instantly is also assumed to be very skilled in dodging attacks from oponents.
Can you reword this please so I can understand and answer 🙏
 
Can you reword this please so I can understand and answer 🙏

When it comes to skill discussions in versus threads, people often say that Character A will be unable to hit Character B because Character B is much more skilled in combat than Character A. This is usually said even when Character B's skill feats are unrelated to dodging attacks, and are something like being able to copy a technique just by seeing it.

I'm wondering if we should still assume that a character who shows an impressive feat in one area of combat is also as impressive in other areas of combat.

Sorry if I'm not being clear 😅
 
When it comes to skill discussions in versus threads, people often say that Character A will be unable to hit Character B because Character B is much more skilled in combat than Character A. This is usually said even when Character B's skill feats are unrelated to dodging attacks, and are something like being able to copy a technique just by seeing it.

I'm wondering if we should still assume that a character who shows an impressive feat in one area of combat is also as impressive in other areas of combat.

Sorry if I'm not being clear 😅
Just make it clear what areas they are skilled in? This is pretty case by case and vague, if they didn't have the necessary skill justifications then I'd argue againstnit if they did then I wouldn't 🤷‍♂️
 
I know who ts might be about. Painful but true.
spongebob-goofyahhspongebob.gif
 
Oh boy, I can't wait to type out literally everything for Lupin III's continuity section except for like a handful of manga and a kabuki play


That section is optional though. 🙏
 
Oh. I thought that you were sarcastic. No problem then. 🙏
 
Back
Top