- 15,741
- 5,341
That's just semantics. Even if we believe he is just "adding a cause," he would be disrupting all the causes that were in place around it and as a side effect of it. At which point, he is fitting that super literal interpretation of the wording in the Causality Manipulation page.
But that interpretation is not even correct in the first place, to manipute causality is Causality Manipulation. Limiting it to this and that specific manipulations of causality is just an error in the wording. I would bet my headphones on that.
But that interpretation is not even correct in the first place, to manipute causality is Causality Manipulation. Limiting it to this and that specific manipulations of causality is just an error in the wording. I would bet my headphones on that.