- 189
- 99
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
What metaphysical aspect would that be here?
- Thread starter IvarUHQ
- Start date
- 267
- 300
Too vague. Seems like a metaphor.
- 189
- 99
- Thread starter
- #5
I will send all the context when I get back home
- 362
- 220
well since mc of twatf and kim Dokja are on same level he might have cm1 and info 2 also, not sure about plot hax.
ScrollerGNL
He/Him- 83
- 99
Clothes just refer to outward manifestation, that is, the essential and accidental properties of an individual. The webtoon elaborates upon this far better, even going to posit substrate theory, that is, there is an underlying substance "upon" which these properties are founded upon. The relation here implies that there exists a universal which is exemplified/instantiated by these substances in order to bear these properties (-> otherwise there would be nothing to explain the "relations" between individuals. For example why multiple people share the "property" of being good at stabbing. And there is also stated to be a "Concept of Clothes"), so overall, H1-A+ as per the CM page. You could refer to the PSW cosmology page as well.
ScrollerGNL
He/Him- 83
- 99
Here. (Ignore the captions, I hadn't picked up a book before writing those)
- 5,795
- 7,374
Pretty sure VSBW wouldn’t be willing to grant anything for this; High 1-A+ I believe is strictly modal realism and nothing else. Also, you shouldn’t trust the CM page; the mods here don’t actually appeal to the descriptions you see there when approving smthn. (CM1 is not actually treated like a Universal for some reason even though the descriptions says it must)
- 362
- 220
where ?, most of the cm1 or cm2 is only given when cm is on universal scale.
- 5,795
- 7,374
Having a universal scale is not the definition of a universal
ScrollerGNL
He/Him- 83
- 99
Really? I remember Ultima saying that self predication is sufficent for H1-A+. I could care less about the way the wiki treats misappropriates definitions anyway.
Arkenis
They/Them- 25,417
- 13,135
Is there something I'm missing? Where did h1a come from cuz substrate theory does not sound like that.
No that isn't universal scale, it's universal in it's quality. As in all under its domain are influenced by it.
- 5,795
- 7,374
Well if Ultima said it then sure, but I’m very sus about it cuz noone in this wiki scales to High 1-A+ without Modal Realism
This is about self-predication (necessary existence), which necessitates High 1-A+ scope
ScrollerGNL
He/Him- 83
- 99
It's not about substrate theory, it's about universal realism that is entailed from it and mentioned inverse, which, in this instance, is a necessary existence.
- 5,795
- 7,374
Bro is bumping a question thread 
- 189
- 99
- Thread starter
- #21
This is not a thread. I am currently confused. I am trying to figure out what metaphysical aspect this belongs to, and I am asking for answers because I don't have them
- 5,795
- 7,374
You can say it’s some hyper-extreme form of CM1 ig
Arkenis
They/Them- 25,417
- 13,135
This is a thread. People have offered up several opinions. I'm saying you should ask them to get a good answer.
- 189
- 99
- Thread starter
- #24
The problem is that I am told that there is no context and when I send the context there is no more response
- 362
- 220
seems like cm1 to me
Arkenis
They/Them- 25,417
- 13,135
several people responded lmao. Decide what you think.
ScrollerGNL
He/Him- 83
- 99
- 189
- 99
- Thread starter
- #28
In the beginning, there was neither "me" nor "other": beings and the world formed an absolute unity. The appearance of "clothes" introduced the distinction - the "I", the ego, the self-awareness. Wearing a garment is equivalent to differentiating yourself from the world, protecting yourself from it while separating from it. Thus, clothing is the essence of individuality and duality “self / non-self”.Literally just explained
This division has generated diversity, emotions (love, trust, hate), and the birth of the gods: humans who understood the true nature of clothes and used this power to shape their own worlds. “Colothes” therefore do not designate physical clothes, but the existential principle by which a being becomes conscious, acquires an identity, and creates a distinct reality.
In summary:
Clothes = the "I", the individual consciousness, the border between unity and multiplicity -
- 189
- 99
- Thread starter
- #30
And for the system?Literally just explained
ScrollerGNL
He/Him- 83
- 99
Nowhere (unless you wish to scale it using the beings who derive their power from it), it has been a while since I've read the work anyway so I could be wrong.
- 189
- 99
- Thread starter
- #32
You can come to Discord to discuss the work. I've finished the web novel, but I have some questions if you have time. My Discord: ivarsauter
Similar threads
