• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Possibly High 3-A Range for MCU Sentry/The Void (Edited)

Naeem0304

He/Him
Messages
619
Reaction score
622
On the JP Marvel/Disney Website (an official source), its stated numerous times that Sentry is the "strongest enemy in history":
  • Anyway, I want to turn attention to the text above. "The Existence of the Sentry, the strongest enemy that the Thunderbolts will face."
  1. The text is clearly written in past-tense, as we have no indication that Sentry will be more powerful than Doctor Doom or any other threats in Doomsday/Secret Wars. Lastly, it'd be a massive breach of marketing and contract if it was a future-tense statement.
  2. This implies that Sentry is stronger than Gauntlet Thanos (currently rated at 3-A, although he'd logically be H3A thanks to the cosmology upgrade), given how Bucky participated in the fight against Gauntlet Thanos in Wakanda (Infinity War).
  • "Strongest enemy in history" would only pertain to Avengers Villains, as the texts following the statements reference the Avengers. Therefore, Dormammu wouldn't apply here.
In the All about Bob, Sentry & The Void DVD feature of Thunderbolts, this is what's said by Eric Pearson (the Screenwriter for the film).
Director Jake Schreier compared Sentry's power, or influence, to the Infinity Stones (which was linked to Sentry's statement page).
Jake Schreier when asked how 'THUNDERBOLTS*' connects to Avengers Doomsday. --- "There might be some stones, or pebbles. I don't know how you want to rate your rocks. Look, you know the character that we're talking about, and you know there's a level of power involved there that could have an impact going forward.
Because we have a statement of H3A power, and Sentry/Void being the "strongest enemy in history", this would likely mean that Sentry's power could be on the level of the Infinity Stones (barring Low 1-C scaling from Infinity Ultron).

I'm proposing a "Possibly" High 3-A AP rating for two reasons:

  1. Avengers Doomsday has yet to release, so Jake Schreier's statement can easily be different from this interpretation.
  2. The true H3A supporting statement from "erasing the universe" is quite vague, since we only saw The Void turning people into shadows. The buildings in New York City weren't affected beyond getting blackened by the shadows.
A) Assuming the AP proposal is rejected, I think High 3-A via Darkness Manipulation should at least be a given.
 
Last edited:
I agree, pretty straight forward. It's actually comical how many statements he has about being the strongest enemy in history
I know right😂

I kept going from article to article, and in some shape or form it kept coming up.
 
I know right😂

I kept going from article to article, and in some shape or form it kept coming up.
There's probably some more out there but it'd be beating up a dead horse at that point. The general idea is all the same "Errr yeah Sentry is kinda cracked guys"
"Possibly H3A" sounds really good
 
Sentry having infinite power requires enormous levels of evidence that is not supported here. Unless he actually overpowes an Infinity Gauntlet, alters an infinite realm or a better statement is given about his shadow realm I'm not in support of this upgrade.

Our FAQ about similar statements have a note that must be considered:
Q: What is the Tier for possessing Infinite Power or Infinite Strength?
A: Statements regarding infinite power, infinite strength, or unlimited quantities do not automatically indicate an ability to produce an infinite amount of energy at once. For example, a power source that never depletes could have an infinite quantity of energy, but can't necessarily be wielded with infinite magnitude (not all at once). Statements involving "infinite power/strength" must be clearly indicative of magnitude to qualify for tiering, in order to avoid inflated ratings or inconsistencies in a story. Further, the hyperbolic nature of the phrase must be taken into consideration, where characters are prone to describing someone's power as infinite in a context where it is so great as to be insurmountable from their perspective, but not truly infinite in a manner relevant to their tier. If proven, however, statements of infinite strength would qualify for High 3-A or higher if evidence regarding a higher degree of infinity above baseline is established.

So I disagree. If Sentry is upgraded he will require something far more direct in my mind.
 
Sentry having infinite power requires enormous levels of evidence that is not supported here. Unless he actually overpowes an Infinity Gauntlet, alters an infinite realm or a better statement is given about his shadow realm I'm not in support of this upgrade.

Our FAQ about similar statements have a note that must be considered:


So I disagree. If Sentry is upgraded he will require something far more direct in my mind.
Further, the hyperbolic nature of the phrase must be taken into consideration, where characters are prone to describing someone's power as infinite in a context where it is so great as to be insurmountable from their perspective, but not truly infinite in a manner relevant to their tier.
That's a fair statement.

Anyway, what about High 3-A or Universal range via Shadow Manipulation? AP wasn't the only proposal.
 
Anyway, what about High 3-A or Universal range via Shadow Manipulation? AP wasn't the only proposal.
In the movie itself they only mentions the Shadows as covering the Earth. Going from Earth to infinite range would also require more to it in my view.
 
In the movie itself they only mentions the Shadows as covering the Earth. Going from Earth to infinite range would also require more to it in my view.
Because earth is all that matters in that situation? like how blast only mentions earth during Sp2 clash yet it destroys a lot more then earth

It’s also important to know thunderbolts flat out plot nerfed the feats in the film literally admitted by director they wanted everything to be grounded and that was their choice they could’ve went bigger but they wanted smaller
 
In the movie itself they only mentions the Shadows as covering the Earth. Going from Earth to infinite range would also require more to it in my view.
The only person who said that in-movie was the doctor at the beginning, when he was warning Yelena about the risks of The Void. Plus, he never got to see Void's full potential; he only saw a small glimpse of it (when Yelena was looking at pictures from the lab, it showed two people who were shadowed).

In fact, this is all he said:

Yelena: It’s gonna change the world.

The Doctor: No, no, no. It could end the world.
The statement doesn't definitively say the Shadows would only cover the Earth. "End the world" can mean anything.

---


The "universe" statement comes from a DVD extra detailing Sentry and the Void, and from the Screenwriter.
 
Because earth is all that matters in that situation? like how blast only mentions earth during Sp2 clash yet it destroys a lot more then earth

It’s also important to know thunderbolts flat out plot nerfed the feats in the film literally admitted by director they wanted everything to be grounded and that was their choice they could’ve went bigger but they wanted smaller
This is true. I just finished watching the Director's Commentary, and during the Sentry fight, Director Jake Schreier says they were holding off on how much Sentry was going to do, even though he said Sentry had a "limitless power-set" (here's a linked clip from Twitter that I put in streamable).
 
It’s also important to know thunderbolts flat out plot nerfed the feats in the film literally admitted by director they wanted everything to be grounded and that was their choice they could’ve went bigger but they wanted smaller
That works against the point. To back a universal rating you need universal feats.
The "universe" statement comes from a DVD extra detailing Sentry and the Void, and from the Screenwriter.
Since we already accept it in his current profile, I guess a possibly rating for range alone would be fine. Though the link would need to be fixed.
 
Since we already accept it in his current profile, I guess a possibly rating for range alone would be fine. Though the link would need to be fixed.
The original link was destroyed because IMGUR decided to go AWOL on a bunch of people's images.

I can just link a new one at some other point today.
 
That works against the point. To back a universal rating you need universal feats.

Since we already accept it in his current profile, I guess a possibly rating for range alone would be fine. Though the link would need to be fixed.
Quick question. For a CRT like this, would your vote be enough for it to be applied, or 1-2 more votes from other staff are required?
 
Quick question. For a CRT like this, would your vote be enough for it to be applied, or 1-2 more votes from other staff are required?
Usually you need two mods. But if its only range and not AP it can probably be applied
 
Usually you need two mods. But if its only range and not AP it can probably be applied
Yup, the upgrade now was only for range, and not AP (since there's not enough evidence, and waiting to see what Sentry does in Doomsday/Secret Wars is the better option).

Upgrade was applied. This can be closed.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top