- 2,107
- 1,241
Nuh uhIn no reality do they scale to sukuna
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nuh uhIn no reality do they scale to sukuna
If take that literally, Maki has the highest durablity known to man due to survive two "full power" blackflashes from Sukuna who's stated to brought to elation and that makes no sense.Sukuna explicitly completely restored all, or at least most of his CE and physical damage when he went into his true form
Yes he was explicitly holding backIf take that literally, Maki has the highest durablity known to man due to survive two "full power" blackflashes from Sukuna who's stated to brought to elation and that makes no sense.
He's also stated and shown to be holding back as shown when he blitz Maki and Yuta saying he'd been oneshot by a dismantle if gojo didn't WEAKEN sukuna
He could not be holding back but he also just can't be using his optimal output due to his injuries and soul punches reducing his output.But there's no reason he would hold back against Awakened Yuji considering he was taking a shit ton of damage
AightBut guys, this has zero to do with the crt, just go discuss in the discussion thread.
amount of cursed energy =/= cursed energy outputAnd still had as much if not more Cursed Energy as Yuta after the fight
Eh. CE as a whole is not really the best measuring stick for inverse scaling imoAnd still had as much if not more Cursed Energy as Yuta after the fight
Chain scaling in jjk is weird cause it basically: "Heavy Hitters" < Real Heavy Hitters < Heavier Hitters < Sukuna and Gojojust do the good ol chainscale
this is true.Chain scaling in jjk is weird cause it basically: "Heavy Hitters" < Real Heavy Hitters < Heavier Hitters < Sukuna and Gojo
Cause not all the heavy hitters scale to each other, like, at all
700 kilotons Vs 160 kilotons of TNT ahh.this is true.
thats where agenda comes into play.
JoGoat needs 1 meteor to cook these frauds (except Gojo and Sukie)
Its unknown if it decreases the lifespan i thinkUh, I don't really wanna read through the thread, but instead of using the robot's GPE or KE of walking, why don't we use the energy of the punches that cratered the side of the mountain he launched Mahito at? That didn't decrease the lifespan of the robot at all. Wouldn't that be fine to use or was this discussed already?
We don't see a decrease in lifespan from the attack immediately after IIRC. Why would we assume it decreases the lifespan up by a significant amount of there's no statement of it using up a lot like the energy beam attacks? At that point I think you could argue the same for its KE for walking, no?Its unknown if it decreases the lifespan i think
See what?do we even see that for the movement?
Well actually the activity limit (or runtime) is by definition how long something can run for under normal circumstances. This would ofc include something such as walking and due to the mecha being used for fighting you could probably include normal attacks too. Ofc im not changing it atp tho,We don't see a decrease in lifespan from the attack immediately after IIRC. Why would we assume it decreases the lifespan up by a significant amount of there's no statement of it using up a lot like the energy beam attacks? At that point I think you could argue the same for its KE for walking, no?
No, there is no decrease in lifespan we see for the movements. Including the punches he did that cratered the mountain. When we see the operation time left, it is still exactly the same that it had been since he had used the 2 year charge attack.the decrease in lifespan for just the movements. I swear I brought this up before lol
If attacking is part of the normal operations, and the craters he did on the mountain would garner vastly different results, why not bother calculating that too?Well actually the activity limit (or runtime) is by definition how long something can run for under normal circumstances. This would ofc include something such as walking and due to the mecha being used for fighting you could probably include normal attacks too. Ofc im not changing it atp tho,
Im not changing the thread atp. If anything that can be for a different one.If attacking is part of the normal operations, and the craters he did on the mountain would garner vastly different results, why not bother calculating that too?
Yeah, but said thread would completely change the results of this thread anyways. So I don't see a reason why you wouldn't want to just cover it here. It's not like you can't leave the old proposition there, and offer a new second proposition accounting for this new information.Im not changing the thread atp. If anything that can be for a different one.
Is this an Agree, I really cant tellI believe I see what you're saying, though I'm not sure if there's a better solution without a better feat.
At some point we have to equate the fictional energy with real energy for our tiering system to function.
wouldnt be changing much, we'd just be going by an actual feat of the mech.Im not changing the thread atp. If anything that can be for a different one.
Wasn't there one staff vote? or did they just show up and not vote, cause it still says no staff votes on the OPBump
CoughYeah, but said thread would completely change the results of this thread anyways. So I don't see a reason why you wouldn't want to just cover it here. It's not like you can't leave the old proposition there, and offer a new second proposition accounting for this new information.
No, bumpWasn't there one staff vote? or did they just show up and not vote, cause it still says no staff votes on the OP
FinePoint said the calculations are fine, page 4No, bump
Cough again. This is smth super important that seems weird to gloss overYeah, but said thread would completely change the results of this thread anyways. So I don't see a reason why you wouldn't want to just cover it here. It's not like you can't leave the old proposition there, and offer a new second proposition accounting for this new information.
Smth that would completely remove all the effects of this CRT. C'mon EljYeah, but said thread would completely change the results of this thread anyways. So I don't see a reason why you wouldn't want to just cover it here. It's not like you can't leave the old proposition there, and offer a new second proposition accounting for this new information.