Okay, you know what? I need actual evidence this rule exists, because so far I haven't found much.
A mod legit just told you, and like 5 people now have said as much.
You're being stubborn, refusing to do what's asked of you, and what's being asked isn't even extreme, it's the most basic thing possible and you're only being asked for 1 solid piece of evidence, on top of being given alternative methods on how to go about proving it.
Like did you even do what I suggested? Did you check the archive for the jap guides?
Where on the wiki does it state that you need to provide explicit statements or visuals that a character is using "equal or greater" energy than an artifact in order to be placed on that tier with it?
Go read the Metroid downgrades, the Kirby downgrades, every Sonic upgrade because chaos emerald slop is brought up every time, the tier 2 Zelda thread, etc.
Are you legitimately asking why you need proof? You need proof for anything, why not just say Mario is like 1-A at that point, silly is it not?
If this rule isn't on the wiki, why do you guys only have it on the forums?
I'm pretty sure "you need proof of scaling" is a established rule on wiki?
Show me some CRTs your community made for the verses they added to the wiki that went over this very rule.
I just pointed you toward some. The Metroid one isn't even that old, it's exactly why we downgraded Emperor Ing, because despite using the Light of Aether asa power source, we know the LoA is a
limited source of power, and in fact is a tier 5 source of power.
And obviously Ing doesn't use it all up in combat, why? Because if he used it all the planet would legit collapse, if he used it all he wouldn't be able to draw on it again and again to attack, and if he used it all, Samus wouldn't be able to kill him, take the remainder of it, and give it back to the brugs because it would be GONE.
That's the exact same premise as Koops with the GS, we had no idea how much power he was using at a given time but we knew it couldn't be all of it, so he was downgraded.
More importantly, seeing as how YOU helped with the math and pixel-scaling for the calculation and suggested that we use the black hole in the beginning of this thread, why haven't YOU provided explicit proof that Bowser was using greater or equal energy to the Grand Star or that the Grand Star was the cause of the black hole?
Talk about biting the hand that feeds you holy hell, thank god I'm not a CGM anymore.
Because that isn't my job nor is it my CRT? It's you who wants it, I personally don't care.
I only gave you an out, out of generosity, I have verses I'm more concerned with that I'm busy overhauling, it isn't on me to do your job for you.
Me going "hey there's this feat that's done by a GS, here's a way to do it"
and then you ignore the two low ends and only publish the high end for some reason but that's neither here nor there, doesn't make it my responsibility to waste my time gathering the evidence for you, you knew that from the get-go, I even told you to make sure you spent the time going through stuff to make a proper CRT with proper scans.
You did not, and you're continuing to refuse to and I have no idea why? If you don't want to make proper CRTs or index properly, don't make threads about it, like idk what you want me to say here, this goes for everyone.
So instead of trying to, in the most ridiculous 180 ever,
go against someone who was helping you, because you don't want to spend what is probably only a few hours of skimming text dumps or jap guides, actually do so, and on that note, please never ask me for help again, if someone like Emile or idk who they are wants to ask sure, but you're clearly not appreciative of my time.