• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

HSR scale stuff. (IM NEED STAFF VOTE :pray:)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, remove 3-C. Not only that part was retconned where Lord Ravagers incinerating entire galaxies were turned into star systems in the translation itself (Main justification for 3-C in Enryu's CRT), like any galaxy in HSR might as well be the Asdana galaxy which is atleast millions of lightyears in size which again the Tia'nua galaxy that Zephyro was destroying should be similar cause there are like 2 planets that's like Glamoth (5-A) and then 2 small ones in which I assumed the size would be similar to Earth or something anyway. And he dimmed those "stars" casually, they were stated as stars

Galaxy that spans millions of lightyears always warrants 3-B, like the base value of 3-B were if you destroyed Milky Way and Andromeda Galaxy completely which is just 100-200k lightyears away from each other anyway

  • 3-B: Energy equal to or above what is needed to overcome the GBE of the Sun with an omnidirectional blast with the point of original of the blast beginning half way between the outer edge of the Milky Way and Andromeda Galaxies and the Sun being located at the outer edge of either Galaxy.
 
Yeah, remove 3-C. Not only that part was retconned where Lord Ravagers incinerating entire galaxies were turned into star systems in the translation itself (Main justification for 3-C in Enryu's CRT), like any galaxy in HSR might as well be the Asdana galaxy which is atleast millions of lightyears in size which again the Tia'nua galaxy that Zephyro was destroying should be similar cause there are like 2 planets that's like Glamoth (5-A) and then 2 small ones in which I assumed the size would be similar to Earth or something anyway. And he dimmed those "stars" casually, they were stated as stars

Galaxy that spans millions of lightyears always warrants 3-B, like the base value of 3-B were if you destroyed Milky Way and Andromeda Galaxy completely which is just 100-200k lightyears away from each other anyway
So basically we fix the arc splits

Herta space ship to xhianzhou will be 4-c

Penacony-Amphoreus will be 3-B
 
Yeah, remove 3-C. Not only that part was retconned where Lord Ravagers incinerating entire galaxies were turned into star systems in the translation itself (Main justification for 3-C in Enryu's CRT), like any galaxy in HSR might as well be the Asdana galaxy which is atleast millions of lightyears in size which again the Tia'nua galaxy that Zephyro was destroying should be similar cause there are like 2 planets that's like Glamoth (5-A) and then 2 small ones in which I assumed the size would be similar to Earth or something anyway. And he dimmed those "stars" casually, they were stated as stars

Galaxy that spans millions of lightyears always warrants 3-B, like the base value of 3-B were if you destroyed Milky Way and Andromeda Galaxy completely which is just 100-200k lightyears away from each other anyway
3-C for xianzhou comes from express scaling from penacony and then backwards... this vs R>F evolution
 
3-C for xianzhou comes from express scaling from penacony and then backwards... this vs R>F evolution
Oh, the 2.4 one? Yeah, that's 3-B instead of 3-C if all this gets accepted honestly. I was saying that Xianzhou is 4-A because you actually can take Argenti's companion mission after you completed the last Belobog mission (Silent Galaxy) which means, well you can take it before Xianzhou Luofu. Given I can't find his companion mission anywhere like in what time that mission takes place but again, it's gonna be Pre-Xianzhou Luofu anyway
 
Last edited:
Oh, the 2.4 one? Yeah, that's 3-B instead of 3-C if all this gets accepted honestly. I was saying that Xianzhou is 4-A because you actually can take Argenti's companion mission after you completee the last Belobog mission (Silent Galaxy) which means, well you can take it before Xianzhou Luofu. Given I can't find his companion mission anywhere like in what time that mission takes place but again, it's gonna be Pre-Xianzhou Luofu anyway
I mean 4-A xianzhou mfs outside generals Jingoiu Yqning and Hoolay is generally fine really. Yanqing can get tier 3 in wardancs arc and the rest are 4-C to 4-A. featless mfs are unknown and we good
 
They’re scaling to aventurine of stratagems.
In the profile it says that fought against an weakened Aventurine, but if I'm not wrong Aventurine also had his cornerstone shattered and only Acheron stopped him. Is the scaling due to this or by something else?
 
In the profile it says that fought against an weakened Aventurine, but if I'm not wrong Aventurine also had his cornerstone shattered and only Acheron stopped him. Is the scaling due to this or by something else?
That Cornerstone had like 1/10 the powers of an Emanator, that's why the cast scale to that level (Those that aren't Emanators or comparable)
 
That Cornerstone had like 1/10 the powers of an Emanator, that's why the cast scale to that level (Those that aren't Emanators or comparable)
Why would they scale at all? The cornerstone of Aventurine was shattered and it's power was diminished having less the power of detonating an stellaron so it could've less than 1/10 unless I missed something, also he fought casually against them before going serious and I don't see why would they scale if they can't hurt him at all in first place Welt was even going to use the Star of Eden to fight him and Himeko her powered laser before Acheron step on, and Aventurine did all of this just for Acheron to draw her blade since he wanted to die.
 
That's why this CRT exist
Yes, I just thought the downscaling from the cast to Phainon feat was by something else bcs Aventurine was clearly above them and had an shattered cornerstone I don't think he is 3-B at all, I still think 4-A fits more in this case since the cast can't hurt Aventurine with an shattered cornerstone
 
Last edited:
Phainon havin all 1-B stat "at his peak" should be fine given hoyo confirmed the animated short is real and Phainon facing Nanook is valid
 
Phainon havin all 1-B stat "at his peak" should be fine given hoyo confirmed the animated short is real and Phainon facing Nanook is valid
It should've variable tier though? Remember that Phainon increased his size until he reached Nanook, the power of Emanators highly varies

Smh like: "Varies from at least 3-B to 1-B at his peak" or "Varies, usually at least 3-B, up to 1-B at his peak"
 
Last edited:
It should've variable tier though? Remember that Phainon increased his size until he reached Nanook, the power of Emanators highly varies

Smh like: "Varies from at least 3-B to 1-B at his peak" or "Varies, usually at least 3-B, up to 1-B at his peak"
i mean yeah whatever its acceptwd already just get one more staff vote
 
i mean yeah whatever its acceptwd already just get one more staff vote
2 staff approvals are already enough, this is literally only a chainscaling from the things that are already accepted (Aeons being 1-B) and it only affects Phainon anyway not Emanators themselves. I don't see why it would warrant 3 staff approvals
 
2 staff approvals are already enough, this is literally only a chainscaling from the things that are already accepted (Aeons being 1-B) and it only affects Phainon anyway not Emanators themselves. I don't see why it would warrant 3 staff approvals
then apply the crt vro
 
2 staff approvals are already enough, this is literally only a chainscaling from the things that are already accepted (Aeons being 1-B) and it only affects Phainon anyway not Emanators themselves. I don't see why it would warrant 3 staff approvals
anything tier 1 related requires admin input so 1-b phainon and emanators needs an admin vote
 
Do we not need staff votes for the calc?
No, if it was already evaluated by CGM then it's enough. Plus, 2 staff approvals for 3-B already so there's not a problem here. They clearly agreed with 3-B then get it to be calculated for like the precise value of it, that's it
 
No, if it was already evaluated by CGM then it's enough. Plus, 2 staff approvals for 3-B already so there's not a problem here. They clearly agreed with 3-B then get it to be calculated for like the precise value of it, that's what it is
so basically we still need a single admin to approve of tier 1
 
45 quettafoe for emanators
4,5 quettafoe for cornerstone level
1-B for phainon at peak and i can be generous and give him outright 1-B for Irontomb merged key if somene can make that key on his profile
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top