- 177,446
- 90,370
- Thread starter
- #2,161
Thank you for being reasonable, but you need to shape up your behaviour.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Wiki Vandalism Reports
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
-
- Tags
- editing rules site rules
- 570
- 109
I know bro, but not just me, but everyone else too. Please, that's all I ask: improve your behavior.Thank you for being reasonable, but you need to shape up your behaviour.
Ebihara
Any/All- 2,109
- 1,654
I little introspection here is needed from you. I stand by what i said. When people dont agree with you, you are very rude and ignore what they say or dismiss valid points by saying things people shouldn't use there mouth just cause they have them. You can see by mine and other users comments and actions we have tried to help you. Called staff to stalled CRTS, provided instructions and advice and its just met with stonewalling and general rudeness and for the like 8th time you go behind everyones back and made an edit only to revert it once being called out. People are acting how you treat them. You have burned all good will with me personally and I know i am not alone feeling that. Just stop editing pages without a passes CRT. We shouldn't have to keep having this conversation. There are so many things on this website i disagree with and think the reasonings are bad, but we have rules for a reason as cliche as it sounds.
Last edited:
- 570
- 109
I understand bro, it's better that you know, I suffer from anger issues, of course I'm dealing with this but sometimes I get out of control, I don't justify myself of course I don't just want you to understand me
Ebihara
Any/All- 2,109
- 1,654
All good. Best way to show improvement is action. Try to work with others. We all have things we need to work through. Take accountability by not repeating the same mistake again. Everyone CAN be a productive user. This is the last thing I am saying as not to keep spamming this thread.
- 570
- 109
I better clear things up once and for all. The relationship with AceOfSpaces is very complicated. He criticizes me for making changes when he does it even without making threads, and I consider that, as I say without sounding rude, a bit "hypocritical." Here is the proof.
- 177,446
- 90,370
- Thread starter
- #2,169
ARCH, it seems best if you stop posting in this thread for now, as you have already said what you needed to. Our staff will likely need to give you an official warning though.
- 177,446
- 90,370
- Thread starter
- #2,171
@AKM sama @DontTalkDT @Mr. Bambu @DarkDragonMedeus @Just_a_Random_Butler @Agnaa @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @GrathOfLux @Dereck03 @Planck69 @LephyrTheRevanchist
We need your continuous help here.
We need your continuous help here.
AlipheeseXIV
He/Him- 3,320
- 1,822
- 9,127
- 9,981
To my understanding, Non-Duality and Restoration were already settled in the thread.
AlipheeseXIV
He/Him- 3,320
- 1,822
They were not. The thread doesn't even have the required amount of staff votes. Not to mention restoration is not even apart of the thread, you're not allowed to make a downgrade or upgrade CRT and add things haphazardly that are literally unrelated to the thread.
- 9,127
- 9,981
What do you believe is the required amount of staff votes supposed to be?
AlipheeseXIV
He/Him- 3,320
- 1,822
You need 3 votes, I've been told this by staff multiple times.
Also this.
- 9,127
- 9,981
That is only if "the series verse has a significant following or a large amount of material has been published based on its content"
"a minimum of two staff members to sign off on any proposed changes."
AlipheeseXIV
He/Him- 3,320
- 1,822
If it affects a tier 1 character or multiple I have been told by multiple staff that it requires 3 votes.
- 1,246
- 1,159
Technically, it only pertains to if a T1 character's rating is being revised (I think), though I could see the argument that this should just be any revision that affects a T1 character
- 9,127
- 9,981
This is only for "Tier 1 and/or Tier 0 ratings"
"For content revisions that affect Tier 2 or higher, the participation of at least one Administrator in the review and approval process is required."
AlipheeseXIV
He/Him- 3,320
- 1,822
The characters affected in question are tier 1.
- 14,997
- 10,400
the tier 1 rating itself is not being affected
- 9,127
- 9,981
This only applies to stats "ratings."
- 1,246
- 1,159
So the abilities and powers of a T1 page is not inherently considered either highly controversial (Unless the abilities themselves are) or a big enough revision for 3 staff? (This is not an attempt to throw shade, it's a genuine question)
AlipheeseXIV
He/Him- 3,320
- 1,822
This. I had been told it was the case for tier 1 in general and not just stats but alright.
- 9,127
- 9,981
- 1,246
- 1,159
I see. So as long as the abilities themselves are not controversial in nature, the tier of the page in question does not matter? I'll be honest, I always thought anything involving a T1 page would require 3 staff, no matter what. But it is true that it's not stated that all changes to a T1 page requires 3 staff. Thank you for your answer.
AlipheeseXIV
He/Him- 3,320
- 1,822
Allegedly doesn't matter whether the abilities themselves are controversial in nature or not.
- 34,674
- 42,017
The edit was mainly a removal of a couple abilities that didn't seem like too controversial of a change. So I think 2 staff members is enough, but I will comment.
- 177,446
- 90,370
- Thread starter
- #2,190
I think that we have only clearly defined our requirements for the actual tiers of tier 1 characters, as requiring a higher number of staff evaluators, but am not certain. Perhaps that is an overlooked hole in our rules that needs to be filled/better defined?
@Agnaa @AKM sama @DontTalkDT @Mr. Bambu @Damage3245
What do you think?
@Agnaa @AKM sama @DontTalkDT @Mr. Bambu @Damage3245
What do you think?
- 18,196
- 19,625
From the context, I believe we have higher standards when things are being moved into/out of Tier 2 and above.
We don't go down to the level of detail on adding/removing abilities which, to some extent, have a potency on that scale.
My preferred treatment would be to look at the rest of the character's arsenal, and determine whether it's a notable difference to that. A character with largely mundane abilities getting Resistance to High 1-B Existence Erasure would merit higher scrutiny, while a 2-B character who already has 20 abilities on that scale getting Lightning Manipulation added because they did it in the background of one scene wouldn't.
- 177,446
- 90,370
- Thread starter
- #2,192
Please clarify your viewpoints regarding the distinction between the evaluation of high character tiers and the evaluation of the powers and abilities of characters with high tiers. For some reason it did not come across clearly to me.
- 16,968
- 11,315
Few minutes ago, an user changed Cyn 3-A rating to Low 2-C and Uzi profile in the same way
however, i don't believe the user had ill intentions, because while the profile mentions the word that would warrant Low 2-C, we decided in my CRT that it should be 3-A instead of Low 2-C because of some details in the verse
however, i don't believe the user had ill intentions, because while the profile mentions the word that would warrant Low 2-C, we decided in my CRT that it should be 3-A instead of Low 2-C because of some details in the verse
Last edited:
- 18,196
- 19,625
I think ratings should always face heightened scrutiny, while abilities should face heightened scrutiny when the character has few high-tiered abilities.Please clarify your viewpoints regarding the distinction between the evaluation of high character tiers and the evaluation of the powers and abilities of characters with high tiers. For some reason it did not come across clearly to me.
- 1,007
- 317
So do we remove the edits or do we keep them?
- 1,007
- 317
So then we give them a second warning I assume?
- 5,410
- 4,851
This shit:
vsbattles.fandom.com
Tell OP to move it to FC/OC
Johnny Whistler
Johnny Whistler is a human-vampire hybrid, the son of Richard Whistler (son of Abraham Whistler) and the vampire Lilith, making him the nephew of the Daywalker, Blade. Trained in both military and vampire-hunting disciplines, Johnny is one of the most dangerous supernatural combatants alive...
vsbattles.fandom.com
Tell OP to move it to FC/OC
