• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

While I agree with this, you ought not do this. You aren't an administrator and lack that kind of authority, much less to make that decision unilaterally. Be mindful in the future.
I mean yes I don't usually take ban decision, but ant did said if necessary I can , if it's wrong I'll stop then. Apologies.
 
I mean yes I don't usually take ban decision, but ant did said if necessary I can , if it's wrong I'll stop then. Apologies.
No worries. Enacting a ban decision that's already been reached but not applied is fine also, for the record. In this case I think the conclusion was basically self evident but it still must be decided upon.
 
While I agree with this, you ought not do this. You aren't an administrator and lack that kind of authority, much less to make that decision unilaterally. Be mindful in the future.
Personally, if you're able to, I think it's reasonable and correct to ban someone who is actively posting inappropriate content, if only to stop them from doing it immediately.

The decision can always be reverted later, but I think the alternative (being afraid to take action) has potentially far worse consequences.
 
Guy removed a KE rating and replaced an accepted calculation with his own without linking a CRT.
He has made 2 CRTs attempting to downgrade the KE but they have only been accepted by CGMs so far. I have also pointed out how WoG from the director himself for Puss' height should be more reliable than an in universe approximation from another character.
Also, he attempted to upgrade Death to Class M using very flimsy reasoning from the second CRT.
 
This user has been talked/warned to by other users not to change profiles without CRT's and should be fully aware that this is rule breaking.
 
@ARCH0207 seems to have self-reverted their edits before you mentioned it here. 🙏

 
Well, our staff, including myself, have limited time available, and is largely overworked already, so we tend to prioritise what seems most important. 🙏
 
Well, our staff, including myself, have limited time available, and is largely overworked already, so we tend to prioritise what seems most important. 🙏
I understand completely and no one is obligated to evulate anything. Just this isnt the first time they have applied changes that were unapproved. Hopefully them seeing themselves here will be a wakeup call, in place of some instruction or warning cause they dont seem malicious to me at all.
 
Just a note to please always make certain to rewind the edits to the saved state pages were in right before vandalism in them started. 🙏

 
Should Ryogi's page be locked since she's Tier 1? And then the whole debacle of the Humongous Nasuverse revision bein worked on.
 
iirc nasuverse profiles were allowed to be back with every profile being locked, idk why that didnt happen yet 🥀
 

Could be Islamophobic

"and hates Islam"
 

Could be Islamophobic

"and hates Islam"
I'd say that's pretty islamophobic.
 
Whathever the **** this is.
 
Thank you for helping out. 🙏❤️
 
Not sure if this was approved or not, but they only changed the tier and didn't add any justification.

 
Back
Top