• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

And now your favorite ROBLOX character is Midline 7-C to maybe higher. John EBG Potential Upgrade.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Arkansalter2

He/Him
Messages
8,181
Reaction score
2,638
I'm about tired of the baseline. How about we raise our favorite character, John EBG, up some, via supporting feats?
As from this calc from fellow roblo supporter Mr. Embalmer. Now he brought up a few issues with the Lava/Volcanic Eruption calc. He said that this ran off the silly assumption that the explosion comes from the ground up but we can't use it because the explosion might be coming from thin air, as a multitude of other spells are formulated from thin air. But.. I disagree with that for a few reasons.

Why Volcanic Eruption Should Be Used.
Heres the move in question.
1. It's called Volanic Eruption. Should already imply that the explosion comes from the ground up.
2. Lets look up what eruption means. Erupt: (of a volcano) become active and eject lava, ash, and gases. Now since a volcano is constantly pointing up, I wouldn't see anything wrong with it.
3. The after flames on the ground after the move was performed. Big duh.
4. The knockback. The move knocks other opponents up. That should be a pretty quick duh that the move comes from underground.
5. We have absolutely no way to prove that it comes from thin air. That's false equivalence.

As we can see in this video, you cannot activate the move in the air so that's an automatic no. You can only activate it on the ground.
Even if you activate the move on the corner of a platform, the explosion would just shift over.
But what does this mean, Arkan?
This means that since we have no way to prove that it comes from thin air, we would just have to use the Volcanic Eruption end of John EBG. If that's still somehow not possible, it should be accepted as a supporting feat as an upscale.
But how would the town level be backed up? Well..

Supporting Feats: Explosion Element
Introducing... The Explosion Element. Our supporting feats
The explosion element is capable of causing entire server devastation within moments. It can be deadly in games too. Let me show ya.
The Following move is called Concentrated Blast. User casts a strong blast that will make a crater on the surface below. Now you would need a pretty decent amount of PSI in order to create a crater of stone.


The next move is called Combustion. User quickly absorbs all projectiles and uses the damage from those projectiles to create a stronger close-range explosion. Now this move is able to just send rock and stuff flying out of the ground and create an opaque smoke cloud as well.


The final move is called Shattering Eruption. User steams in rage before releasing an ultimate explosion at their mouse position. This move can send rock just flying upward instead of a crater, which implies that the move likely comes from like some feet below the ground, although I'm not 100% sure of that.
.

Supporting Feat: Fire's Hell's Core
Still? No 7-C? Alright. Introducing the fire element. Specifically.. Hell's Core. User begins erupting multiple columns of fire leading up to an obliterating fire explosion that deals massive damage. B r u h .
I'm not recording this on xbox since the explosion is so vast but I'll let you guys see it for yourself. Explosions nor fire isn't environmental destruction either sooo.. I have zero clue who's gonna calc this massive thing.


Now mind you, all of these moves are much stronger in damage than Volcanic Eruption so big lmao on that part.

I did all this just so the Lava's Volcanic Eruption feat would get accepted. I think John EBG deserves it. Now if he gets a lot higher than what I expected him to... lmao.
 
Last edited:
tier 8 tops
image.png
 
Stats upgrades and amps should probably be included in the profile with a "higher" rating + listing the increase amount (both in the AP and speed justification and Notes section like what you did with the scaling chain). Player is also capable of moving twice as fast when sprinting and can reduce damage by 50% when blocking (unfortunately doesn't stack with shielding spells 80% reduction since you can't block while using them).
 
I also feel like we could push for higher lightspeed scaling with the solar element since it seems to manipulate solar energy (sunlight -> light speed)

we do ofc need the scan for it manipulating real solar energy but I'm confident that's possible
 
I also feel like we could push for higher lightspeed scaling with the solar element since it seems to manipulate solar energy (sunlight -> light speed)

we do ofc need the scan for it manipulating real solar energy but I'm confident that this is possible
That's probably not nearly enough evidence for lightspeed scaling.

I'd encourage you to read our standards on it.
 
Yeah I know, that's why I said we should look more into it.
Funnily enough, we had SOL as possibly speed rating before due to light element and spectrum element, but not much supporting them being actual light. The Sub-Rel feat comes from Refraction, which was calced at said speed.
This is the bare minimum, considering the fact that the player can dodge attacks from the likes of the light element, spectrum element, and the solar element. How that would factor or be calced is beyond my scope.
 
Has 24 hours passed?
No but the rule previously stated by AThe1412 only applies to major revisions like the one Embalmer did.
This is a minor revision and I've made minor revisions before without the 24h grace period after staff approved of the revision.
As seen here and here.
 
No but the rule previously stated by AThe1412 only applies to major revisions like the one Embalmer did.
This is a minor revision and I've made minor revisions before without the 24h grace period after staff approved of the revision.
As seen here and here.
The 24 hour grace period is specifically for minor revisions.
Normal revisions use a 48 hour grace period instead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top