This argument is extremely weak for multiple reasons, and like I mentioned earlier, it’s an overly simplified way of understanding the cosmology. But I guess it has to be tackled now to avoid the thread getting closed in four months like the last one.
For starters, that stance is based on a clear case of cherry-picking and a hasty generalization — because it’s drawing the conclusion that everything operates under the same conceptual framework based on literally
one decontextualized line of dialogue, while ignoring the broader context and all the information we have about the evolutionary path.
Lambdadelta, in her memoirs, explains quite clearly that the ultimate goal of 07th Expansion’s cosmological journey is to reach a state of pure nothingness, free from all metaphysical restrictions — in other words, to achieve absolute free will, to no longer be limited by anything: to become, essentially, one with God (apotheosis)
You say “as you still have restrictions, you're still a part of the Witch Domain,” but it’s obvious that everything short of Creatorhood is subject to “restrictions” — precisely because
Creatorhood represents absolute omnipotence within this fictional universe. To pretend that this fact alone proves that everything along the journey belongs to a single framework is, quite frankly, absurd. By that logic, we’d have to downgrade literally any fictional verse that includes an omnipotent absolute being/state in its cosmology, because everything below that being would inherently have restrictions, and therefore, by this same reasoning, the entire cosmology would be one single framework aimed at evolving into God.
Sounds incredibly stupid, doesn’t it?
The important point here is that literally ANY cosmology can be represented as a hierarchical succession of planes.
Let’s use DC Comics as an example to explain this point, though it could really be any tier 0 verse.
In DC,
the Orrery of Worlds, the Bleedspace, Limbo, the Monitor Sphere, among others, appear on Morrison’s Multiversity map as a hierarchical chain leading to the Overvoid, which is the void lacking all narratives.
Does that mean all these planes share a single ontological framework?
Obviously not; it’s a narrative simplification meant to convey a global view of the cosmology.
This is exactly the same case. Lambdadelta states that all beings on the evolutionary path can be generalized as occupying a specific position between the two poles of being carried by fate and create fate, but that’s nothing more than a simplification meant to explain how humans are beings with infinite limitations inherent to their existence, and that the Creator is an entity that is beneath nothing, while witches are those who journey toward that nothingness.
It’s currently
accepted on the wiki that the world of witches trivializes the human world via an R>F relation, qualifying as 1-A. Meanwhile,
Featherine’s world is directly and blatantly said to trivialize the world of witches in the same way that the witches’ world trivializes the human world — which is literally a 1:1 description of High 1-A:
“Characters or objects who transcend 1-A characters in the same vein that 1-A characters transcend the rest of the system.”
Based on the very logic already accepted for the verse, how is it possible that Featherine’s world shares a conceptual framework with the witches’ world, if it transcends it in the exact same way a 1-A realm transcends all lower tiers? Isn’t that a direct contradiction of that idea?
That entire argument falls apart on its very basis.