• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Grand Priest layered existence erasure

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
693
Reaction score
180
Grand Priest needs to have layered existence erasure as he can erase any angels including Vados and Whis



VAdos + Whis (manga) = resist Hakai


Possibly Resistance to:
Deconstruction, Soul Destruction, Matter Destruction & Existence Erasure (History; Should be superior to Vados and Whis as a fellow angel, who could resist the clash between Beerus and Champa that potentially had Destruction energy)
 
I think because the Resistance is listed as a possibly, the layer has to be the same way.

"Existence Erasure (Possibly 1 Layer. Can erase even those such as the Angels like Whis and Vados, who potentially resisted Destruction Energy in a clash between 2 GoDs)"

Or something to this extent.
 
Last edited:
What did we tell you about putting out threads that are sloppy and have barely any effort put into it? If you at least wait a little bit and discussed it more, you honestly could have made this thread even better.
Wasnt it only about the universe being infinite in size? Anyway, you disagree or no
 
seems fair

but I think it would have been better to have done this with the help of more people
 
What did we tell you about putting out threads that are sloppy and have barely any effort put into it? If you at least wait a little bit and discussed it more, you honestly could have made this thread even better.
ok but this one is not controversial
 
That's not the point. Releasing threads willy nilly without consulting anyone or even mentioning it beforehand is simply never a good strategy. And it's not like he hasn't been told this before, which means he simply didn't respect us telling him that and refused to listen.
THat only applies to the infinite universe
 
THat only applies to the infinite universe
No, no it doesn't. It applies to any and all threads that may be controversial, and even for ones that may not be controversial, consulting more knowledgeable people both on the site and on the verse is still something you should've done. Throwing out threads when you're not even entirely sure how the site functions yet is practically a disaster waiting to happen.


Also I infact asked a question in the general discussion but nobody responded
You waited a whole 58 minutes, at a time when a lot of users may not be active or online. If that is the extent of your patience may I please request you never do a thread again?
 
No, no it doesn't. It applies to any and all threads that may be controversial, and even for ones that may not be controversial, consulting more knowledgeable people both on the site and on the verse is still something you should've done. Throwing out threads when you're not even entirely sure how the site functions yet is practically a disaster waiting to happen.



You waited a whole 58 minutes, at a time when a lot of users may not be active or online. If that is the extent of your patience may I please request you never do a thread again?
Bro me making thread doesnt mean the world gonna end. Just let me adapt
 
Bro me making thread doesnt mean the world gonna end. Just let me adapt
You can 'adapt' more easily by asking questions and listening instead of just doing whatever you want, but I digress. You've already revealed your unwillingness to do that.
 
This seems a bit sparse for layered EE, would've hoped for a bit more than just the page.

Then again I'm not some geezer in this site who has seen all and has seen less get approved.

I'm here for Li Qiye upgrades.
 
He made a thread which he has the right to do. Saying like "Never do it again" , "He didn't do what we say" , "Never do a thread again" lmao.

It might not suit your plans and it might not be a good strategy overall, but that doesn't change it.
I mean yeah, or else this would've been shut down. Doesn't really solve the issues with it which he outright refuses to acknowledge which is even more alarming than the thread itself
 
He wanted to create a thread and he did it. You can be sad or mad about it, but he did nothing wrong. Still no reason to just come to this thread and blame him for such things.
Lastly, this is happening a lot here, they should stop trying to ban others from doing it, there is no rule that prevents only one from doing a crt and they always treat people badly for doing a crt, if these attitudes continue they will have to be denounced.
 
Lastly, this is happening a lot here, they should stop trying to ban others from doing it, there is no rule that prevents only one from doing a crt and they always treat people badly for doing a crt, if these attitudes continue they will have to be denounced.
What are you talking about? Nobody is trying to ban anyone.
 
I check staffs are active but they only review specifc verses like hsr and opm. Is dragon ball unpopular here?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top