• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Goku is outerversal

Tuxidoe_Redo said:
Ye I do

When an argumentation is entailed to be deductively invalid, a principle known as the Invalidity's Principle can be applicable here. The invalidity's principle asserts that an inference step with actually true premises and
an actually false conclusion must be invalid. A perfect example of thiws is inference step B. We established that the conclusion doesn't guarantee any logical truth even if granted one for the premises, and hence this is rendered logically invalid. Therefore, we can apply the Invalidity's Principle.



There's still more stuff like this. Just join Dripsauce's discord server, link at his youtube channel
Click to expand...

No
 
@Johner2133451 Don't you dare join that discord John !! It's brainrot than that toilet man whole series
and pls tell me you don't believe in his crap right John ?
 
Pixy said:
@Johner2133451 Don't you dare join that discord John !! It's brainrot than that toilet man whole series
and pls tell me you don't believe in his crap right John ?
Click to expand...
Toilet man series? You mean Skibidi Toilet? Stuff is goated bro, even a movie is being made by Michael Bay
 
Tuxidoe_Redo said:
Tron is a high tier, well known discord debater. He has a server dedicated of teaching newbies on debating

Here's an example of it:

Formal Logic
============================================================================
In short terms, formal logic deals with the deductive validity of relationships and inference steps/argumentations. This is evaluated using mathematical symbols and syllogisms. Deductive logic is the systematic evaluation of arguments for internal cogency, with the internal cogency being dealt with here being logical validity. A logical validity is formed when a premise AND conclusion is true, which would form a deductively valid argumentation. When this is established, it is logically impossible for the premise to be true and the conclusion to be false.
Speaking of which, when the premise is true and the conclusion is entailed to be false, this would form a deductively invalid argumentation. In this case, your conclusion doesn't guarantee any logical truth/truth values even if granted for the premise. Let's go ahead and look at some examples of this.

A
(1) Either Bob is at school or he is at BestBuy
(2) Bob is not at school
(3) Bob is at BestBuy

Looking at this inference step, we can see that this is clearly a deductively valid argumentation. A1 and A2 both entail a logical truth logically following to the conclusion, which also guarantees a logical truth. Therefore, there's no possible reason for A3 to be false.
But what about one that IS NOT deductively valid? Let's take a look.

B

(1) All Republican voters support capital punishment.
(2) Jo supports capital punishment.
So (3) Jo is a Republican voter.

This is clearly logically invalid. Even if B1 and B2 are true, B3 doesn't logically follow from all Republican voters supporting capital punishment. This conclusion doesn't guarantee a truth value and hence this inference step is deductively invalid.
Click to expand...
This is taught to people in high school.

If you have to learn this. It means you haven't gone into high school or a literal kid
 
TheGreatJedi13 said:
I will not believe that unless you have proof. Since you're the one that claimed that many are like that
Click to expand...
I can already see people like Johnner, Shar, Optimus Prime dude and FinePoint (who is a staff btw) has zero knowledge on debating terms
 
Tuxidoe_Redo said:
I can already see people like Johnner, Shar, Optimus Prime dude and FinePoint (who is a staff btw) has zero knowledge on debating terms
Click to expand...
And someone who does not know fallacies can commit a fallacy.
Simply knowing doesn't mean they can apply it.
And not being aware of its term doesn't mean they cannot apply it.

lest you wanna argue basketball players can't shoot a ball because they do not have the knowledge and term that is present in geometry to perform their shots
 
TheGreatJedi13 said:
And someone who does not know fallacies can commit a fallacy.
Simply knowing doesn't mean they can apply it.
And not being aware of its term doesn't mean they cannot apply it.

lest you wanna argue basketball players can't shoot a ball because they do not have the knowledge and term that is present in geometry to perform their shots
Click to expand...
How does this relate? We are on the dialect if users here having epistemology on debating terms or no, not that they know how to use it like this:

(P ∧ Q) → S [Hypothetical Syllogism | P1, P2
 
Tuxidoe_Redo said:
I can already see people like Johnner, Shar, Optimus Prime dude and FinePoint (who is a staff btw) has zero knowledge on debating terms
Click to expand...
Debating terms has nothing to do with your nonsensical mathematical shit.
No ones buys your shit bro, you're the only laughing stock here.
 
Tuxidoe_Redo said:
Here's a REAL example of what mathematical debater looks like (Tegz is one)

Click to expand...

Damn this guy look smart and use some fancy words but I doubt he has Degree Passing Certificate at least
I like how you and him keep bragging you better than everyone else I get it kid behavior but seriously in f####ing Power Scaling Debate !?
Nobody will clap their hand pop up balloon because You're so good at power scaling debate even tho your long ass wall of no context will get ignore by Mathematician and Scientist themselve

​

 
yall-really-saying-that-goku-is-boundless-when-it-was-v0-9nf7gdxtc2ae1.png
 
Pixy said:
Damn this guy look smart and use some fancy words but I doubt he has Degree Passing Certificate at least
I like how you and him keep bragging you better than everyone else I get it kid behavior but seriously in f####ing Power Scaling Debate !?
Nobody will clap their hand pop up balloon because You're so good at power scaling debate even tho your long ass wall of no context will get ignore by Mathematician and Scientist themselve

​

Click to expand...
I'm not even supporting Tegz lol. He's a marvel goon that thinks marvel atoms is beyond tiering so it solos Dragon Ball + fiction
 
Tuxidoe_Redo said:
THere's nothing mathematical what I did except that joke
Click to expand...
And… how does that actually prove your point?
By the way, I’ve been searching for the word ‘care’ in this anywhere, oh I didn't find it, it's really fortunate for me.
Pixy said:
Damn this guy look smart and use some fancy words but I doubt he has Degree Passing Certificate at least
I like how you and him keep bragging you better than everyone else I get it kid behavior but seriously in f####ing Power Scaling Debate !?
Nobody will clap their hand pop up balloon because You're so good at power scaling debate even tho your long ass wall of no context will get ignore by Mathematician and Scientist themselve

​

Click to expand...
More like the mathematicians and scientists will read it and they will immediately
retire. I mean, why bother with real research when he clearly solved the secret of nothing using nonsensical shit.
 
Shar122 said:
And… how does that actually prove your point?
By the way, I’ve been searching for the word ‘care’ in this anywhere, oh I didn't find it, it's really fortunate for me.

More like the mathematicians and scientists will read it and they will immediately
retire. I mean, why bother with real research when he clearly solved the secret of nothing using nonsensical shit.
Click to expand...
You said I do math for arguments so I refuted that, mention I do not. Bro thinks he's Gogo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Adestral
Goku is tier 0
Replies
5
Views
766
OMsHanT69
OMsHanT69
Adestral
Can Goku get tier 0 ?
Replies
11
Views
1K
Jin2188
Jin2188
Vesxpura
Goku tier 1 upscale
Replies
4
Views
433
Vesxpura
Vesxpura
Scaling Naruto to boundless and outerversal.
Replies
3
Views
1K
KYL9494
KYL9494
Hecky2222
Proving Yogiri Tier 1-A and Debunking Counterarguments one by one
Replies
17
Views
2K
AthelChan
AthelChan
Back
Top