• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Janemba Ajout dragon ball

Messages
189
Reaction score
99
    • Here in this panel, it shows us that he disturbs the laws of reality that are governed in the afterlife, such as causality, time, gravity, etc. But my goal today is to attribute a manipulation of causality to Janemba, given that this law is governed in the afterlife, because without causality there is neither continuity, nor logic, nor time. And for an even stronger backup, which should provide causal manipulation and probability manipulation for Janemba, his presence brings the dead back without ritual, divine will, or mechanism, so no coherent cause. And we know well that the dead in Dragon Ball follow a logical and strict rule, contrary to Dragon Ball, divine decision (Kaioshin, Enma), so Shenron cannot cancel this effect, especially since it is improbable given that the necessary conditions for a dead person to revive are specific, but Janemba did not respect those conditions. Thus, logically and normally, the natural probability that a dead person revives spontaneously without cause. You would tell me that the cause is Janemba, but it is even more subtle than that. Yes, the energy of Janemba is the source of this effect, but it's not just the fact that an effect has a 'source' that makes the causality valid. The effect must be a coherent consequence, and an explicit and justifiable link must be possible between the cause and the effect. However, here the link between 'evil energy' and 'resurrection of the dead' has no logical foundation. So, the conclusion is that Janemba produces an effect that his energy is not supposed to provoke in the causal system of Dragon Ball.

    • The effect exists but the logical chain of causes leading to it is broken, absent, and incoherent, thus ultimately forcing an effect from an illogical cause. Even though there is a 'cause,' the fact that Janemba triggers an effect that no one could normally and logically initiate, Shenron who can do nothing about the event being against all logic and natural chance means that Janemba manipulates the probability of such an event occurring to the point of making it certain. The conclusion is that Janemba is the immediate cause of the return of the dead. However, this does not restore normal causality because his energy produces an illogical, unstructured, and unfounded effect according to the rules of Dragon Ball. Therefore, this implies a manipulation of causality (the effect exceeds its natural framework) and a passive manipulation of probabilities (the improbable effect becomes automatic).
    • and potentially Acausality type 4


 
I can't understand any of this, seriously, this assumption is too extraordinary that went beyond what scans, statements and feats suppose to convey, like, i can say that, almost baseless assumption, so i disagree, for now
 
I see where this is going kinda but I'd need to rewatch the movie. You should form this better honestly. These scans right now aren't in full context for people to read properly. I'm neutral for right now since it's already labeled Law Manip on page but wording can frame it as Causality Manipulation.
 
I can't understand any of this, seriously, this assumption is too extraordinary that went beyond what scans, statements and feats suppose to convey, like, i can say that, almost baseless assumption, so i disagree, for now
No hypothesis I base myself on what I saw and that is the causality and manip probability I just have a rhetoric that must bother you otherwise there is nothing hypothetical knowing that law manip a manip causa as possible use and reality warping change the probability
 
Are you saying that Janemba through messing with the laws of reality and distortion of space time is messing with Causality?
 
Ok I think I’m starting to get it now

Lemme know if I got it?

The normal means of how people resurrect/brought back to the living realm are being disrupted by Janemba screwing with the natural laws and Thus, the natural probability that a dead person revives spontaneously without cause. And we know that the cause isn’t directly Janemba.
 
Idk why screwing with Afterlife law and brought dead people back to life have anything to do with probability and causality
 
Idk why screwing with Afterlife law and brought dead people back to life have anything to do with probability and causality
Read I explained it and for causality my argument this is based not only on the dead it is also based on the facts that he made a mess in the laws of reality governing the afterlife and I explain why causality is part of it, especially since the dead is very explicit I explain to you that there is no other way to bring you the dead there are conditions and the probability that he revives is not natural because normal it is impossible
 
Ok I think I’m starting to get it now

Lemme know if I got it?

The normal means of how people resurrect/brought back to the living realm are being disrupted by Janemba screwing with the natural laws and Thus, the natural probability that a dead person revives spontaneously without cause. And we know that the cause isn’t directly Janemba.
Basically the laws that govern the reality of the afterlife janemba disturb them, the laws that govern this reality are several but I only talk about causality and I simply explain why causality is present and for the dead it's other things I explained that reliving the dead is impossible in dragon ball because there are specific rules if you don't go through that then it's impossible to revive them outside janemba just his energy caused the resurrection of the dead the probability that he could have revived it's dead was 0 since he is not going through the rules so he passively and unconsciously manipulated the probability
 
This thread is not gonna pass unfortunately.

Based on what I’m seeing here:
Regarding Causality, it won’t pass because it’s entire reason is more or less appeal to reality. The OP states that Janemba is disturbing the laws of reality that are governed in the afterlife such as causality, time, gravity, etc was affected. The thing is sufficient evidence needs to be submitted to substantiate the claim.

The OP states
“causality to Janemba, given that this law is governed in the afterlife, because without causality there is neither continuity, nor logic, nor time.”

This is an appeal to reality. Fiction is not reality. Dragon ball itself would need to sufficiently indicate and prove this. DB would need to prove that the laws of the afterlife govern causality in some way and that without causality this no logic, time, etc. The scans neither reflect nor prove this. The OP just states it as if it’s a fact and that because Janemba messed with the laws of the world then he messed with causality and the like as well. He doesn’t establish how or why causality would be influenced within the context of dragon ball. Just used real life theoretical concepts and physics to explain why that would be the case. In any event solid no for causality

As for probability. No to that as well. Janemba making something impossible happen can quite literally be anything else. Reality warping alone would cover it. Probability would rely on their being multiple possibilities and Janemba just making the most unlikely one happen and Janemba having sufficient context of making unlikely scenarios or impossible scenarios happen at will. That context is missing. Janemba simply flipped the world on its head by crashing the laws of the afterlife and then unlikely scenarios started happening. Yeah no shit they start happening if you got rid of the laws of the afterlife. There is no probability manipulation here either.
 
This thread is not gonna pass unfortunately.

Based on what I’m seeing here:
Regarding Causality, it won’t pass because it’s entire reason is more or less appeal to reality. The OP states that Janemba is disturbing the laws of reality that are governed in the afterlife such as causality, time, gravity, etc was affected. The thing is sufficient evidence needs to be submitted to substantiate the claim.

The OP states
“causality to Janemba, given that this law is governed in the afterlife, because without causality there is neither continuity, nor logic, nor time.”

This is an appeal to reality. Fiction is not reality. Dragon ball itself would need to sufficiently indicate and prove this. DB would need to prove that the laws of the afterlife govern causality in some way and that without causality this no logic, time, etc. The scans neither reflect nor prove this. The OP just states it as if it’s a fact and that because Janemba messed with the laws of the world then he messed with causality and the like as well. He doesn’t establish how or why causality would be influenced within the context of dragon ball. Just used real life theoretical concepts and physics to explain why that would be the case. In any event solid no for causality

As for probability. No to that as well. Janemba making something impossible happen can quite literally be anything else. Reality warping alone would cover it. Probability would rely on their being multiple possibilities and Janemba just making the most unlikely one happen and Janemba having sufficient context of making unlikely scenarios or impossible scenarios happen at will. That context is missing. Janemba simply flipped the world on its head by crashing the laws of the afterlife and then unlikely scenarios started happening. Yeah no shit they start happening if you got rid of the laws of the afterlife. There is no probability manipulation here either.
In this case, there are simple effects that lead to causes; causality is present. There is a thing called universal law, even if it is not proven, the laws are present. Otherwise, how can we prove that a character is 3D by default?
 
This thread is not gonna pass unfortunately.

Based on what I’m seeing here:
Regarding Causality, it won’t pass because it’s entire reason is more or less appeal to reality. The OP states that Janemba is disturbing the laws of reality that are governed in the afterlife such as causality, time, gravity, etc was affected. The thing is sufficient evidence needs to be submitted to substantiate the claim.

The OP states
“causality to Janemba, given that this law is governed in the afterlife, because without causality there is neither continuity, nor logic, nor time.”

This is an appeal to reality. Fiction is not reality. Dragon ball itself would need to sufficiently indicate and prove this. DB would need to prove that the laws of the afterlife govern causality in some way and that without causality this no logic, time, etc. The scans neither reflect nor prove this. The OP just states it as if it’s a fact and that because Janemba messed with the laws of the world then he messed with causality and the like as well. He doesn’t establish how or why causality would be influenced within the context of dragon ball. Just used real life theoretical concepts and physics to explain why that would be the case. In any event solid no for causality

As for probability. No to that as well. Janemba making something impossible happen can quite literally be anything else. Reality warping alone would cover it. Probability would rely on their being multiple possibilities and Janemba just making the most unlikely one happen and Janemba having sufficient context of making unlikely scenarios or impossible scenarios happen at will. That context is missing. Janemba simply flipped the world on its head by crashing the laws of the afterlife and then unlikely scenarios started happening. Yeah no shit they start happening if you got rid of the laws of the afterlife. There is no probability manipulation here either.
I stop you right there, manipulating probability means making the improbable probable, so it has nothing to do with what you mentioned. Janemba made the improbable probable since bringing the dead back to life without the rules opposing it has a zero chance; you should know that.
 
In this case, there are simple effects that lead to causes; causality is present. There is a thing called universal law, even if it is not proven, the laws are present. Otherwise, how can we prove that a character is 3D by default?
Besides, how do you prove gravity, or radiation, or even space, the atmosphere, air etc. in a fiction? Your appeal to reality does not work on universal laws.
 
In this case, there are simple effects that lead to causes; causality is present. There is a thing called universal law, even if it is not proven, the laws are present. Otherwise, how can we prove that a character is 3D by default?
So regarding this. Yes, we can say and agree that by default, things such as space, time, Logic, physics, causality, or whatever you have are set up in the verse. And that every verse would have these things in one way or another, otherwise it would not function properly.

The problem thereafter stems from you claiming that because Janemba was affecting this “the laws of the afterlife,” he was thus also affecting that “the causality of the world as well,” and your reason to substantiate this is based on real-world theories and principles. This is where your argument falls flat because for you to prove Janemba can affect causality, you’d need to substantiate that causality is governed/affected/manipulated by the laws of the afterlife, IN THE CONTEXT OF DB, not by theoretics of real life.

Yes, there are effects and there are causes
Yes, causality is or at least should be present in the verse by default

But to say causality was manipulated or affected when the laws were overturned, just based on causality being present by universal law principles and nothing else, is at least a stretch and at most a fallacious interpretation
Besides, how do you prove gravity, or radiation, or even space, the atmosphere, air etc. in a fiction? Your appeal to reality does not work on universal laws.
Again, even if we agree to this idea of universal constants and universal laws, we can’t just say that

“Janemba changed the laws of the afterlife,” so causality was also affected. Not because of anything indicated or substantiated in DB, but because of real-life principles on how universal laws and constants work.

I stop you right there, manipulating probability means making the improbable probable, so it has nothing to do with what you mentioned. Janemba made the improbable probable since bringing the dead back to life without the rules opposing it has a zero chance; you should know that.
Let me pose a question to you.

What is the probability of every human on the planet being able to bleed blue instead of red from now on? Zero, right? Literally impossible. So, if someone, like say, Shenron or Whis, makes it so that humans of Earth can bleed blue, would you consider that probability manipulation? Because they made it so that something that would otherwise be impossible to occur in nature now happens regularly?

You see how this looks, right?

They could have simply altered humanity's biology so that their blood turns blue. Or they could warp reality, and suddenly the color blue is altered to appear red. Or they could have altered the laws of nature to make humans bleed blue like crabs. Or they could have altered causality, making the cause of "bleeding" result in the effect of "blue coming out", or whatever have you. In all these scenarios, something that’s impossible to occur in nature happened. But just because they did that doesn’t mean the automatic default is probability manipulation, nor does it mean manipulation of probability was the specific means to achieve it.

Context matters, and you need context of Janemba specifically manipulating vectors subjected to probability, luck, chance, possibilities, variables, etc., for probability hax to be viable. Otherwise, it’s just reality warping or law manipulation, which he already has.
 
So regarding this. Yes, we can say and agree that by default, things such as space, time, Logic, physics, causality, or whatever you have are set up in the verse. And that every verse would have these things in one way or another, otherwise it would not function properly.

The problem thereafter stems from you claiming that because Janemba was affecting this “the laws of the afterlife,” he was thus also affecting that “the causality of the world as well,” and your reason to substantiate this is based on real-world theories and principles. This is where your argument falls flat because for you to prove Janemba can affect causality, you’d need to substantiate that causality is governed/affected/manipulated by the laws of the afterlife, IN THE CONTEXT OF DB, not by theoretics of real life.

Yes, there are effects and there are causes
Yes, causality is or at least should be present in the verse by default

But to say causality was manipulated or affected when the laws were overturned, just based on causality being present by universal law principles and nothing else, is at least a stretch and at most a fallacious interpretation

Again, even if we agree to this idea of universal constants and universal laws, we can’t just say that

“Janemba changed the laws of the afterlife,” so causality was also affected. Not because of anything indicated or substantiated in DB, but because of real-life principles on how universal laws and constants work.


Let me pose a question to you.

What is the probability of every human on the planet being able to bleed blue instead of red from now on? Zero, right? Literally impossible. So, if someone, like say, Shenron or Whis, makes it so that humans of Earth can bleed blue, would you consider that probability manipulation? Because they made it so that something that would otherwise be impossible to occur in nature now happens regularly?

You see how this looks, right?

They could have simply altered humanity's biology so that their blood turns blue. Or they could warp reality, and suddenly the color blue is altered to appear red. Or they could have altered the laws of nature to make humans bleed blue like crabs. Or they could have altered causality, making the cause of "bleeding" result in the effect of "blue coming out", or whatever have you. In all these scenarios, something that’s impossible to occur in nature happened. But just because they did that doesn’t mean the automatic default is probability manipulation, nor does it mean manipulation of probability was the specific means to achieve it.

Context matters, and you need context of Janemba specifically manipulating vectors subjected to probability, luck, chance, possibilities, variables, etc., for probability hax to be viable. Otherwise, it’s just reality warping or law manipulation, which he already has.
So already the argument for causality shows that you haven't read my article because the argument is not based solely on the fact that it disturbed the laws of reality; that's just a backup. Otherwise, I explain why I invite you to reread, and for probability, we give specific cases for deaths without respecting them, it's impossible, thus improbable to revive a dead person without going through the imposed rules. The fact that this made it probable is enough to give him the manipulation of probability because here it is clearly an absolute improbability since it is impossible. It’s a cosmic rule, while modifying the biology of a human is not a predefined cosmic rule like death. Therefore, your example and demystification fall flat.
 
So already the argument for causality shows that you haven't read my article because the argument is not based solely on the fact that it disturbed the laws of reality; that's just a backup. Otherwise, I explain why I invite you to reread
I read it, i still disagree. Telling me to re-read is not an argument.
and for probability, we give specific cases for deaths without respecting them, it's impossible, thus improbable to revive a dead person without going through the imposed rules. The fact that this made it probable is enough to give him the manipulation of probability because here it is clearly an absolute improbability since it is impossible. It’s a cosmic rule, while modifying the biology of a human is not a predefined cosmic rule like death. Therefore, your example and demystification fall flat.
COSMIC RULE/LAW

Great, now, what does Janemba do? He alters or manipulates the laws of this afterlife.

Reviving the dead because he "disrespects" these laws or changes a "cosmic rule" directly isn’t probability hax, it’s overriding that rule. Just because reviving the dead is "impossible" by conventional standards doesn’t mean it’s a form of probability manipulation. There are many different ways to make impossible things happen, and not all of them involve altering probability. This is certainly not that.

My analogy is logically sound. It doesn't have to involve a cosmic rule to carry the same logical essence. Altering an impossible biological trait, like blood color, doesn’t automatically equal probability manipulation, even when it defies natural law. Just because death is a cosmic law doesn’t change the core of the argument: both scenarios involve changing something previously considered unchangeable. What matters is how the change is achieved, not just that it was.

So, unless you can show me a clear instance where Janemba specifically manipulates probability or causality, not just laws or reality, then we can’t claim those abilities. Your argument relies entirely on assumptions (claiming messing with laws of the afterlife equates to warping causality of the afterlife etc), and this wiki doesn’t add abilities based on speculation.
 
This argument simply is appeal to reality and no limit fallacy, where one claimed that since cosmic rules include time, causality and other things, so if a character affect law, said character affect other things as well. Fiction isn't reality, and we grant abilities to feats, statements depend on what they show us, not what based on hypothetical theories.

In this case, the verse itself need to show that Janemba when affecting law also affect causality, time, gravity, etc.....or the verse have proofs that law governing reality in DB also includes causality, time, gravity.

About probability, make impossible thing possible is a very vague thing especially in fictions where things most of the time isn't logical at all, where simply create a fire out of nowhere could be considered making impossible possible. Make impossible possible is a very broad term in fiction which isn't strictly probability, you could say that almost every haxes we have on this wiki can be considered as such

So yeah, i'm very against this CRT
 
Back
Top