• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Removing abilities that are entirely justified from WoG (Part 1)

There's many interview as such as well, but again, Im going by what he told me, and he implied "Reddit AMA" kinds of stuff is ok while I asked about Ninjago
Which, tbf, I agree it's confusing as ****. I'll give you that. Reddit AMA are typically the same stuff as Twitter QnA. Maybe he had something specific in mind when he stated this, idk.
 
Wouldn't it be better to have one of those big crts to get the WoG out of the way? Making one profile at a time (?) like this one seems too long (like, the crt will have about 10 parts?)
 
Wouldn't it be better to have one of those big crts to get the WoG out of the way? Making one profile at a time (?) like this one seems too long (like, the crt will have about 10 parts?)
Honestly I think many small CRTs is better than one big one.

If a CRT gets too big a lot of staff simply don't bother evaluating it.
 
Again, everything regarding FSM will and should be addressed in a bigger CRT. Why do u rush things?
A big CRT will only have the same issues, it will have staff less likely to notice flaws.

I am not rushing things, only making sure things actually improve.
 
A big CRT will only have the same issues, it will have staff less likely to notice flaws.

I am not rushing things, only making sure things actually improve.
I don't think you understand how some of those things affects other characters in a way that we do need a bigger CRT to address all of them, such as the Balance and the Resistance thing
 
I don't think you understand how many of those things affects other characters in a way that we do need a bigger CRT to address all of them
I understand that chain scaling exists, but what I don't think should happen is for legit everything to be changed in a single CRT.
 
I understand that chain scaling exists, but what I don't think should happen is for legit everything to be changed in a single CRT.
the resistance thing is something that affects all EMs and isn't really based on FSM. The Balance is something that involve Overlord and that other Ninjago supporters said they would address in a CRT covering everything that needs to go or not
 
We don't need to close the CRT.

You wanna give your thoughts on this, or can I implement the changes since it seems like no new staff is interested?
Opinions may change with the change of policy. I'd like to hear confirmation from standing votes if they still agree with where they stand, and give people the chance to give new evidence since much of the old counter-evidence isn't acceptable.
 
the resistance thing is something that affects all EMs and isn't really based on FSM. The Balance is something that involve Overlord and that other Ninjago supporters said they would address in a CRT covering everything that needs to go or not
I'm still of the opinion that trying to do everything in one massive CRT will only make it hard to evaluate and discourage people from doing so.

Though maybe two or three profiles instead of one might be appropriate.
 
I'm still of the opinion that trying to do everything in one massive CRT will only make it hard to evaluate and discourage people from doing so.
I share this opinion

Well, I don't think it changes anything, since this was about removing WOG and the change just made that even more strict.
just asking to reaffirm since thread was closed and somthing major did change.
 
I'm still of the opinion that trying to do everything in one massive CRT will only make it hard to evaluate and discourage people from doing so.

Though maybe two or three profiles instead of one might be appropriate.
Hum the Balance is straight up cosmology stuff....
 
Well if nothing appicalple to this. Since staff votes seem to be the same
We don't need to close the CRT.


Opinions may change with the change of policy. I'd like to hear confirmation from standing votes if they still agree with where they stand, and give people the chance to give new evidence since much of the old counter-evidence isn't acceptable.
thoughts on applying this if nothing new for this?
 
Tbh, if you want to bring the stuff up in the new thread, it should not be an issue, since this thread is only about removing WoG, meaning that a timer is not relevant for the thread. (I may be wrong here, but I think that is allowed?)
Well I fear it would make it look like we are re-addressed the same topic in less than 3 months, which is against the wiki rules, and I don't want to make it seem like that, but I see your point
 
Well I fear it would make it look like we are re-addressed the same topic in less than 3 months, which is against the wiki rules, and I don't want to make it seem like that, but I see your point
I think that removing WOG feats and replacing those feats with other sources are probably distinct enough that it would be alright.
 
I think that removing WOG feats and replacing those feats with other sources are probably distinct enough that it would be alright.
I have many prove about FSM's Realms, It has been seen isn't one of merge realms and stated to be beyond Realms
 
I think that removing WOG feats and replacing those feats with other sources are probably distinct enough that it would be alright.
Eh ig so

Oh and for Acausality Type 4, Im pretty sure we can replace the scan with the fact FSM was born in the First Realm (like, the first ever in existence), at a point of time before the other Realms were created, including the Cloud Kingdom which controls fate
 
Eh ig so

Oh and for Acausality Type 4, Im pretty sure we can replace the scan with the fact FSM was born in the First Realm (like, the first ever in existence), at a point of time before the other Realms were created, including the Cloud Kingdom which controls fate
Also about Time is a system of cause and effect in the verse (shown in Season 7)
 
Well I fear it would make it look like we are re-addressed the same topic in less than 3 months, which is against the wiki rules, and I don't want to make it seem like that, but I see your point
we can double check but to me this feels fundmentally differnt cause this has to be removed cause of a disscuion rule change. I think you would be fine opening a crt later to try to get these things justifted again. You are using differnt agurements and supporting evdince as well.
 
Back
Top