• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The VSBW has a serious Outerversal Bloat problem

Messages
962
Reaction score
232
Yeah, I know this is a pretty heavy issue that needs to have the entire weight of the forum and mainline site team to actually make a difference but that's not what I am here today. I am not trying to change anything but just making a wider awareness by an observation that I've recently had can probably be testified by several people here.

I can be for certain that many people here can agree that the frequency of 1-A profiles has risen significantly over the lifespan of VSBW, especially these last few years. Of course, this is natural, as many new fictional universes are added and created this makes for more profiles to be added. Some happen to be belong to Outerversal level or tier 1-A because of the way they're presented in the story and vice-versa.

But there are discrepancies in data which can be observed within the tiers. With each profile having a category we can deduce just how many character profiles belong to each tier and so I am here to prove that there is in fact a 1-A bloat going around.

First, lets compare the A's of each tier. Obviously because 1-A tier is one but also to avoid clutter and bring the same message.

xInDNbu.png


Not really the best of arguments but you can still see that there is a small discrepancy on how the pie just loses consistency towards the last pie. Each tier gets dwindles in number until we bump into 2-A and 1-A, the tiers with the most prestige in their name but that's besides the point. But this is my weakest argument still.

Here's the real Deal Breaker

OIJF4Fp.png


Among the higher infinity category of power, 1-A has a particular dominance where it breaks the mold and consistency with the other tiers. Where usually the lowest tier has the highest number of participants, the next lowest and so on, the 1-A for some reason is a huge outlier to this particular order.

And I have checked, there aren't that many tiers that have such discrepancy. When there are, they aren't like how 1-A appears on this chart.

Take Tier 3 or Cosmic level for example. the major discprency is that tier 3-B (Multi-galaxy) has the lowest, not the highest, the lowest amount of entries in its category. This is the most often discrepancy I usually find within tiers but this seems more of a norm than a "discrepancy". Something that 1-A does not share as it is the opposite of what I've seen. It instead is the nearly the tier with the most entries in its category.

Why such a fuss about the Outerversal tier?

I could've easily taken a rant about any number of tiers, heck I could've gone into Low 1-C and how its bloated but I'd be lying through my teeth.

The reason why I am making a fuss about the Outerversal tier and the reason why I made this post is how easily this tier can have its rules twisted, melded and reordered because it has such an esoteric description of power. It isn't hard-coded like many other tiers like planet level or universe level, outerverse level is literally about being esoteric in power but this leads to a lot of pages seeming out of place and a bit too powerful for what they're presented? In the past, the outerversal was usually relegated to verses like Dark Tower, H.P. Lovecraft, Umeniko, Absolute Highest ends of Marvel and DC characters and so on. Verses with an extremely esoteric but also very massive cosmology with established mythos and aspects that create a massive world beyond human comprehension. Now its like every third character is 1-A for some reason.

My biggest example is the Earth-1611 Sentry page.

I am fully aware that Marvel has some genuine 1-A scaling and that some characters, especially like sentry, that are quite probable to be there... But not one argument brought there justifies a 1-A tier placement. I am not here to argue about the sentries profile but every single scan that was used as an example in the page, would make Earth-1611 Sentry into 2-A level at most rather than 1-A. Even the other stats agree so, his speed is only MTFL+ and lifting strength is Class M, very unusual for characters within the Tier 1 category in general.


I was going to bring legends star wars but I feel it has already faced enough ridicule that I didn't want to beat a dead horse over it.

Final Words

I'm not looking for any changes, arguments or pointing fingers at. I'm simply making this thread for an open discussion around 1-A tier because I feel that we need to at least talk about an underlying issue that is just going to keep getting repeated and we end up getting ridiculed for it.
 
You realize most of 1-A pages come from extremely expansive verses like Shin Megami Tensei, DC, Marvel right...? A lot of reasons for Marvel scaling also comes from specific things about cosmology that one wouldn't get at first glance like whether it involves universal abstracts and such.

I also don't really get putting 1-A on a pedestal. It's a tier like any other tier not some prestigious award with value.
 
You realize most of 1-A pages come from extremely expansive verses like Shin Megami Tensei, DC, Marvel right...? A lot of reasons for Marvel scaling also comes from specific things about cosmology that one wouldn't get at first glance like whether it involves universal abstracts and such.
If you were to remove the "Tier 1-A" category from Megami Tensei and Marvel profiles in particular (Especially the former, since its profiles have a quirk where every single demon, which makes up about 90% of the verse, has a 1-A key for its archetype non-combative state) then the category would have significantly less characters in it, yeah. I reckon less characters than there are in 3-A and even in 4-A, in point of fact. Add to that other big, long-running verses where a 1-A thing happens and then a lot of other characters scale to it, like DC or Warhammer and what have you.

I'm not really sure there is anything of substance to really engage with in this thread (No offense intended to you, of course, OP). Seems like a lot of hot air.
 
Yeah I feel like this is really a non-issue. The crux of your argument is that there are too many 1-As? Yeah cause we index a lot of 1-As.

Nobody complains when Pokemon adds one 1-A but adds a dozen tier 6s into the pool. Some verses just have proportionately more 1-As than others and that's fine.

We really need to stop treating 1-A as some sort of unobtainable tier that everyone has to bow and revere to. Almost any verse with R>F or esoteric nonsense will get 1-A, and we as users apparently gravitate towards that.
 
users apparently gravitate towards
I think this is what it boils down to. People generally like how powered verses. I personally struggle to find 1-a interesting personally, but a large amount of users really like it. There are other power scaling/ battle boarding sites that the user generally lean towards this tier or that, what we have indexed Is mostly a reflection of the interest of the users.
 
If you wanna balance the scales then start indexing obscure novels or shows that have low tier characters.

I guarantee you nobody's gonna engage them in VS threads tho.
 
Seems to me there a number of verses with vast cosmologies that scale to 1-A. Like off the top of my head the chainmen novels are all about cultivation and all that other stuff with platonic concepts and what not, which leads to every chinaman being 1-A

I have somehow found myself with several isekai verses which scale to 1-A, and almost all those instances, only a few people scale to it. But yea 1-A is a strong tier which if you look for it, you can find. Nobody cares as much if you create a verse that maxes out at mountain level.
 
nobody's gonna engage them in VS threads
I usually like the tier 8 and 9 Vs threads the most, I think we have a decently active group of people on here that keep those threads active. Dexter especially gets alot of tractions for the versus threads. Had a decent amount of Halloween and other slasher movie characters in vs threads. most the 1-a vs threads often get little tractions as well or just end up being a mistmatch or a stomp, its insanely hard to make a good interesting match for 1-a characters IMO.
 
I share your sentiment(Even if there's little to share here). What's really your point? I know some verses and pages has the most obscure and weird statements to for 1-A, but that's why we do CRT to either downgrade or upgrade some grey areas.

Anyways, what do you want us to do? Delete the tiers in which required CRT and approvals to make in the first place? This thread is purposeless and seems like a rant that we can't really do anything about it. It is what it is.

My only real proposal is to nuke VSBW entirely.
 
Many people brought some extremely good points and I can't really argue with them. Some I even agree (some disagree). I am engaging this as a conversation rather than argument, sorry If I appear as aggressive or hot-headed its just the way I write lol.

My crux of the problem is that 1-A seems to be a tier that has been wrangled to each individual page rather than being a tier that encompasses pages if that makes any sense. Like a plain example is building level. Geralt is 8-C+, no need to argue semantics around it, its cut and dry as simple as that and this can go all the way to High 1-B. With 1-A, you first need to have a solid paragraph of semantics to argue about it. Then the is debate no longer about the characters but the tier itself which defeats the purpose of the match in its entirety.

1-A isn't exactly a tier to be revered, most powerful characters usually are the most boring ass characters as well. But it does make a problem when it comes to powerscaling outside of this site. Now I might go off-topic but the main site is the biggest powerscaling site in the internet after all, it hold a massive amount of influence on the vs debating communities around the internet. If some bad actors play the 1-A like a pinball game, then bad actors also follow suit and they spread it around and when it comes to backing up their statements they fold like a pretzel.

Going on a side-tangent.

I am being honest here, some characters really don't feel like being outerversal level. (This goes for a lot of profiles in general where the highball is taken for granted) And I am not going to argue that they shouldn't be or don't belong but it has an uncanny valley to it when you see them presented when you're actually familiar with the source material.

Me and some friends once humored the idea of making base Geralt a High 6-A or Multi-Continental because it legitimately held its own against a Djinn who are easily capable of reaching that type of power. By site rules, scaling and how I've observed quite a few profiles we could've genuinely done this but we humbled ourselves and said its reaching far enough with 8-C+. Like, yeah we could've made him multi-continental but who would've bought that? Only bad actors who would genuinely be insufferable to bear.

I can instantly buy characters from H.P. Lovecraft, Marvel & DC, Umeniko, Dark Tower being 1-A because they establish characters that are inherently primoradial and beyond human comprehension. Beings that are esoteric and fitting for that tier. But seeing captain america or luke skywalker who are pretty well-established 8-C characters with 1-A keys tends to get a chuckle out of me because it is absurd no matter how you wanna put it.

Like, I don't buy 1-A chaos gods from warhammer despite legit having genuine arguments for being so. This is due to how many authors have written them so inconsistently that we really don't know if they're max around galaxy level or outerversal level. Some Warhammer 40k fans who have literally read hundreds of books would raise an eyebrow if you told them chaos gods were outerversal because they'd not even be aware of what you're talking about.

Of course I am not trying to instigate a "grain of sand is actually outerversal level of power" arguments here and this is just a personal bias.

I guarantee you nobody's gonna engage them in VS threads tho.
Brother, I have worked on Witcher and Berserk and they've been the most fun type of engagements than every single cosmic type of character ever. Grounded characters from wall to city level are among the most fun you can debate because you're actually engaging in a discussion about the characters themselves, not the name of their outerversal farts.
 
Brother, I have worked on Witcher and Berserk and they've been the most fun type of engagements than every single cosmic type of character ever. Grounded characters from wall to city level are among the most fun you can debate because you're actually engaging in a discussion about the characters themselves, not the name of their outerversal farts.
Maybe that's why I rarely go on VS threads. To me half the fun is being able to craft a meaningful argument as to why a character is a certain tier. Also all the verses you mentioned aren't niche at all. Most of the 1-As are niche. Like what the heck is Flowing Time Great Emperor? When was the last time The Fire Titan was talked about in the mainstream? The people I know who make 1-A profiles read the most esoteric sci-fi novels or 1000 chapters of a Chinese novel to find 1-A characters.

Plus, I scanned through the 1-A category page. A vast majority of them are Megami Tensei profiles, which is the most 1-A verse ever just based on vibes. Maybe give us the numbers of 1-As that are in the category and group them by verse. You'll see they are far less than the number of tier 6 verses.
 
Chinamen about to take over. They always have the most solid evidence for their bullshitery.
 
A vast majority of them are Megami Tensei profiles, which is the most 1-A verse ever just based on vibes.
Almost none of those profiles should have a 1-A rating; I don't think anyone cares about using the archetypal version of a pixie in a debate. Also, it means that just by existing in the story you are 1-A, meaning that it would lead to more meaningless profiles that no one would actually use. (Not to mention the verse already has too many profiles with misleading/straight-up wrong info.)
 
Almost none of those profiles should have a 1-A rating; I don't think anyone cares about using the archetypal version of a pixie in a debate. Also, it means that just by existing in the story you are 1-A, meaning that it would lead to more meaningless profiles that no one would actually use. (Not to mention the verse already has too many profiles with misleading/straight-up wrong info.)
I'm really confused by this argument.

Are you saying that if a verse has a 1-A cosmology and that scales to everyone in the series, it should just never have profiles? On account of what? We're never gonna use them in VS matches?
 
A wiki about power scaling indexing strong verses and presenting a bias of strong characters isn't really a problem, the profiles on the site are a product of what people on the site like to power scale. So long as they're high quality pages and are as accurate as we can make them, who really cares how much of each tier we have?

If you want to decrease the proportion of 1-A characters in relation to lower tiers, make Gilmore Girls or Glee profiles or something.
 
Are you saying that if a verse has a 1-A cosmology and that scales to everyone in the series, it should just never have profiles? On account of what? We're never gonna use them in VS matches?
I'm saying that if the series never brings up a true archetypal version of a Pixie, then it shouldn't be added. There's no reason to say, "Because every demon is based on a universal form, we should add that form onto every profile (even though it's never brought up in series) and make sure every demon automatically scales to it." A better alternative is to have one single profile with detail on archetypes and how it connects to demons.

Also you probably misinterpreted me, but I never said anything about denying scaling for characters who won't be used in debates, just denying scaling that hasn't been proven within the source material.
 
Back
Top