- 13,826
- 19,684
Stomp.Bomp
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stomp.Bomp
Well. I am just thankful u didn't gave me W there for reasons.I'll "Bamp" you for that Leiner-04
Do you agree with Evidence #1 though, or disagree?#2 had me close to agreeing, but I'm not seeing enough evidence.
Disagree for #1 and Neutral for #2 are your votesNot really. If there are more scans about how Agyo and Ungyo are opposites/dualities, then I would agree. At the moment, I'm neutral.
YeahDisagree for #1 and Neutral for #2 are your votes
may i try to convince you to an agree on Evidence #1 for right now at least?Yeah
I mean, I'm in no rush, but if you want to, go ahead
well i am arguing for that. hmm let me try to explain it this way. The scans are talking logical contradictions of two exclusive truths existing simultaneously. something being both A and not A. What’s being rejected isn’t a physical duplication, but a contradiction of identity or status that breaks the logic of the world.Two of the same things not being able to exist at he same time, even if they're described as dualities in the verse, wouldn't qualify as dualities as we describe them on the wiki, I don't believe.
After all, duality is something, and then non-something, not duplicates of something canceling each other out.
“For this ability, dualities refer to logical dualities where the duality is between ‘A’ and ‘not A’, where A is some object or attribute.”
“Not all verses follow this logic, and many may treat things not logically considered dualities… as dualities, meaning what is and isn’t a duality can change between verses.”
Badump~Bemp
Badump~
Super series serious bump.Normal Bump
Disagree for #1 and Neutral for #2#2 had me close to agreeing, but I'm not seeing enough evidence.
Evidence #2 has 3 staff agrees.Super series serious bump.