- 9,270
- 4,372
It exists beyond the logic value of existence and non existence as another thing, that is why they don't group supernaturality as being another ramification of existence and nonexistence but something completely different.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Chinamen Nonduality
- Thread starter Robo432343
- Start date
-
- Tags
- nonduality
- 7,422
- 7,886
It would be NEP Type 2, and supernatural is never really expanded upon.
- 9,270
- 4,372
Yeah but then add the fact that Lu already is beyond the duality nonsense by virtue of being literally outside of the thing that contains all of it, you could probably wank it as
1. Reality
2. Non reality
3. Supernaturality
4. Lu
And that is not even mentioning how it is INBETWEEN the states of reality, nonreality and supernaturality https://gyazo.com/e77f237f446a7f73e06fdbc386a9fecb
Given the connotation of how it is speaked, it is very clear that it is another type of existence
- 7,422
- 7,886
He's still only outside of one logical negation; you need to be outside of all of them for Type 2.
- 9,270
- 4,372
Supernaturality IS another type of logic, that is why I mentioned it isn't just logical negations of the type of existences but clearly defined as its own, and that is not even counting the another type of logic that is the existence between the three states. Yian tian got something similar because of that.
- 7,422
- 7,886
It still wouldn't be Type 2.
Even assuming Reality, Illusion, and Supernaturality is a Three-State System, unless there is evidence in encomapsses every other dual logical state, it's not Type 2.
No, it didn't.
- 9,270
- 4,372
Also the explanation doesn't mention it but there is already another type of inbetween logic
1. Reality
2. unreality
3. Between reality and illusion (the page mentions that it is actually unreality, probably because it is just something that was expaned later)
4. Supernaturality
5. Between reality, unreality and illusion.
1. Reality
2. unreality
3. Between reality and illusion (the page mentions that it is actually unreality, probably because it is just something that was expaned later)
4. Supernaturality
5. Between reality, unreality and illusion.
- 9,270
- 4,372
Well I mean lu gets its PP beacuse of the zero dimensional wich is literally encompassing all of the previous logical states, and basically all of the cosmology except for lu (which he sees as fiction)
- 7,422
- 7,886
It was already mentioned earlier in the thread he "could" keep PP, it would just be Type 1.
- 7,422
- 7,886
I don't know why your explaining it to me, like I didn't add this verse to the wiki
- 9,270
- 4,372
Dude, the thing is that nondual is literally a compressed zero dimensional conceptual nonexistent dot that is beyond those dualities by virtue of existing prior to their creation, it takes alot of mental gymnastics to say that the thing that encompasses and gives form to those dualities don't even encompasses it. In the verse in its most absolute form, no, not everything, something trascendental which gave birth to those states (atleast 5 btw).
- 9,270
- 4,372
And this may sound annoying but there are two potential states which are inherently encompassed by lu and the zero dimensional sphere
1. Original state sefirah
2. Schoringer state of paradox (so an unknown state of existence).
1. Original state sefirah
2. Schoringer state of paradox (so an unknown state of existence).
- 15,317
- 22,633
Still PP1 via existence and nonexistence only, you need a lot of evidence to others are logical duality
Rikimarox2
He/Him- 9,159
- 5,450
I assume having True and False as a duality in the verse would kind of already qualify you for PP1-2 immediately if you go beyond them or smth?
- 15,317
- 22,633
PP1 is oke, though i think if you have proof that True abd False encompasses all thing in the verse then you can go for PP2
- 7,767
- 9,267
Its definitely pp2 like with "is" and "is not" because true and false are all encompassing inherently. The whole point of propositions is based on values of true and false (im a bit drunk rn so sorry i focused extra hard to make it coherent)
- 15,317
- 22,633
Dude what, you are drunk from drinking tea?
Anyway, definitely depend on context but well, whatever to me i guess
- 9,270
- 4,372
No you only need proof the others are other types of logical existences, You get other types of binary existences via contradictories dualities and either embodying them at the same time, or none of them. Like do you know that many logical value systems even mean?
- 2,961
- 3,609
Dw guys he drank with me. He didn't like it but who cares
