• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Paraconsistent Physiology Checklist

I see, well the what type would it be, and what about "All and Nothing"? Wouldn't that be logical negation and again it extends to all encompassing dualities. I should also mention, it has paradoxical aspects where contradictions can briefly co-exist until one is choosen as "Truth" and the other ceases to be.
All and Nothing are still only one form of logical negation. To prove that something extends to all forms of duality, you need statements of such.
 
All and Nothing are still only one form of logical negation. To prove that something extends to all forms of duality, you need statements of such.
But if dualities themselves, and literally everything in the worlds was born from the exact same thing/source and With "All and Nothing holding prominence over the things you mentioned as logical negations, would that not prove it it extends to all forms by default and thus be Type 2?
 
Last edited:
But if all dualities like the ones that I mentioned and you said are negations, and literally everything in the worlds was born from the exact same thing/source would that not prove it it extends to all forms by default and thus be Type 2?
You need to provide scans that every duality was born from this 'source', not a select few that, from what I can tell, seem to be variations of existence and nonexistence.
 
You need to provide scans that every duality was born from this 'source', not a select few that, from what I can tell, seem to be variations of existence and nonexistence.
How are possibilities and impossibilities a variation of existence and nonexistence? Also how are the others that I listed not contradictions when they are literal opposites that can't co-exist? If you're strong, you can't be weak, if you're beautiful you can't be ugly, etc? Not trying to be an a-hole, I just wanna understand

Ok here they are, all of creation was born from Chaos, defines it's existence and makes worlds' complete in their entirety. Due to it's transcendent nature, it can cause all below it to collapse and be returned to Chaos meaning that everything does come from it (This will be expanded upon, but the simplest way to describe it is that the "Real World" isn't actually the Real World, the actual real world is "Chaos"). As shown the dualities I mentioned are mere examples of the various dualities born from Chaos operating under "All and Nothing". Does that help?
 
Last edited:
How are possibilities and impossibilities a variation of existence and nonexistence? Also how are the others that I listed not contradictions when they are literal opposites that can't co-exist? If you're strong, you can't be weak, if you're beautiful you can't be ugly, etc? Not trying to be an a-hole, I just wanna understand
Negations are not opposites; they are the lack of something.

In some cases, we count Light and Darkness as negations, but in truth they are spectrums. Something can be light on one side and dark on the other side; we wouldn't classify that as PP, though.

PP only counts where, if it's not one thing, it has to be the other. At all times, something is either existent or nonexistent, for example.

Likewise, beauty is subjective, and something can be both beautiful and ugly depending on the person, so it's also not a logical negation.
Ok here they are, all of creation was born from Chaos, defines it's existence and makes worlds' complete in their entirety. Due to it's transcendent nature, it can cause all below it to collapse and be returned to Chaos meaning that everything does come from it (This will be expanded upon, but the simplest way to describe it is that the "Real World" isn't actually the Real World, the actual real world is "Chaos"). As shown the dualities I mentioned are mere examples of the various dualities born from Chaos operating under "All and Nothing". Does that help?
Right now, Chaos is sounding more like NEP Type 2, which is basically PP for Existence and Nonexistence, Dream & Reality, etc.
 
Negations are not opposites; they are the lack of something.

In some cases, we count Light and Darkness as negations, but in truth they are spectrums. Something can be light on one side and dark on the other side; we wouldn't classify that as PP, though.

PP only counts where, if it's not one thing, it has to be the other. At all times, something is either existent or nonexistent, for example.

Likewise, beauty is subjective, and something can be both beautiful and ugly depending on the person, so it's also not a logical negation.

Right now, Chaos is sounding more like NEP Type 2, which is basically PP for Existence and Nonexistence, Dream & Reality, etc.
Ok then. So I guess just Type 1 for now then since NEP2 gives Paraconsistent by default.

Also as for as if it provides any defenses it does as characters who are gifted Chaos inside of them are able to survive their existences being distorted and written out of history, this is shown multiple times, another example here as a character being a paradox themselves being tied to a past that doesn't exist and is confirmed to have survive the attempted correction.
 
Ok then. So I guess just Type 1 for now then since NEP2 gives Paraconsistent by default.
True
Also as for as if it provides any defenses it does as characters who are gifted Chaos inside of them are able to survive their existences being distorted and written out of history, this is shown multiple times, another example here as a character being a paradox themselves being tied to a past that doesn't exist and is confirmed to have survive the attempted correction.
You could count these as aspects of their NEP: History/Past, etc.
 
How are possibilities and impossibilities a variation of existence and nonexistence? Also how are the others that I listed not contradictions when they are literal opposites that can't co-exist? If you're strong, you can't be weak, if you're beautiful you can't be ugly, etc? Not trying to be an a-hole, I just wanna understand

Ok here they are, all of creation was born from Chaos, defines it's existence and makes worlds' complete in their entirety. Due to it's transcendent nature, it can cause all below it to collapse and be returned to Chaos meaning that everything does come from it (This will be expanded upon, but the simplest way to describe it is that the "Real World" isn't actually the Real World, the actual real world is "Chaos"). As shown the dualities I mentioned are mere examples of the various dualities born from Chaos operating under "All and Nothing". Does that help?
You need a specific type to count that also more related to propositions or true values if you wanna go straight to type 2. True and false or is and is not, will be type 2 even if there's nothing else. All and nothing for example doesnt quite satisfy that.
 
Light and darkness from Destiny might qualify as PP Type 1.

"To have Light, we must have Dark. This is the symmetry of the Universe." —Controversial Warlock Ulan-Tan
I propose a simple experiment—look around. You see light. You see darkness. There could not be one without the other. They are two sides of the same coin.

If it is true for these Newtonian echoes, why would it not be true of the purest, paracausal forms?

Therefore, I conclude: the reason you persecute me is not because of the symmetry. It's because of the truth beyond this truth, the truth which you most dread: if we could destroy darkness, but we had to give up our Light to do so, how many of us would make that trade?
If one accepts that the concepts of Light/Darkness and Good/Evil are not perfectly aligned, then there must necessarily exist liminal spaces where [Light = Evil] and [Darkness = Good]. If true, it would be the ultimate triumph of moral relativism. It was this (yet unspoken) tangent of Symmetry that the Vanguard found to be so threatening.
"Light cannot exist without Darkness! They are a bonded pair. They beget each other in eternal Symmetry. They are as One!"
The universe is made of Light and Darkness. These ancient forces flow through all matter and energy, in our solar system and beyond.
 
Back
Top