What would this even grant?

[TheReal7Cris]

Okay so basically lets say character A has statements around him and is proven multiple times across the series,

said statements being;

“Attacks Miss Him When They Shouldn’t, The Longer He is in a set space the more reality unravels and is trying to reject his existence, every battle he’s in is automatically decided in his favor as it’s set in stone that he will always win, causality itself bends and twists itself to please his will”

Another statement being;

“He is an anomaly, wasn’t supposed to exist at all yet he did, that being is “calamity itself””

Then again another statement stating that;

“The only way to inflict damage upon him is if and only if you can simultaneously attack him in every snapshot across an infinite no. of timelines”

again all statements being proven by said character across the series and being backed up via author statements asw

The big question being, What would this grant him?

this “situation” has been on my mind for a couple of days now and it’s about time i finally decided to try and get an answer out of it

 

[Kavliaris]

“Attacks Miss Him When They Shouldn’t, The Longer He is in a set space the more reality unravels and is trying to reject his existence, every battle he’s in is automatically decided in his favor as it’s set in stone that he will always win, causality itself bends and twists itself to please his will”

causality manipulation

“He is an anomaly, wasn’t supposed to exist at all yet he did, that being is “calamity itself””

insufficient context

“The only way to inflict damage upon him is if and only if you can simultaneously attack him in every snapshot across an infinite no. of timelines”

invulnerability from Acca 3

 

[TheReal7Cris]

insufficient context

To sum it up, he’s referred to as the literal force of calamity itself(the concept), furthermore because he originally wasn’t supposed to exist at all in a conventional sense. So Due to him existing he naturally breaks the fundamental rules that operate around all of existence itself.

 

[Kavliaris]

To sum it up, he’s referred to as the literal force of calamity itself(the concept), furthermore because he originally wasn’t supposed to exist at all in a conventional sense. So Due to him existing he naturally breaks the fundamental rules that operate around all of existence itself.

it could be AE, but need more info regarding their physiology and clarification about what the calamity is.

 

[Cielsea]

it could be AE, but need more info regarding their physiology and clarification about what the calamity is.

no it seems more like acausality type 4