• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Pokemon Discussion Thread - Red & Blue arc

Didn't I add it before he said that? If I didn't, then yeah I would've messed up.
It's just as bad because you have to wait for a CGM to approve it, then make a CRT to add it, and then add it to the verse!
How are these mutually exclusive?
If you find it wank, a normal person normally try to go against it and change it.

If you find it "beneficial", then you wouldn't be against it, but it just screams dishonesty.
 
which is hilarious given that @Executor_N0 exists.
3rXoYbl.png

Blud saw this conversation and decided that its not worth the braincell loss
 
It's just as bad because you have to wait for a CGM to approve it, then make a CRT to add it, and then add it to the verse!
Needing a CRT is news to me. I've never seen someone need one to add a calc.
If you find it wank, a normal person normally try to go against it and change it.

If you find it "beneficial", then you wouldn't be against it, but it just screams dishonesty.
I can let it help me even if I disagree with it. I planned to have Pokemon Physiology as our suit of armor around the Pokemon verse, but sure, it can be a 1-A character.
 
Needing a CRT is news to me. I've never seen someone need one to add a calc.
Then you've been living under a rock.
I can let it help me even if I disagree with it. I planned to have Pokemon Physiology as our suit of armor around the Pokemon verse, but sure, it can be a 1-A character.
This makes literally no sense.

If you think it's wrong, but you still keep it around for some "shield", then this screams dishonesty. One should go by accuracy, not some competition with unrelated franchises.
 
our suit of armor around the Pokemon verse, but sure, it can be a 1-A character.
we don't need a suit of armor bro the wiki is half-dead and is like at like 20% of its activity now than how it was in the early days of the forum, not even worth mentioning how much lower it is than how it was before forum-move. Nobody's gunning for us anymore because nobody cares.
 
This site isn't just somewhere you can blurt only YOUR thoughts onto the pages. In a huge verse like Pokemon, things need to be discussed before you attempt to write them off lol
Obviously I would've done something different if I knew you'd be THIS pissed at it. That's why BOTH my verse-specific abilities are CRTs.
 
Last edited:
Man if you pulled sth like that in a shonen jump or comic discussion you might've been in the rvr thread by now, you're just lucky we are all lazy af
 
Obviously I would've done something different if I knew you'd be THIS pissed at it. That's why BOTH my verse-specific abilities are CRTs.
Im not pissed as in personally angry lmao. I'd rather just keep this verse, thats already a mess (we dont need verse-specific abilities), with its integrity rather than ppl just trying to jank up the scaling with this Verse's equivalent of Xenoverse essentially lmao.

So yeah, don't take off and decide the canon on your own in profiles when thats not been okayed. Stick to the rules
 
Please note that I'm still working on how to handle priority moves, so comments on stuff like Quick Attack can wait.
please let me know when this is discussed or decided. Very curious, this came up in a versus thread and we didn't know the answer.
 
Okay dont even start making replies super long with split quotes
What's wrong with split quotes?
Pokemon is a completely separate case. At least for SMT, you are told the player has access to any Persona. But for a Pokemon player character what?
For Persona, you're told told that the player can have multiple Personas, not that they have all of them (even though that's pretty logical), and SMT just tells you to recruit Demons, as far as I know.

As for the Pokemon protagonists, as Bobsican already said, the main goal of most Pokemon games is to complete the entire Pokedex (and even later generations still have completing the National Dex as the final goal).
Are we gonna assume they have caught every single Pokemon available in their games? And then what, choose 6 specific Pokemon?
Yeah, why not?
Even if Pokemon is 'outdated', Theres a reason they were never made in the first place in favour of the actual NPC characters who arent so restricted by player choice. Theres loads of differences..
Still, the main reason is because it's outdated. There were plans to make pages for the protagonists years ago, but no one made them.
You aren't making a page for the trainer in that case then, and instead just cramming a whole region's worth of Pokemon into one profile. Like, if you want Pokemon to not be so outdated, lets not make dumb pages like this plz
I'd say it'd be dumb to exclude a huge portion of the protagonists' arsenal just because it'd be "silly."
 
wiki is half-dead and is like at like 20% of its activity now than how it was in the early days of the forum, not even worth mentioning how much lower it is than how it was before forum-move. Nobody's gunning for us anymore because nobody cares.
Are you really sure? Members may stop being active, but many people also become new members.
 
Back
Top