• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Jimbe's Super Water calc removal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
320
Reaction score
291
The calculation in question: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:KingTempest16/Jinbe's_Super_Water_Spout

The issue with this calc is that it makes the assumption that a quarter of the ship is 58 meters tall using a calculation for a ship from Dressrosa, and scales the size of the water spout and the distance it travelled off that.

This is way too generous, given the fact that in Eggplant "gigantic battleships" are confirmed to only have a length of 60 meters.

https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/1251600059087196200/1251709252847009914/13.jpeg?ex=6699c095&is=66986f15&hm=1734704984dd251470e9854de7bfca80d534a81d28a04d18c4c87ae44eea23a8&

Even if you want to argue that the battleships vary in size that'd just mean there is no ground for this ship being as big as the one from Dressrosa.

Therefore I believe this calculation should be removed.
 
If it already should have been removed after that thread was accepted, I'm of course fine with removing it from the verse page and any affected profiles (if there are any at this point who still use this calculation)
 
Since this is a minor revision that affects no actual profiles, I think it'll be fine to be passed once 48 hours have passed since the thread creation time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top