• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Speed? That doesn't have any calc?
Subsonic means faster than the eye so it should work fine with the description given. However, on second thought, I'd ponder at the AP since it has no references.
 
Obvious reasons
 
Obvious reasons
I was actually gonna request it to be deleted too lol
 
 

This profile should be deleted, its poor quality and I am already making another one. It was done while the supporters were still discussing.
 
The only remaining issues I can see are very minor grammar slip-ups. Why should I delete it?

We don't actually have a procedure for letting certain people reserve the idea of creating a profile, and deleting anyone else who tries. Anyone who lets someone else do that does it out of kindness, not necessity.

If you want it to be made differently, I think you just have to create a CRT.
 
The only remaining issues I can see are very minor grammar slip-ups. Why should I delete it?

We don't actually have a procedure for letting certain people reserve the idea of creating a profile, and deleting anyone else who tries. Anyone who lets someone else do that does it out of kindness, not necessity.

If you want it to be made differently, I think you just have to create a CRT.
No references,(grounds for instant deletion) missing calcs that'd make him 7-C, there's currently a long debate on certain sections of his profile, yeah I can come up with reasons to delete it. Direct the person who made it to the below thread which is currently on the fifth page of debate.

 
No references,(grounds for instant deletion)
There are. That's why I deleted it last time, but won't now.
missing calcs that'd make him 7-C
It's from scaling to Alastor, who is already established as Low 7-C (the tier actually on the page).
, there's currently a long debate on certain sections of his profile, yeah I can come up with reasons to delete it. Direct the person who made it to the below thread which is currently on the fifth page of debate.
And those can revise it, once it's over.
 
There are. That's why I deleted it last time, but won't now.
Oh so it does the bare minimum and references all of 6 things, gotcha
It's from scaling to Alastor, who is already established as Low 7-C (the tier actually on the page).
How about that little calc Adam has that puts him at 30 Kilotons? That's the one I'm smoking chief
And those can revise it, once it's over.
So basically the effort is meaningless anyway cause it won't be used as theres a full profile prepared and only being debated on, good to know
 
How about that little calc Adam has that puts him at 30 Kilotons? That's the one I'm smoking chief
Missing a new calc isn't grounds for deletion, it's grounds for a CRT to be made.
So basically the effort is meaningless anyway cause it won't be used as theres a full profile prepared and only being debated on, good to know
Yeah.

I told the page's creator that a version of it was being discussed, they said "no there isn't" and reposted the page. If they wanna stick their head in the sand about it and waste time & effort, that's their problem.
 
Missing a new calc isn't grounds for deletion, it's grounds for a CRT to be made.
Alright then
Yeah.

I told the page's creator that a version of it was being discussed, they said "no there isn't" and reposted the page. If they wanna stick their head in the sand about it and waste time & effort, that's their problem.
Excellent, pain and misery for when they look at their Adam profile and realize it looks nothing like what they made
 
Bronya Zaychik

Almost zero scans and references in the P&A. The justifications are lacking and inconsistent, for example, some justifications in the Key of Truth have some explanation while others just have "With Xth Divine Key, name" and it's not even explained why she has these things or why the Divine Key has those haxes.

Part of the AP justification is misleading, the "and using Star of Eden with Yamabuki Armor, she could notably damage the Herrscher of the Void" is false, the feat happens here, and you can see that is not what happened.

Inconsistency in resistance, all Herrschers have resistance to Physics manipulation, but for some reason Bronya is the only one who doesn't have it.

No scans and references for her range, no justification on the High Complex Multiversal range, the justifications also doesn't explain the reason she has it, it just say she has it via X

The NA/T has some info on it, there are some scans, but again, no references, two the scans are in poor quality and it seems like someone used the automatic translation of the Youtube to generate a caption. There is also explained why she has the divine keys, but again there are no scans.

Categories are lacking.

Raiden Mei

More or less the same problems, lack of scans and references.

Her range section, only the first part is bolded, same problems in the justification where it says that she has this via X without explaining why.

Natasha

Doesn't have any source, no justification on the intelligence, LS, stamina, and range section.


The profiles below are a little better, but there are still some problems, the key of the authority of Kevin's profile has problems with justifications, while some things have a certain explanation (no scans, no references) others are just "with the Authority of Ice" his profile says that he has all the authorities, but we've seen before in this post that, for example, the Reason authority has High Complex Multiversal range, but we don't see that in his range. Some justifications are lacking as well. He is also lacking a Sim key.

Kiana's profiles says that she resisted one of the supposed scalings that Bronya has, with no mention of Star of Eden in the justifications, and it doesn't even explain why the Oath of Judah has powernull. There's the physics manipulation resistance scan, but you only see this scan there and not in the other profiles despite them using the same justification. The Finality key has more or less the same problems as the Kevin's one, and so does the range.

Kalpas's profile is better, there are more scans even though there are no references and some are links on Imgur and not in the formatting. No scans for his AP, LS, dura, intelligence, the speed section only links to profile and to an outdated calc, no justification on his range. His sim key is very different from Elysia's, for example.

Captain's profile says in the fairytale key (that key also lacks some justifications, references, and scans) that the Oath of Judah has resistence negation, while in Kiana's profile it says it has powernull instead, it also doesn't say that she resists resistance negation in the justifications, talking about resistances it also says that "with Divine Keys, which operate using Herrscher powers that naturally bend and break the laws of physics by imposing their laws upon reality" and this is attributed as "Limited Law and Dimensional manipulation" no other profile has this, I also have no idea how you have dimensional manipulation by breaking the laws of physics. In the Hyperion key, there is a mention of 11 dimensional space, no scans, no references, and it doesn't explain whether these dimensions qualify under the site's standards. General lack of scans, and the same problem in the range that all profiles have. The NA/T seems okay, could have more sources though.

Otto's profile is one of the best, A good part of the profile has scans and references, but even this one doesn't escape the problems that affect the whole verse. Some justifications still don't exist and have no source at all, just look at the amount of "with something" with no explanation or source as to why. Same range problems. NA/T unsourced.

Elysia's profile isn't too bad, I can only point to the lack of some scans, references, some links are broken, and the inconsistency in the justification of the Sim key with the other profiles.

Kevin
Kiana
Kalpas
Captain
Elysia
Otto

All profiles suffer more or less from these problems, I think most have good reasons for being deleted, while there are 2 profiles that are a bit better and probably need to be discussed.
 
Bronya Zaychik

Almost zero scans and references in the P&A. The justifications are lacking and inconsistent, for example, some justifications in the Key of Truth have some explanation while others just have "With Xth Divine Key, name" and it's not even explained why she has these things or why the Divine Key has those haxes.

Part of the AP justification is misleading, the "and using Star of Eden with Yamabuki Armor, she could notably damage the Herrscher of the Void" is false, the feat happens here, and you can see that is not what happened.

Inconsistency in resistance, all Herrschers have resistance to Physics manipulation, but for some reason Bronya is the only one who doesn't have it.

No scans and references for her range, no justification on the High Complex Multiversal range, the justifications also doesn't explain the reason she has it, it just say she has it via X

The NA/T has some info on it, there are some scans, but again, no references, two the scans are in poor quality and it seems like someone used the automatic translation of the Youtube to generate a caption. There is also explained why she has the divine keys, but again there are no scans.

Categories are lacking.

Raiden Mei

More or less the same problems, lack of scans and references.

Her range section, only the first part is bolded, same problems in the justification where it says that she has this via X without explaining why.

Natasha

Doesn't have any source, no justification on the intelligence, LS, stamina, and range section.


The profiles below are a little better, but there are still some problems, the key of the authority of Kevin's profile has problems with justifications, while some things have a certain explanation (no scans, no references) others are just "with the Authority of Ice" his profile says that he has all the authorities, but we've seen before in this post that, for example, the Reason authority has High Complex Multiversal range, but we don't see that in his range. Some justifications are lacking as well. He is also lacking a Sim key.

Kiana's profiles says that she resisted one of the supposed scalings that Bronya has, with no mention of Star of Eden in the justifications, and it doesn't even explain why the Oath of Judah has powernull. There's the physics manipulation resistance scan, but you only see this scan there and not in the other profiles despite them using the same justification. The Finality key has more or less the same problems as the Kevin's one, and so does the range.

Kalpas's profile is better, there are more scans even though there are no references and some are links on Imgur and not in the formatting. No scans for his AP, LS, dura, intelligence, the speed section only links to profile and to an outdated calc, no justification on his range. His sim key is very different from Elysia's, for example.

Captain's profile says in the fairytale key (that key also lacks some justifications, references, and scans) that the Oath of Judah has resistence negation, while in Kiana's profile it says it has powernull instead, it also doesn't say that she resists resistance negation in the justifications, talking about resistances it also says that "with Divine Keys, which operate using Herrscher powers that naturally bend and break the laws of physics by imposing their laws upon reality" and this is attributed as "Limited Law and Dimensional manipulation" no other profile has this, I also have no idea how you have dimensional manipulation by breaking the laws of physics. In the Hyperion key, there is a mention of 11 dimensional space, no scans, no references, and it doesn't explain whether these dimensions qualify under the site's standards. General lack of scans, and the same problem in the range that all profiles have. The NA/T seems okay, could have more sources though.

Otto's profile is one of the best, A good part of the profile has scans and references, but even this one doesn't escape the problems that affect the whole verse. Some justifications still don't exist and have no source at all, just look at the amount of "with something" with no explanation or source as to why. Same range problems. NA/T unsourced.

Elysia's profile isn't too bad, I can only point to the lack of some scans, references, some links are broken, and the inconsistency in the justification of the Sim key with the other profiles.

Kevin
Kiana
Kalpas
Captain
Elysia
Otto

All profiles suffer more or less from these problems, I think most have good reasons for being deleted, while there are 2 profiles that are a bit better and probably need to be discussed.
Do you want me to just nuke the entire verse at this point?
 
If you mean it, I am not opposed to it, but the calculations can stay, the Honkai Energy page I am not sure, it's by far the most sourced part of the verse, so it probably can stay.
Verse-specific powers and abilities can only be maintained if at least 5 characters retains it. If all those profiles are gonna get nuked, then that page isn’t an exception.
 
Man this verse isn't ever getting rest;
But it's fine by me I guess, only if Shiroiyo is willing to actually work on the verse though
 
Man this verse isn't ever getting rest;
But it's fine by me I guess, only if Shiroiyo is willing to actually work on the verse though
We don't delete verses that people are willing to work on. If they want to work on it, they'll stay up, so CRTs can be made to revise them.
 
I'd like other people's opinion on whether Mason Hargreaves should stay up.

It's the only character from the series, is 10-A physically, 9-C with weapons, and has no superhuman abilities (and really, a few of them feel like stretches).

Although, the Wikipedia page for the source material describes it as an action movie, so I'm unsure whether that suffices for our standards or not.
 
I'd like other people's opinion on whether Mason Hargreaves should stay up.

It's the only character from the series, is 10-A physically, 9-C with weapons, and has no superhuman abilities (and really, a few of them feel like stretches).

Although, the Wikipedia page for the source material describes it as an action movie, so I'm unsure whether that suffices for our standards or not.
He has several P&A, why is he even up for discussion
He's fine lol
 
He has several P&A, why is he even up for discussion
He's fine lol
  1. Peak Human Physical Characteristics: Achievable by a human.
  2. Expert Marksman: Achievable by a human.
  3. Martial Arts: Achievable by a human.
  4. Social Influencing: Wank, it's literally just him having a network of informants.
  5. Stealth Mastery: Wank, breaking into a home doesn't guarantee any amount of stealth. And to the extent that it does, it's achievable by humans. Ask the hundreds of thousands of people who do that every year.
  6. Supernatural Willpower: Wank.
I think this is up for discussion because of one of our Editing Rules
Low-powered characters are allowed to be featured here as long as the characters come from popular/notable verses that are overall worthy of indexing, they are important to their stories, and the profiles are reliable and well-made, although sitcom characters, ones from more realistic romantic comedies, and similar should be avoided. This wiki's main purpose is to index characters, not to feature fights between them.
"worthy of indexing" has typically been taken to mean "has superhuman feats" or "focuses on fighting". That's why it says to avoid realistic characters from sitcoms and romcoms.

It clearly fails the superhuman part, but idk if it fails the fighting-focus part, hence why I want more opinions.
 
Last edited:
  1. Peak Human Physical Characteristics: Achievable by a human.
  2. Expert Marksman: Achievable by a human.
  3. Martial Arts: Achievable by a human.
  4. Social Influencing: Wank, it's literally just him having a network of informants.
  5. Stealth Mastery: Wank, breaking into a home doesn't guarantee any amount of stealth. And to the extent that it does, it's achievable by humans. Ask the hundreds of thousands of people who do that every year.
  6. Supernatural Willpower: Wank.
I think this is up for discussion because of one of our Editing Rules

"worthy of indexing" has typically been taken to mean "has superhuman feats" or "focuses on fighting". That's why it says to avoid realistic characters from sitcoms and romcoms.

It clearly fails the superhuman part, but idk if it fails the fighting-focus part, hence why I want more opinions.
To my personally, I really don't see an actual problem with this although some of the abilities does look pretty fishy. And it literally specifically states "realistic romantic comedies" but the other one is rather worded pretty vaguely, so I'm not quite sure how to make out of that one. And even then, we do allow a lot of 10-As with abilities like that one on there. Deleting it will not be necessary
 
"worthy of indexing" has typically been taken to mean "has superhuman feats" or "focuses on fighting". That's why it says to avoid realistic characters from sitcoms and romcoms.
I fail to see how the rules mean "has superhuman feats" rather than "Has relevant combat feats"
By this metric, the mainline Saw films should be axed since the stuff in it is achievable by humans, and I'd hardly say it focuses on fighting (Unless you take escaping traps for that?)

Either way if the page is from an action movie idk why it's not the second for sure
 
And even then, we do allow a lot of 10-As with abilities like that one on there. Deleting it will not be necessary
As our rule states, it's not so much about the individual profile, but about the verse overall, and whether it's worthy of indexing.

TDN Trilogy hits 9-A with Subsonic reactions.

Robocop hits 9-B with Supersonic reactions.

Gladiator's the only close call out of those, its highest being 9-C for fighting off a tiger, and Superhuman with no justification. But I haven't seen the media, so maybe it still qualifies by virtue of being combat focused.
I fail to see how the rules mean "has superhuman feats" rather than "Has relevant combat feats"
...If I brought out precedent, reiterated and going back over 5 years, establishing that, would that satisfy you? Since I really don't wanna bother with that unless I have to.
By this metric, the mainline Saw films should be axed since the stuff in it is achievable by humans, and I'd hardly say it focuses on fighting (Unless you take escaping traps for that?)
Saw has blatantly 9-B characters within the games, that might lend credibility to the films being included.
Either way if the page is from an action movie idk why it's not the second for sure
I haven't seen it, so I don't know exactly where it falls on that sorta line. Hence the asking.
 
As our rule states, it's not so much about the individual profile, but about the verse overall, and whether it's worthy of indexing.

TDN Trilogy hits 9-A with Subsonic reactions.

Robocop hits 9-B with Supersonic reactions.
Except, these characters that I've mentioned in the links aren't actually scaling at all to those who are actually Superhuman within the verse, what I'm saying is it's just setting up a double standard.
 
Except, these characters that I've mentioned in the links aren't actually scaling at all to those who are actually Superhuman within the verse, what I'm saying is it's just setting up a double standard.
I know.

I mean that, the rules care about whether anyone in the series has such feats. Not whether any particular profile scales to them.

We would have profiles for Cool Cat if there was a 9-A feat, we don't since the MC's only combat-relevant stuff is having a gun for a bit.
 
Apologies about these only going back 4 years, I think some of the earlier ones got caught in the move, or were otherwise discussed in a way that makes searching them difficult.

Here's some examples from 2020:
I felt the rule must've always been that the character must belong to a combat-centric verse or have notable enough abilities to be listed i.e. Non-mudane P&A or 9-C or higher statistic and I will 110% stand by the notion that if any characters don't fit either, they can be removed.
I think 10-Bs and 10-As can stay as long as they have something to bring t the table, like some martial arts or athletics, but that's probably not totally relevant here.
In October 2020, we saw the codification of our current rule with this post from AKM:
Well, I am afraid not everything can be objectively laid out. Some things will always be subjective and we will have to look at them on a case-by-case basis. Both Jabami and Bulma's dad only have a single power "Genius Intelligence", but one is okay and the other is not. Both Arthur Fleck and Farmer with Shotgun are humans with guns. But one is okay and the other is not. But yes, this can be discussed in detail in a staff thread if people are willing to make one.
Ant's wording is literally the current rule we have, with stuff added in the parenthesis which I think will make Jabami invalid because it's not a fighting verse and neither supernatural.
The intent was to rely on context from the rest of the verse. Sometimes, humans with one sorta pedestrian ability or a gun are allowed, because they're from a fighting verse. When the verses aren't like that, they're not allowed.

Here's some more of that, from late 2020 and early 2021
Wouldn't that be covered under "some form of fighting"? Or should we reword the rule in the following manner?

"Low-powered characters are allowed to be featured here as long as the characters come from popular/notable verses that are overall worthy of indexing (meaning ones that are either at least partially action-oriented and/or focus on the supernatural), they are important to their stories, and the profiles are reliable and well-made, although sitcom characters, ones from more realistic romantic comedies, and similar should be avoided. This wiki's main purpose is to index characters, not to feature fights between them."
Basically verses where superpowers or combat abilities whatsoever literally don't exist is the part that's not allowed; which happens to be some of the more romantic sitcoms. The Sitcoms that basically behave like live action cartoons such as the various shows on Nickelodeon or Disney Channel are fine though.
I'm not sure how it got worded as sitcoms specifically, but verses where fighting abilities, super powers, ect are literally not existent should not be on the wiki. I believe it had "Sitcoms" placed more so because that was the biggest example given the bad profiles for "How I Met Your Mother" or "Two and a Half Men." But the rule may need to be worded better.

I'll note gambling verses still count as combat based on what Prom mentioned.

Here's a time I was talking about the same rules with you, in this thread, back in April 2021, where Ant/Armor sided with me:
When you failed in deleting it you probably should have paid more attention to the reasons given. The verse as a whole has notable characters with notable abilities, like Maxine Caulfield. Since Life is Strange is a notable verse worthy of indexing, and Chloe is a very important character in it, and the page itself is well-made, it's allowed to be kept.

This does not mean that we can make profiles for every single normal human within fiction.
Here in mid-2021, a sitcom character was saved due to having 9-C stats.
I think that rule only bans sitcom characters that are from realistic romantic comedies and sitcom characters that are like 10-B with no notable abilities

If a sitcom character has, say 9-C stats and anything above that. I think they should be allowed
And then, in early 2022
Human level characters are allowed on the wiki if they have something notable about them that makes them worth indexing
A human level profile was saved specifically due to having notable abilities.

Going a bit newer, here's an example from late 2023
I can think of a couple of rules this may fall under:

  • Preferably avoid adding character profiles that may be inappropriate or perceived to be in poor taste. This may include characters, weapons, etcetera, that are ill-suited for a statistics-indexing wiki, due to having no reliable feats, or ones from media which may be too controversial or otherwise unnecessary to be featured. This includes pages that would strictly be written as a joke, and as such more suitably belong in the Joke Battles wiki. Although we do feature some franchises with mature content, those that are primarily focused on, or are only composed of, excessive levels of sexual content will not be featured here, and the pages have to be kept clean, without erotic images. For further information, please read our Acceptable Content Rating Scale and Fandom's community guidelines.
  • Low-powered characters are allowed to be featured here as long as the characters come from popular/notable verses that are overall worthy of indexing, they are important to their stories, and the profiles are reliable and well-made, although sitcom characters, ones from more realistic romantic comedies, and similar should be avoided. This wiki's main purpose is to index characters, not to feature fights between them.
Where a "10-A physically, 9-C with weapons, at least 9-B with bombs" profile with weapon mastery, genius intelligence, preparation, and explosion manip, was deleted not just for being a representation of a terrorist from a biopic, but for failing those standards on combat notability.
 
I know.

I mean that, the rules care about whether anyone in the series has such feats. Not whether any particular profile scales to them.
Even then, I saw characters from certain verses that has a whole series of feats still get deleted for not being as "supernatural" or rather being very realistic, I really don't see how this matters at all and again, it's a double standard and it sets up a bad precedent.
 
Even then, I saw characters from certain verses that has a whole series of feats still get deleted for not being as "supernatural" or rather being very realistic, I really don't see how this matters at all and again, it's a double standard and it sets up a bad precedent.
If you wanna change those standards you can give it a shot, it's just outside the scope of this thread.
 
 
Reasons:
  • Are minor 10-B characters in the verse that shows up for less than half-a-chapter and are incapacitated/killed by each other off-screen.
  • Aren't important to the verse scaling chain nor does they offer anything to it as they simply hadn't fought anybody in an actual fight before they was incapacitated/killed by each other off-screen
  • Both of them have no scans or references for their ability justification (but this isn't too much of an issue since this profile was made around the early 2010s, iirc)
  • Ransuu as only "two abilities" - of which one can be argued to be social manip instead of emp manip as it is listed and illusions through drugs. Útgarða-Loki just uses illusions via magic.
Reasons:
  • Are just a "mob" type enemy that only showed up in the epilogue of one story and has never made another appearance or has never been mentioned since.
  • They don't scale to anything. As they were only ever fought by people who one-shotted them nor have they actually harmed anybody on-screen. Any character that is mentioned that they scale above to are guesswork at best.
  • Has no scans or references for their justification (but this isn't too much of an issue since this profile was made around the early 2010s, iirc)
... Okay, this is getting a bit too long, so... um... I just mass link the other characters in the ToAru verse that shares the same issues I see that Ransuu, Útgarða-Loki and Artificial Valkyrie have that I see as grounds for deletion. I.E, only showed up once/limited amount of times, doesn't offer or isn't (or can't be) apart of the verse's scaling due to their extremely limited screen time, and the justifications are lacking scans or references or aren't that altogether


There are also these early 2010s Group/Organization-like pages:
For Anti-Skill, we only have one member of this organization with a profile, Yomikawa is also the only person who has showcased any feats as the rest are fodder that are killed relatively quickly. Same for Hound with Kihara Amata. Amasuka has two members with Tatemiya Saiji and Itsuwa, but again, they suffer from the same issues of being the only ones who are relatively important and have feats while the rest are named fodder. Knights of England has a member through Knight Leader but he vastly outscales them in every category and has never fought alongside them on-screen.

Edit: Did a bit of a minor edit here as I realized I did a massive brain-fart in spelling, lel

I figure these pages should just be deleted, imo.



There are also these guys.
They are High 1-C to 5-B peps.

They have also have never said a word on-screen, have never actually fully appeared on-screen, all of their "unique abilities" were just talked about by other character, we don't know how they actually fight and all-and I do mean all- of their abilities and scaling comes from narration and them just scaling to Othinus, High Priest, Niang-Niang and Nephthys. Also, Zombie just died off-screen and didn't do anything of merit other than provide a spell.

I figure these pages should just be deleted as well, imo.
 
Last edited:
Reasons:
  • Are minor 10-B characters in the verse that shows up for less than half-a-chapter and are incapacitated/killed by each other off-screen.
  • Aren't important to the verse scaling chain nor does they offer anything to it as they simply hadn't fought anybody in an actual fight before they was incapacitated/killed by each other off-screen
  • Both of them have no scans or references for their ability justification (but this isn't too much of an issue since this profile was made around the early 2010s, iirc)
  • Ransuu as only "two abilities" - of which one can be argued to be social manip instead of emp manip as it is listed and illusions through drugs. Útgarða-Loki just uses illusions via magic.
Reasons:
  • Are just a "mob" type enemy that only showed up in the epilogue of one story and has never made another appearance or has never been mentioned since.
  • They don't scale to anything. As they were only ever fought by people who one-shotted them nor have they actually harmed anybody on-screen. Any character that is mentioned that they scale above to are guesswork at best.
  • Has no scans or references for their justification (but this isn't too much of an issue since this profile was made around the early 2010s, iirc)
... Okay, this is getting a bit too long, so... um... I just mass link the other characters in the ToAru verse that shares the same issues I see that Ransuu, Útgarða-Loki and Artificial Valkyrie have that I see as grounds for deletion. I.E, only showed up once/limited amount of times, doesn't offer or isn't (or can't be) apart of the verse's scaling due to their extremely limited screen time, and the justifications are lacking scans or references or aren't that altogether


There are also these early 2010s Group/Organization-like pages:
For Anti-Skill, we only have one member of this organization with a profile, Yomikawa is also the only person who has showcased any feats as the rest are fodder that are killed relatively quickly. Same for Hound with Kihara Amata. Amasuka has two members with Tatemiya Saiji and Itsuwa, but again, they suffer from the same issues of being the only ones who are relatively important and have feats while the rest are named fodder. Knights of England has a member through Knight Leader but he vastly outscales them in every category and has never fought alongside them on-screen.

Edit: Did a bit of a minor edit here as I realized I did a massive brain-fart in spelling, lel

I figure these pages should just be deleted, imo.



There are also these guys.
They are High 1-C to 5-B peps.

They have also have never said a word on-screen, have never actually fully appeared on-screen, all of their "unique abilities" were just talked about by other character, we don't know how they actually fight and all-and I do mean all- of their abilities and scaling comes from narration and them just scaling to Othinus, High Priest, Niang-Niang and Nephthys. Also, Zombie just died off-screen and didn't do anything of merit other than provide a spell.

I figure these pages should just be deleted as well, imo.
Disagree with all of these. Of course the pages should get scans or references at some point, but that is no deletion reason.

All of them either have enough feats to have actual stats or are normal humans with unique powers. Heck some like Yamisaka has like 10 known spells and an actual fight. And the powers are properly explained.

The only ones I would consider are Anti-Skill and maybe Hound Dog, as they are mostly just soldiers with good equipment.

We also have seen brief bits of the MGs fighting in their nerfed states. Not that it matters. A character needs no full fight if we know what they can do.

Basically, none of those (except maybe anti-skill and hound dog) meet any of our deletion criteria.
 
Disagree with all of these. Of course the pages should get scans or references at some point, but that is no deletion reason.

All of them either have enough feats to have actual stats or are normal humans with unique powers. Heck some like Yamisaka has like 10 known spells and an actual fight. And the powers are properly explained.

The only ones I would consider are Anti-Skill and maybe Hound Dog, as they are mostly just soldiers with good equipment.

We also have seen brief bits of the MGs fighting in their nerfed states. Not that it matters. A character needs no full fight if we know what they can do.

Basically, none of those (except maybe anti-skill and hound dog) meet any of our deletion criteria.
Yeah, agreed
 
Back
Top