• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Unverifiable GoW scans and ability removal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not responding anymore to Georr's stonewalling/repeated comments

@Planck69

Is there a miscommunication here, perhaps? I am not against the removal of those abilities if any other shreds of evidence exist and can be replaced. My point is, if they indeed "exist," why don't you formulate those aforementioned abilities to use those "feats/statements"?

And I am still saying this with full respect; I am not intending any accusations.
Aite then. Gimme a minute.
 
If this WoG isn't valid then it shouldn't be used as support in first place and for cases of complete removal from what I saw (if theres a problem with my interpretation then point it out like Planck) relied mostly on that DM. Can you tackle that before calling my post disingenuous?
The burden of proof is on you to show they were doctored or made with ill intentions, not me.

Either way, you seem to forget that WoG is only used as clarification for what already exists. We would not have been able to use any of it without the game showing it in the flesh or talking about it.
 
The burden of proof is on you to show they were doctored or made with ill intentions, not me.
Whoa, what? Why would someone else need to prove private messages are fake? Are you taking the stance that our default approach should be to assume that unverifiable private messages with authors are real unless someone can prove them fake?
 
The burden of proof is on you to show they were doctored or made with ill intentions, not me.
Interesting. So I can now fake any DMs, and unless someone else can show me a proof that I fake it, I can use it.
 
He said this because the DM fully supported by the game... But if the community is of the opinion that it should be removed, mehhh I can't say anything.
 
He said this because the DM fully supported by the game... But if the community is of the opinion that it should be removed, mehhh I can't say anything.
And because many other GoW supporters with more in-depth knowledge than me (Who actively look for legitimate DMs and tweets that can actually be used and verify them on a daily basis) told me as such. I saw no reason to distrust their word and I personally don't think them to be doctored either based on that. But if y'all wanna remove it, I won't protest, but to pretend none of these abilities fit without WoG is just straight up wrong. If the game didn't have it we wouldn't think twice about never using WoG.
 
Who actively look for legitimate DMs and tweets that can actually be used and verify them on a daily basis) told me as such. I saw no reason to distrust their word and I personally don't think them to be doctored either based on that.
If they can explain how these DMs were verified that would be helpful
 
If they can explain how these DMs were verified that would be helpful
Unfortunately most of them have since left. I never got the chance to ask them, as the screenshots taken were from before my time on the wiki.
 

  • Resurrection (As long as Hope exists, Kratos will continue to keep coming back to life, as after Fear Zeus killed him by snapping his neck, Kratos was forced back into his mind, where he then finally unlocked the Power of Hope and came back to life[24])


 
Okay but why is no selling an attack extrapolated to Invulnerability ?

Remove conceptual manipulation resistance. There's no manipulation of concepts here and being able to interact with a concept in non physical interaction

Resistance Negation nah. Overcoming someone's resistance to something is just layers. Very different from having a mechanism that sidesteps resistance entirely. EG. Red Key from Umineko which ignores the very concept of resistance
 
Okay but why is no selling an attack extrapolated to immunuty?

Remove conceptual manipulation resistance. There's no manipulation of concepts here and being able to interact with a concept in non physical interaction
The link was supposed to be changed to Enhanced Resistance, guess I forgot.

As for no manipulation of concepts, laughable as that is, we see Zeus do it just fine when he seals the Evils and when he attempts to subsume Kratos with Fear itself.
 
Okay but why is no selling an attack extrapolated to Invulnerability ?

Remove conceptual manipulation resistance. There's no manipulation of concepts here and being able to interact with a concept in non physical interaction

Resistance Negation nah. Overcoming someone's resistance to something is just layers. Very different from having a mechanism that sidesteps resistance entirely. EG. Red Key from Umineko which ignores the very concept of resistance
We can have those discussions in a separate CRT. Not this one.
 
The link was supposed to be changed to Enhanced Resistance, guess I forgot.

As for no manipulation of concepts, laughable as that is, we see Zeus do it just fine when he seals the Evils and when he attempts to subsume Kratos with Fear itself.
It's not necessary? Because, against this, Hope was stated and also shown to be unaffected, uninteractive and untouchable...

No need to remove
 
It's not necessary? Because, against this, Hope was stated and also shown to be unaffected, uninteractive and untouchable...

No need to remove
Regardless, this is a scan verification and replacement issue. Not the place to deal with this.
 
Ignore Georr for a second. I think if you want to deal with someone who sends shreds of evidence with links, do it with those two staff members in a separate thread.

Regarding your modifications, @Planck69, they overall look good. I won't judge if they meet the criteria at the moment, as it would be derailing the current premise of the thread. However, I trust you as a person that these should be legitimate replacements, or at least, that was the original intention, when it was first introduced.
 
Last edited:
Everyone here, the thread's reached a conclusion. You're welcome to verify the scans or whatever (they come from the God of War I and II Novelizations and the end of the third game) but aside from that, no more bickering.
 
Remove conceptual manipulation resistance. There's no manipulation of concepts here and being able to interact with a concept in non physical interaction
This is just straight up laughable. We see Zeus literally interact with the Great Evils, summon them, manipulate them and seal them inside Pandora's box, and then again when he uses Fear against Kratos in the end of GoW3.

Again, this is an issue of scans, not the justifications. Not that your reasoning for this particular bit holds any water anyway given what's shown with Zeus.
 
@Dereck03 Can you open Kratos and Zeus' profiles?
:quieto~1:
 
I'll check for the appropriate references and add them accordingly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top