well the infinite mass part is actually plausible, blast focused all the force of it into a beam that blitzed him and his crew, and shot through the universe with no sign of stopping
the antimatter and time travel thing is the same point, both of which used a specific technique of manipulation said atoms, so it still could have produced them without actually having done it
So we’re cherry-picking? You either obey the theory of relativity or you do not, that’s how real life works. If we’re applying a real life theory to this fictional verse, than the verse needs to display all qualities of the theory when feats that would suggest their existence are performed. The punch should have immediately displayed every single function that would occur from moving even NEAR the speed of light, let alone far far faster than it.
Not to mention Blast would also have to display every single quality of surpassing the speed of light as well for catching that attack, and he himself would be an antimatter creating, black hole gravity sink hole of infinite mass that is traveling through time, and would rip the fabric of the universe apart by existing for the infinitesimal time he exists.
That's the point of possibly ratings.
“Possibly” ratings are for things that are incredibly plausible that simply don’t have enough evidence to definitively say are true.
That does not apply here, where the idea that Saitama obeys the theory of relativity is so wildly and impossibly false that putting a possibly is honestly insulting and requires 100x the assumptions needed than just believing his verse doesn’t follow the irl version of the theory of relativity.
technically not opposition, I'm still neutral
it's just that FRA trains blatantly do not require you to actually know what's going on. You can be a schizo 2nd grader with internet access (hypothetical) and say FRA to literally anything. It's just a method of inflating results without actually contributing to the argument, or proving you're even able to discuss it if people try to debate with your decision.
Welcome to the wiki where you can get FRA trained while having a winning argument because the fanboys found your vs thread, that’s how it is, don’t draw attention to it.
I literally never use FRA anymore, I say my own arguments with my own words and mind, and take Ls when a L presents itself through good logic. I do not vote on things I know nothing about "FRA" and then unfollow thread like some people do
good for you, others are still gonna do it, no point getting upset over it.
Enough derailing.
High 3-A Saitama via the theory of relativity is wrong and ridiculous and quite frankly insane to insinuate for the reasons outlined by myself and others. The fact that the argument against the opposing stance is literally “we don’t know, it could have happened, the attack was pretty big,” and “well that other verse doesn’t do them all so we shouldn’t have to either” is very telling.
