• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I personally would not mind if they are removed.
 
I would like to request the deletion of Downfall of Castle and Country, Razor Edge, and Spuit Lance. They are weapon profiles that don't really add anything. Their number of abilities are pretty small, and there is no reason for them to be their own profiles. The latter two especially, as they are weapons held by characters with their own profiles, and are already adequately explained in their P&A sections due to their previously mentioned small number of abilities.
Done
 
This other use is creating unfinished pages, as well.
Again the same user


And again this user is contributing as well, both have been warned multiple times and ignored, I think ban is in order.
 
Last edited:
Again the same user


And again this user is contributing as well, both have been warned multiple times and ignored, I think ban is in order.
I've deleted the page and this does warrant serious consequences.
 
I've deleted the page and this does warrant serious consequences.

There we have another one
 

There we have another one
I've deleted that page and I've also deleted this page again. I'm getting pretty certain about a ban being appropriate here.
 
Various pages have 9-A for what seems to be just defeating a large creature, all pages don't really have a good P&A section as far as I can see and so on
@Dargoo_Faust and @ApiesDeathbyLazors could try revising it however
 
Again the same user
They seem to have stopped after our latest warning to them.

And again this user is contributing as well, both have been warned multiple times and ignored, I think ban is in order.
I banned them earlier.
 
Various pages have 9-A for what seems to be just defeating a large creature, all pages don't really have a good P&A section as far as I can see and so on
@Dargoo_Faust and @ApiesDeathbyLazors could try revising it however
Is somebody willing to link to the calculation above in the relevant character profile pages that scale from it, so the reasoning becomes more apparent?
 
Thank you for helping out. Is it already linked to in our page for the character that performed the feat, with other pages that scale from that character linked in turn?
 
So do you mean that the Appletun page should be renamed to Applin with an automatic corresponding redirect link, and that a redirect link to Applin should also be added from a Flapple page? Your wording was a bit confusing in that regard.
 
So do you mean that the Appletun page should be renamed to Applin with an automatic corresponding redirect link, and that a redirect link to Applin should also be added from a Flapple page? Your wording was a bit confusing in that regard.
Flapple is now deleted as i merged it with appletun's page and added the pre-evolution of both Appletun and Flapple to the page. The page needs to be renamed to Applin - the name of the pre-evolution.
Applin page needs a redirect so that if someone searches for Appletun they get recommended Applin
 
Okay. I will try to properly apply what you requested then.
 
I have renamed the page in question and created two redirect links to it.

 
Thank you for helping out. Is it already linked to in our page for the character that performed the feat, with other pages that scale from that character linked in turn?
Former yes, latter mention them but don't link. I don't know the verse though and a lot of links would need to be rearranged so I think it's fine this way.
 
Okay. Thank you for the reply. Would somebody here be willing to add appropriate scaling links to our other profile pages for the relevant verse please?
 
All pages are low quality, have no scans and the 9-B is from a LS feat that doesn't even seem to scale to physicals, guy who made this is inactive

No reasoning for 9-C or any scans

No solid reasoning for the stats

Stats are not backed up, no scans for powers and so on
 
Well, 9-C and 9-B do not necessarily need calculations if the feats are self-evident. I would appreciate if other staff members can investigate the rest of the suggestions though.
 
Considering how empty these files are, especially Spy Kids - which has formatting issues too, I am not opposed to their deletion
 
Back
Top