• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Page Deletion Requests Thread (New forum)

First one, I agree with its deletion. Nothing noteworthy and the creator hasn't been active for a year and half.

For the second one... Idk, wait what no more talking says. Doesn't seem too bad - except for scans missing
 
One of our Editing Rules explicitly bans profiles for characters from music videos
"Do not create any joke profiles, as they do not fit into our tiering system. Also avoid creating profiles for fan characters, advertisement characters, memes, YouTube personalities, reality television, talk shows, music videos, stage personas, and the like. If you wish to create such profiles, feel free to do so in the Joke Battles wiki instead. Take note that there is obviously a difference between a profile written as a joke, and the character itself being automatically funny."
Click to expand...
Yet some of our Music Characters flaunt this rule, such as Cool-T, Crazy Frog, The Yellow Submarine (Verse), and Ilona Mitrecey.

From checking the logs, the Crazy Frog page was deleted before, and I seem to distinctly remember The Yellow Submarine pages getting deleted for for exactly that reason.

What should be done about this?
 
Antvasima said:
Also, just as a note to @Tllmbrg :

You should only bring up verses and profile pages that are legitimately not remotely fulfilling our requirements/standards, not simply go on a deletion-spree because you find it funny for our wiki to go back and forth between the 30,000 pages limit several times.

Also, you need to always make a genuine effort with applying proper cleanup work for every single page that you have deleted or will delete, by removing all of the regular wiki links to them. Thank you.
Click to expand...
@Tllmbrg

I need to be able to trust that you are taking your responsibilities here seriously.
 
Bobsican said:
Spin (Jojo's Bizarre Adventure)
Only has 4 users, and that's if we're generous with what the page says, as currently only one profile (besides the verse page) links to it, so it wouldn't be particularly difficult to remove currently.
Click to expand...
This is still yet to be addressed

Also...

Nightmare (Hardcore Leveling Warrior)

Only has 4 users, and I've talked about the page with @Sir_Ovens , and it appears he has no plans to index more characters with the power (Even if there's apparently plenty) anytime soon.
 
This is a gross overcorrection of a rather minor problem. Both Spin and Nightmare have far more users than currently listed. On principle alone that should be enough to warrant their stay on the site. Both are researched, accurate, and up to date. There is no reason to annex both of them by virtue of a minor technicality.
 
Antvasima said:
@Tllmbrg

I need to be able to trust that you are taking your responsibilities here seriously.
Click to expand...
If it's about the page that Armorchompy mentioned, while Tllmbrg did bring it up as a candidate for deletion, Crazylatin's the one who deleted it despite Armorchompy's plea for it to stay.
 
Sure, there may be plenty of users than what's currently on the site, but that's exactly the problem, however, whether we count based on the ones actually indexed or what there's technically in a verse but simply not fully indexed is a gray area, and I'd vote for going with what's actually indexed as otherwise that'd lead into bloating the amount of verse-specific power pages that are hardly used to begin with, as their whole purpose is to simplify indexing in a considerable amount of pages with them.

If the amount of users is no longer relevant out of stuff simply being accurate for our purposes, then the respective Editing Rule should be changed accordingly to make the stance on the matter clear.
 
Last edited:
Agnaa said:
If it's about the page that Armorchompy mentioned, while Tllmbrg did bring it up as a candidate for deletion, Crazylatin's the one who deleted it despite Armorchompy's plea for it to stay.
Click to expand...
I was referring to that Tllmbrg has repeatedly pushed the wiki back before the 30,000 pages limit in a rather overenthusiastic manner, and I discovered that he had not always properly cleaned up all of the relevant links to the deleted pages afterwards, so I wanted to make certain that he handles the deletion process responsibly.
 
Bobsican said:
Sure, there may be plenty of users than what's currently on the site, but that's exactly the problem, however, whether we count based on the ones actually indexed or what there's technically in a verse but simply not fully indexed is a gray area, and I'd vote for going with what's actually indexed as otherwise that'd lead into bloating the amount of verse-specific power pages that are hardly used to begin with, as their whole purpose is to simplify indexing in a considerable amount of pages with them.

If the amount of users is no longer relevant out of stuff simply being accurate for our purposes, then the respective Editing Rule should be changed accordingly to make the stance on the matter clear.
Click to expand...
I personally do not consider verse-specific powers pages as harmful, even if they have rather few users, as long as they are reliable and well-structured.
 
Armorchompy said:
Why the **** was it deleted?
Click to expand...

Agnaa said:
If it's about the page that Armorchompy mentioned, while Tllmbrg did bring it up as a candidate for deletion, Crazylatin's the one who deleted it despite Armorchompy's plea for it to stay.
Click to expand...
I restored the pages now. Sorry if I stressed anyone out, must've missed the og message
 
Crazylatin77 said:
I restored the pages now. Sorry if I stressed anyone out, must've missed the og message
Click to expand...
Thank you for helping out. Did you restore the removed links to them as well?
 
Judging by what links here, no page uses it for scaling and the page is very much not good so I think it can go.
 
I would like to request the deletion of the next pages:
vsbattles.fandom.com

Sylveon

Sylveon is one of the many evolutions of Eevee, originating from the sixth generation. It is an Fairy-type Pokémon that evolved from leveling up knowing a Fairy-type move and having at least two levels of Affection. Sylveon can use its ribbons to distract cautious prey before it attacks and...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com

Umbreon

Umbreon is one of the many evolutions of Eevee, having evolved through friendship at night. It is a pure Dark- type Pokémon originating from the second generation. Tier: High 7-A Name: Umbreon Origin: Pokémon Gender: Varies Age: Varies Classification: Moonlight Pokémon; Eeveelution Powers and...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com

Espeon

Espeon, the Sun Pokemon, is a pure Psychic type Pokemon, and one of the many "Eeveelutions" of the Pokemon series, being the fourth one in the Pokedex, coming right before its counterpart Umbreon. It is known to be incredibly loyal to its trainer as long as it finds them worth, and to have...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com

Leafeon

Leafeon is one of the many evolutions of Eevee, originating from the fourth generation. It is an Grass-type Pokémon that evolved from leveling up near an Moss Rock. This Pokémon's cellular structure is similar to plants, which allows it to perform photosynthesis and purify the air around it by...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com

Flareon

Flareon is a Fire-type Pokémon and one of Eevee's possible evolutions. It's known for its unique fur collar, which helps it regulate its own body temperature, as well as its ability to spew flames approaching temperatures of 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit from its flame sac. Tier: High 7-A Name...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com

Glaceon

Glaceon is one of the many evolutions of Eevee, originating from the fourth generation. It is an Ice-type Pokémon that evolved from leveling up near an Ice Rock. It is able to create small ice crystals around it by controlling its body temperature, freezing it's fur into sharp needle-like...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com

Jolteon

Jolteon (Japanese: サンダース Thunders) is an Electric-type Pokémon. It evolves from Eevee when exposed to a Thunder Stone. It is one of Eevee's final forms. The others are Vaporeon, Flareon, Espeon, Umbreon, Leafeon, Glaceon, and Sylveon. Tier: High 7-A Name: Jolteon, the Lightning Pokémon Origin...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com

Vaporeon

Vaporeon, the Bubble Jet Pokemon, is a Water-type Pokemon introduced in the first generation. It is an evolution of Eevee, evolving with exposure to a Water Stone, making it an Eeveelution, and it's the first one in the Pokedex. It has a cellular composition similar to that of water, and it can...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

All these profiles have been fused into the Eevee. Most matches on them are old and outdated too.
Considering they were fused into the eevee profile (and the currently existing pages were archived) i think it is ok to delete them now.
The thread where it was decided to fuse the pokemon profiles is here.
 
That Eevee page made me gag, what are those stat justifications... or lack thereof?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

DarkDragonMedeus
Standardization of Tabber Image Formatting
Replies
12
Views
1K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Jinx666
'Affiliations' addition (optional) to Character pages
Replies
20
Views
2K
Jinx666
Jinx666
Agnaa
Standard Format - Statistics Section Tabbers
Replies
19
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Just a Random Butler
  • Locked
Proposed Quality of Life Change to the Discussions Template
Replies
31
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Poiesis_Element
Mortal Shell Verse Creation
Replies
20
Views
2K
Poiesis_Element
Poiesis_Element
Back
Top