• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

This is a High 1-B Structure?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
258
Reaction score
28
In other wiki that deal with this issues and have the same patterns that this wiki about tiers, the people says that this is a High 1-B Structure:

The multiverse is comprised of infinite layers or "steps", each of which contains an infinite number of universes which are themselves infinitely larger than those found on the step below. It has been stated that an entire universe in one step can be contained within a single atom of a blade of grass in the step above, with this same step having an infinite multiverse which is itself contained within a grain of sand in the next step, and so on.

Thank you.
 
Wait... Really? But, a High 1-B structure must be dimensions where one transcend other, right?
 
What do you mean exactly?
one step has infinite universe, each universe contains infinite universes from the previous step so on. This is an uncountably infinite difference of power between steps and this is the same as a reailty fiction difference or the difference between a 3D to 4D or 4D to 5D. Then you have an infinite number of these steps and that's a high hyperversal heirarchy. I think.
 
Wait... Really? But, a High 1-B structure must be dimensions where one transcend other, right?
Dimensions aren't necessary for a qualitative difference to be reached. A single universe exists as an atom in a higher one, which means it has uncountably infinite instances of itself in that higher layer's timeline (much like how a regular timeline is Low 2-C via having a 3-dimensional universe for every infinitesimal moment in time), which would make that higher universe Low 1-C. This repeats itself over and over infinitely resulting in High 1-B.
 
Dimensions aren't necessary for a qualitative difference to be reached. A single universe exists as an atom in a higher one, which means it has uncountably infinite instances of itself in that higher layer's timeline (much like how a regular timeline is Low 2-C via having a 3-dimensional universe for every infinitesimal moment in time), which would make that higher universe Low 1-C. This repeats itself over and over infinitely resulting in High 1-B.
What tier would it be in if a character destroys one of those multiverses?
 
What tier would it be in if a character destroys one of those multiverses?
That's the tricky part, since it seems that this tower goes on infinitely from both ends. Wiki practice is to take the common reality as a reference point and see how many levels above that layer the multiverse in question is.
 
I understand. Then, any question related with that must be a "special" case. For example, if i said the following questions?
"A being that can destroy a or many space-continuum in one of those multiverses can be a Low 2-C or 2-C"
 
I understand. Then, any question related with that must be a "special" case. For example, if i said the following questions?
"A being that can destroy a or many space-continuum in one of those multiverses can be a Low 2-C or 2-C"
If it's the layer with the "base" of the setting then yes. If one layer higher, it's Low 1-C. if one layer lower then it's 11-A.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top