- 487
- 477
None of this is High 1-A. You just named a bunch of random thingsClearly you don't know about the Doom Patrol, phantom zone or the Source
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
None of this is High 1-A. You just named a bunch of random thingsClearly you don't know about the Doom Patrol, phantom zone or the Source
The best feats are in DC vertigo, if anything remained 1-A it would be them imoYou will be so angry when the DC cosmology fix finally happens I doubt there will be a 1A in canon DC anymore
only de-mattis cosmology would be solid 1A. Appparently it has infinite layers and god is above that.You will be so angry when the DC cosmology fix finally happens I doubt there will be a 1A in canon DC anymore
Can I see an infinite layers statement?only de-mattis cosmology would be solid 1A. Appparently it has infinite layers and god is above that.
Can I see the scan where this was stated?There is the void outside creation where no matter how big a creation gets the void is above but scaling it to others is tricky.
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:Elizio33/Sandbox4#The_Metaphysical_Realms_3Can I see an infinite layers statement?
Can I see the scan where this was stated?
The concept of death which exists in speed force is low 1-C here which flash could absorb in his body and this wiki hasn't yet done the revision and speed force scales to source wall.May I ask why?
I believe Scott and grant Morrison cosmology would qualify due to source wall and overvoidThe best feats are in DC vertigo, if anything remained 1-A it would be them imo
Yeah the void is easily 1-A just doubts of it being High-1A though ultima said its possible but meh.
The first link you sent outright states that they aren't physical universes or planes, more so a state of mind. They aren't literal physical universes
This link isn't working.
That's why the cosmology is getting split via writers. And Williamson would probably change it again now his brought the great Darkness and empty hand.The first link you sent outright states that they aren't physical universes or planes, more so a state of mind. They aren't literal physical universes
This scan is more so metaphorical for discovering true self and is philosophical. There's no evidence it's referring to an actual realty>fiction hierarchy that's seemingly ignored entirely within the rest of DC. I once again want to reiterate, heavens were directly stated to be states of mind.
This link isn't working.
Low 1-C how?The concept of death which exists in speed force is low 1-C here which flash could absorb in his body and this wiki hasn't yet done the revision and speed force scales to source wall.
Possibly, but most cosmic characters due not scale to the true extent of either. Perpetua is significantly weaker than the presence and was only considerably powerful when amped by him.I believe Scott and grant Morrison cosmology would qualify due to source wall and overvoid
Speed force is accepted as low 1-C construct here outside people take it up to 1-A even death battle during their cast.Low 1-C how?
No one scales to the void maybe only the presence and the source in grant Morrison cosmology and that's all while Scott snyder should be the same possibly plus he didn't give much info except when he brought the chronicler.Possibly, but most cosmic characters due not scale to the true extent of either. Perpetua is significantly weaker than the presence
Different writers all use the same cosmology. Don't mistake different writers as different canonsSpeed force is accepted as low 1-C construct here outside people take it up to 1-A even death battle during their cast.
No one scales to the void maybe only the presence and the source in grant Morrison cosmology and that's all while Scott snyder should be the same possibly plus he didn't give much info except when he brought the chronicler.
Will this help everyone?yogiri attack would kill as it's beyond causality
Yeah I know but wiki wants to separate them for CoNsIsTeNcY.Different writers all use the same cosmology. Don't mistake different writers as different canons
I don't understand you sorry?Will this help everyone?
Oh sorry its my mistake. I replied to you but I addressed everyone.I don't understand you sorry?
Oh OK then.Oh sorry its my mistake. I replied to you but I addressed everyone.
I was trying to use what you said about causality if it would help answer my question.
Depends on what you mean by "cosmology". Yes, they all take place within the same franchise and some events connect, but to say that huge parts of the cosmology haven't been changed depending om who's writing it is simply dishonest. The origin of the monitors has been changed 3 times iirc, as well as the creator of the multiverse, and Mandrakk's fate.Different writers all use the same cosmology. Don't mistake different writers as different canons
Prove itDepends on what you mean by "cosmology". Yes, they all take place within the same franchise and some events connect, but to say that huge parts of the cosmology haven't been changed depending om who's writing it is simply dishonest. The origin of the monitors has been changed 3 times iirc, as well as the creator of the multiverse, and Mandrakk's fate.