- 451
- 290
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
DBS Half 2-C
- Thread starter Ganasto
- Start date
- 7,686
- 1,380
From what I’ve heard it’s because Beerus and Champa were each contributing half the power necessary for a shockwave that would have destroyed two universes at once. So they don’t have multipliers upscaling from low 2-C, but have divisors back scaling from baseline 2-C.
You technically can reach 2-C from low 2-C by multipliers, it’s just completely unquantifiable what multiplier would be needed, so we basically assume no low 2-C is close to 2-C unless it’s through back scaling.
You technically can reach 2-C from low 2-C by multipliers, it’s just completely unquantifiable what multiplier would be needed, so we basically assume no low 2-C is close to 2-C unless it’s through back scaling.
- 451
- 290
- Thread starter
- #3
So you could divide 2-C in half but can't multiply Low 2-C by 2 to get 2-C even though multiplication is just the inverse, maybe i'm understanding wrong, but now I kind of think the feat is 2-C
- 7,686
- 1,380
Basically, it is possible to multiply power from low 2-C to 2-C and divide from 2-C to low 2-C, we just don’t know how much is necessary to close the gap. Because of this, we never assume a multiplier or chain from baseline low 2-C is enough to reach 2-C without concrete proof within the series, because it could just as easily be a 16x gap as a googolplexian times gap. Looking at it from the other end though, since we don’t know if the gap is finite or infinite, we take the assumption that results in the lower rating, which is that it’s finite, and therefore dividing by a finite amount places them in the high end of low 2-C rather than lower in 2-C.
- 451
- 290
- Thread starter
- #5
Oh ok I get it now thanks for explaining
- 451
- 290
- Thread starter
- #6
Actually since you technically can get to 2-C via multipliers, but the multiplier needed is unknown, if one could prove that for example UBW Jiren is 2x stronger than Beerus, would that make Jiren 2-C since Beerus is half 2-C?
- 16,968
- 11,315
Yes, if we have proofs of jiren being 2x stronger, yes, which is the reason that Angels are 2-C, because they are 2x stronger than Beerus and Champa
- 451
- 290
- Thread starter
- #8
Alright ty
- 8,874
- 5,709
Apparently, the DBS god tiers are not considered half 2-C anymore and instead "unquantifiably below 2-C", that's because they used were gonna use a combination attack to perform that feat and the multiplier page says about combination attacks "It should not be assumed that a combination attack performed by multiple characters has Attack Potency equal to the sum of the participating characters Attack Potency unless there is specific evidence for it.", which is imo bullshit, it should be the opposite and instead it should be assumed that a combination attack should scale to the sum of the participating characters unless proven otherwise, and this is also inconsistent since the angels are still rated 2-C for scaling above beerus and champa combined, as well as the feat was performed as a mere side effect of their fight so their total power should scale above this feat on it's own.
