-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
What Resistance Would This Be?
- Thread starter RitsuØ1
- Start date
- 1,015
- 1,300
- Thread starter
- #3
I don't think it is flowery language. Subtilizer was described as a void and a black hole and is made out of some sort of "Amorphous Darkness" that he can control to his will and has a weapon called a Void Blade. Absorption is already written on his profile. Not sure if that helped, but I also have another quote if it can help:
- 20,280
- 22,357
Yes, good enough absorption can do that.
- 1,015
- 1,300
- Thread starter
- #7
OK. I guess this is Absorption then.
- 20,280
- 22,357
How did you get that? If I absorb the totality of a thing, I have absorption. That's all, despite me having consumed its existence by definition.
My_area
He/Him- 1,239
- 554
If someone's existence is consumed not just their bodies that means it implies that not only their body but their existence is gone too.Since consuming a person doesn't mean their existence is consumed unless its consumption as in making them part of the void which absorbed them then your point makes sense
Anyways I changed my mind now,I now think its absorption+EE
- 20,280
- 22,357
And why would this be existence erasure? Absorbing your mind, body and soul means I've consumed your conventional existence. I haven't erased it anymore than physical absorption means I've used deconstruction on one's body.
My_area
He/Him- 1,239
- 554
Because your existence as in state of living is consumed and gone completely leaving nothing behind which should be a step above sub atomization ie existence erasure unless the person was consumed and made part of the void completely then it wouldn't be EE.Just consuming the person while person is still inside means that person's existence is still there and it isn't consumed.Consuming the existence as while not just combining the person into themselves means their existence was eaten and its gone hence its not there meaning it points towards EE if you are getting what I am saying.
- 20,280
- 22,357
That makes no sense. I dont have break down or do away with someone's existence if I consume it. They could still be in there and the statement "his existence is consumed" would be completely valid.
Again, that would be like claiming deconstruction if someone is stated to "consume their bodies". That's ridiculous and just a way to exaggerate flowery language.
Again, that would be like claiming deconstruction if someone is stated to "consume their bodies". That's ridiculous and just a way to exaggerate flowery language.
My_area
He/Him- 1,239
- 554
If the existence is consumed that means its devoured and that its not there.If existence is still there then the statement of "existence being consumed" simply makes no sense since person is being consumed not their existence.
That example doesn't work since body being consumed while still remaining as it is makes logical sense but the existence being consumed while still being there doesn't make sense.Existence isn't some physical body which can be consumed yet it remains like how physical body would.If its flowery langauge then it has to be demonstrated as such,if its sucessfully proven as being flowery langauge then thats fine.
- 20,280
- 22,357
If I eat the totality of an object, I ate its existence. An object and its existence aren't exclusive things, I have no idea why this is so rampant.
So yeah, consuming a person does mean you consume their existence. I don't know why people seem to think that existence is something esoteric in comparison to an object.
So yeah, consuming a person does mean you consume their existence. I don't know why people seem to think that existence is something esoteric in comparison to an object.
- 395
- 428
Is there any context saying that the thing remains fine inside? Because if it get's dissipated that sounds like it could qualify for EE if not deconstruction?
- 395
- 428
What's this from?
- 395
- 428
Probably the best move here would to get more context.
My_area
He/Him- 1,239
- 554
If you ate the totality of the object and its still there inside then you just consumed the object not its existence.Object as its own material form while existence refers to as state of living,so eating the object doesn't mean that its state of living is consumed,its not physical.
Consuming a person means you consumed the material structure of the person not the existence coorelated to the person itself unless person is dead hence the existence of said person vanishes.Existence is linked to object in sense of just their living state.
Its from Sword Art Online but as for context I am not sure,you have to ask the op about that.But yeah we can definitely wait for more context I guess
My_area
He/Him- 1,239
- 554
I dont understand how consuming the physical body of a person(provided they aren't killed) is same as consuming the state of living ie existence of a being?The link of existence and being is only to the part of their living.
I dont feel so strongly about it right now.Just decided to converse with you since you decided to question my argument which in turn could help me make a more solid opinion on what the ability is.But as agreed,without context its hard to analyze
Similar threads
