• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Vision Upgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.
I suppose that this seems reasonable, as long as the calculation was accepted.
 
Looks like a good boost to me. IDk if it's been accepted there or not. Maybe it'll be good to check the OBD scale if they listed there and, if more securable, ask a couple calf members to view this bit?
 
Well, I think that we can use it then, and likely scale all Marvel characters of class 50 and upwards from it, unless they have greater feats.
 
So everyone will scale from Vision and not Carol Danvers right? Can I preform the upgrade?
 
My apologies. I checked out the feat, and it was not lifting strength that you meant, but rather raw energy.

In addition, the feat was not performed via his regular blows, but by dropping from a mile above the ground at maximum density.

I think that we can continue to scale his regular statistics as 7-B from Carol Danvers, while also listing the 7-A statistics as: "Mountain level by dropping from a mile above the ground at maximum density".
 
However, we obviously cannot scale any other characters from this.
 
Why is Carol Danvers rated as 7-B, the amount of nuclear power she is equivalent to is unclear.
 
Well, it seemed like a reasonable "average" value, in lack of better options, as we had to scale from something.
 
Have you applied the changes?
 
Okay. Thanks. So, should I close this thread then?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top