-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Pokémon P&A revision
- Thread starter Drite77
- Start date
- 10,066
- 5,309
I'm fairly sure that the only reason people haven't done that yet is because everyone is still under the notion that Pokemon should only have moves that they naturally learn without human influence, unless they are specialty moves such as Blast Burn or Dragon Ascent.
That, and...everyone forgot, probably. I know I did.
Still, due to the nature of being composite, I'm still fine with this being a focal point to add to the various profiles. It's just...gonna take a bit to fully accomplish. I should probably revive or renew my Pokemon revision and cleanup thread and include this issue, along with the other issues that still need to be sorted out with the Pokemon profiles.
That, and...everyone forgot, probably. I know I did.
Still, due to the nature of being composite, I'm still fine with this being a focal point to add to the various profiles. It's just...gonna take a bit to fully accomplish. I should probably revive or renew my Pokemon revision and cleanup thread and include this issue, along with the other issues that still need to be sorted out with the Pokemon profiles.
- 4,187
- 1,484
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1082613
- 10,066
- 5,309
Only allowing TM and Tutor moves as long as it's specified could work, imo.NeoZex6399 said:
They could be separated from the standard movepool and set in a separate tabber right on the page, like other characters that have optional equipment and the like.
Plus, it was well agreed upon in said thread, so I think this would be the optimal approach to this.
- 10,066
- 5,309
Yes, it probably should.
However, they should, again, be placed in the separate tabs like what has been done with Pokemon such as Parasect.
On that topic, every Pokemon should have said tabs on their profiles, since a lot of them don't at the moment. It will keep things neat and tidy on their profiles, and cut out a lot of the bloat that many people complain about on the profiles already. Also, tabs for the powers and abilities of each evolution, such as what's been done with Pokemon like Lucario, would also be good to standardize for the Pokemon profiles.
However, they should, again, be placed in the separate tabs like what has been done with Pokemon such as Parasect.
On that topic, every Pokemon should have said tabs on their profiles, since a lot of them don't at the moment. It will keep things neat and tidy on their profiles, and cut out a lot of the bloat that many people complain about on the profiles already. Also, tabs for the powers and abilities of each evolution, such as what's been done with Pokemon like Lucario, would also be good to standardize for the Pokemon profiles.
- 10,066
- 5,309
- 10,066
- 5,309
Once we manage to draft the TM and Tutor moves to the site, I feel like an "Others" tab for those remaining moves can be applied as well.
- 10,066
- 5,309
I am not sure. You should probably ask someone with more editing experience than I.
- 4,187
- 1,484
bump
- 12,562
- 2,518
Here's a list of everything that needs to be done with Pokemon profiles. Let me know if I missed anything:
- All fully evolved Pokemon get Relavistic+ speed
- All second stage Pokemon become High 7-C and get Massively Hypersonic+ speed. Justification changes from seismic toss to Piplup's feat and being faster than first stage Pokemon respectively.
- Powers and Abilities need to be formatted properly
- IQ skills should be added to the P&A section of gens 1-4 Pokemon. I'll add the IQ skills of each group to my blog for convenience.
- Abilities that aren't explained in P&A should be explained. For example, Porygon up until a few days ago had unexplained Immortality Type 2.
- Given that its been discussed multiple times, Non-Physical Interaction should be added to every Pokemon profile, bar a few special cases.
- Pre-evolutions should be added to profiles
- Pokemon should have a tabber for their shiny picture as well. For these two, Gengar is a recent example.
- Standard Tactics could be added where applicable
- 10,423
- 4,066
@Gyro Nutz: It may help to link the relevant feat calculations in that list, to make sure they're approved for use & can readily be considered in these revisions.
Also, link to your blog?
Anyway, among that list what does everyone agree on? I think we should add that first, then go over points of debate on what we may not agree on the inclusion of as much.
Also, link to your blog?
Anyway, among that list what does everyone agree on? I think we should add that first, then go over points of debate on what we may not agree on the inclusion of as much.
- 12,562
- 2,518
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:GyroNutz/Pokemon_Mystery_Dungeon_-_Item_%2B_Abilities_Explanatio
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:GyroNutz/Piplup's_Whirlpool
The first one is the IQ explanation blog, the second one is the High 7-C calc second stages scale to. The only stat that I haven't seen an evaluated blog for is the lifting strength (based off of HM strength, Mantyke has an evaluated lifting strength feat)
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:GyroNutz/Piplup's_Whirlpool
The first one is the IQ explanation blog, the second one is the High 7-C calc second stages scale to. The only stat that I haven't seen an evaluated blog for is the lifting strength (based off of HM strength, Mantyke has an evaluated lifting strength feat)
- 1,971
- 169
I remember that someone here was working on adding all the Gen 1 Pokemon.
- 1,971
- 169
Something about Thunder Wave.Imaginym said:
- 12,562
- 2,518
Fully Evolved Pokemon can dodge light based moves. Solarbeam met several light standards (being reflected, activated solar panels, light statements) as did Signal Beam (stated to be light, comes from a natural light source being bioluminescence).Imaginym said:
Second Stage Pokemon scale above first stage Pokemon, who can dodge lightning, which is mach 1.1k
- 168,586
- 77,401
@GyroNutz
You should ask the staff members listed in the Knowledgeable Members List and the Pokémo verse page to comment here to evaluate your suggested changes.
You should ask the staff members listed in the Knowledgeable Members List and the Pokémo verse page to comment here to evaluate your suggested changes.
- 10,423
- 4,066
I forget: Was it decided on, a while back, in a previous revision thread, that, with some exceptions where a certain stage is exceptionally notable, the tabbers of pre-evolutions on Pokemon profiles should be first, so as to be consistent with the ordering of the Keys & most profiles on the Wiki listing a character's base form first?
A little off-topic, though, & of course, if there's any contention about implementing this, it should be discussed after approved revisions are implemented, so as not to slow the revision process.
A little off-topic, though, & of course, if there's any contention about implementing this, it should be discussed after approved revisions are implemented, so as not to slow the revision process.
- 12,562
- 2,518
- 10,423
- 4,066
I wholeheartedly agree, hence my stating that the matter about tabber order should be discussed after approved revisions. Although, in hindsight, I suppose "approved revisions" wasn't inclusive of all the numerous matters more important than tabber order. XDGyroNutz said:
I'll assume I should withhold my opinion on how tabbers should be ordered for the time being.
- 1,971
- 169
I'm going to throw my two cents into the order of the Tabbers. It makes sense to put the lowest level first.
Similar threads
