• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports - 46

Status
Not open for further replies.

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
He/Him
VS Battles
Head Bureaucrat
Bureaucrat
Administrator
167,676
76,256
Please report any rule violations in this thread. Notifying us of such incidents is highly appreciated.

Additionally, kindly report any sockpuppets that you come across.

Only report violations regarding the wiki rules. False reports due to personal vendettas are unacceptable.

Also, this thread should be for reporting actual rule-breaking, not every single little disagreement.

In cases of extreme vandalism or trolling, you can report the accounts at the VSTF wiki.

If blocked members create sockpuppet accounts to circumvent their block repetitively, or several are created at almost the same time, you may contact the Fandom Staff, to politely request permanent range IP blocks.

You can also find specific users with the Search Function by typing with the format: "User:Username"

Here is a useful page for discovering sockpuppet accounts: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Log/newusers

Notes:

All staff members, kindly follow and bookmark this thread.

Remember to inform members via their message walls if that you have reported them here, in case they have performed severe enough rule-violations to risk being blocked. However, this should only be used in uncertain cases, not if they have done something instantly ban worthy, or if their offenses are minor.

It is against the Fandom rules to upload any offensive images to the wiki, so in order to show screencapture evidence of extremely bad behaviour, you must use external sites, such as Gyazo or Imgur, in order to not get globally banned yourself by the higher-ups:

https://gyazo.com

https://imgur.com/

https://imageshack.us

Do not derail the Rule Violation Threads with irrelevant nonsense or internal disputes. It is solely for making serious, warranted reports of violations of the Site, Discussio, and Editing Rules, and not for discussion or side comments. Such posts should preferably be removed by the staff, and if a member continues to derail after being repeatedly told to stop, this will result in a temporary ban.

Given the extreme levels of systematic harrassment towards this community, kindly remember to not share/post any evidence of malware or child abuse publicly in order to prevent unwillful distribution. Submit any evidence of child abuse and severe systematic threats to the police.

If something goes outside the jurisdiction of the VS Battles wiki bureaucrats, or even the global Fandom staff, you need to report it personally to the authorities.

Also, absolutely do not click on any random links from suspicious users. You could potentially access content that contains dangerous malware or illegal types of pornography.

However, do not feed the trolls by discussing their behaviour here, as they get excited and motivated by any form of attention. Strictly report them to the staff, who then block them and mass-delete their contributions.
 
Continued from here: https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2698035
 
Okay.
 
Given that hes been acting like this in multiple threads for a very, very long time, he may need something more than just a warning

Just saying
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Given that hes been acting like this in multiple threads for a very, very long time, he may need something more than just a warning

Just saying
Coming from the guy who tried to get me banned. So there's that context.
 
When admins are refusing to consider evidence given to them to further theirown fantasies over and over again, it's a little difficult to stay calm.
 
RegisNex1232 said:
When admins are refusing to consider evidence given to them to further theirown fantasies over and over again, it's a little difficult to stay calm.
Everything you say is like it's by default in the endgame where you are definitively right.

And that having a different opinion is inherently wrong.

That's not a problem of the admins. That's a problem intrinsically tied to your personality.
 
Dargoo Faust said:
To be entirely fair it's not as if Regis was the only one heated on that thread. Some comments from you and Weekly could have definitely been worded more respectfully, no offense.
This is a repeated pattern from regis that has happened for years and is showing no signs of changing
 
RegisNex1232 said:
When admins are refusing to consider evidence given to them to further theirown fantasies over and over again, it's a little difficult to stay calm.
Oh for the love of...

You've refused to listen to other peoples opinions and acted needlessly aggressive on many, many occasions. That is why you've been reported at least 5 times by my count, not as some grand conspiracy by people who "further theirown fantasies" as you (again, needlessly) aggressively put it.
 
Having an incorrect opinion that evidence and fscts don't support, then sticking with it and acting like someone who understands the verse when it's not even true is grating. And you've personally been wrong too much for anyone to take your word in this topic.
 
Not listening to opinions disproven by the text is bad now? Especially when they come from someone who is by all past evidence not reliable in this topic?
 
Matthew Schroeder said:
Again, you assert a different opinion as heresy and your own as a fact carved into stone by God Himself.
Again, a different opinion is incorrect when the evidence to support is is not there. Something ypu keep ignoring.
 
Regis, just shut up. I get it, it can feel like the people you're arguing with are stupid when they don't agree with what you think are very obvious points. I've been there, I've felt that. But that doesn't excuse throwing a tantrum like a child. You can respectfully disagree with a certain rating or viewpoint all you want but you don't. You whine and moan and complain. We've done this song and dance ten times now because you refuse to grow up and as someone who makes it a point to follow all the rule violation reports threads, I'm sick if it.
 
Anyone mind telling me what exactly Regis has done? I fail to see anything seriously noteworthy other than "making shit up", which isn't even that bad

I personally don't know Regis, but I can relate to his over zealous will

Idk about his past behavior sonmind giving me a recap?
 
Konaguna said:
Anyone mind telling me what exactly Regis has done? I fail to see anything seriously noteworthy other than "making shit up", which isn't even that bad
A long history of holding grudges against particular users (Notably) Weekly that stretches back about a year or so, in numerous threads, and like 6 different individual reports all resulting in warnings and / or Regis coming to the RV thread to argue and derailing it all.

Honestly, nothing will change in the long run just from yet another warning. I advocate for a temporary ban.

And as First Witch said above, that's all this discussion will have him. If you're not staff don't post nor stretch this discussion. Replies should be in regards to my proposition only.
 
I disagree with a temporary ban. People have done worse and didn't even get a warning at all.
 
I disagree with banning Regis for several reasons, the largest being hypocrisy.

Regis doesn't actually break any rules here. He doesn't overuse profanities, he doesn't use slurs and he doesn't actually attack another user. After Ctrl+F his comments, I don't see anything by Regis that warrants a ban. Although he does seem hot-headed and could help himself by lowering the tone you get from his words; however, this leads to hypocrisy since Regis isn't the only in the thread like this.

It'd be rather hypocritical to ban him for his temperament when he's not the only one in that thread acting brash, which Dargoo pointed out above. The lbiggest proponent for banning him seems to stem from his history of being reported, need I remind people that we have staff that get reported every other day for the same reasom and are let off with warnings? It's hypocritical to act here for one user out of all in that thread and hypocritical to act on this user when there others being reported for the same reasons dozens of times in a few months.

I don't agree with a ban for anyone in that thread, including Regis, but I do advise all parties in that thread to chill out and just remember we're arguing about fictional characters. A warning to all parties for acting with a tone is the only reasonable punishment I see, no rules were broken. Take a break if you all need to.
 
I see Made's point, and while I think that the other members who get continually reported should have just been temporarily banned themselves (or at least had their staff privileges temporarily revoked or something), his seems like a reasonable compromise.
 
"Regis doesn't actually break any rules here. He doesn't overuse profanities, he doesn't use slurs and he doesn't actually attack another user"

This is completely ignoring all past infractions and reports, as well as the reasons for the continuing criticism Regis has received over the past year or more. It is basically isolating that one thread of all context.

Nevertheless, one quickly realizes that it is Regis who initiated conflict in that thread, as he tends to do on all others he partakes and causes conflict with. You cannot even argue that he an Weekly were on an equal field, as sometimes happen, as the later was barely in the thread itself.

I still advocate for his ban based on his continued misbehavior which makes me completely certain that a single "harsh warning" (Means nothing really when we just give warnings over and over to the same person) won't change a thing.
 
Prior history shouldn't be something that gets you banned for being heated on a thread. I disapprove of anything other than a warning to be generally more polite, but that same warning should be applied to everyone who participated in the back and forth. I saw no malicious targeting and harassment, just a debate that got intense, with a few accusations of motivation and knowledge on the verse thrown both sides.

I'd also like specific examples of what Regis said on the thread that was against the rules proper, please drop them on my wall so this doesn't eat a chunk out of the RVRT.
 
Prior history should absolutely be factored into these decisions because it establishes context. Context that he refuses to calm down and stop treating staff members like the bad guys because they disagree with his posts.

I don't think he should be banned for this incident, either, but constant offenses will eventually have to be punished.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top