• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Large size type question

Status
Not open for further replies.
ProspectX

ProspectX

1,096
94
Hm, this page is for the use of comparison between size, correct? Why is there a type for entities who fundamentally transcend the concept of size/dimensions to begin with? You can't say a metaphysical object is "larger" than another, because it's meaningless at that level.
 
Presumably because they transcend the concept of size, but I suppose that you have a point.
 
There's no meaning to apply a mathematical concept to something metaphysical. For the reason that you cannot disavow the very first principle of a Outerverse; beyond the concepts of space-time.

Every possible conceptualization of space-time includes largeness, smallness, bigness, etc, and even infinity for that matter.
 
Okay. You can ask Azathoth and some administrators to contribute to this thread. If they agree, we can probably get rid of the classification.
 
There is no true "size" for those who are beyond space itself. To have a size, you must reside within a spatial structure. If you're transcendent of it, you have no size.
 
Yes, we should probably get rid of the classification then. Would you be willing to check for 1-A profiles that have it listed, and remove it there as well?
 
Okay. Thank you for the help. I will remove the "beyond the concept of size" category from the Large Size page then.
 
I'm currently looking through the Large Size category for 1-As. So far only Cthulhu Mythos characters had it.
 
I have searched through the Large Size category and the only 1-As there were the Ultimate Gods and Yog-Soggoth, who I changed.
 
Okay. Thanks again. Should we close this thread?
 
Nothing left to say other than thanks to you both, it's appreciated.

The thread can be closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Flashlight237
Large Size Calculations Change
Replies
32
Views
4K
Omnificence
Omnificence
Caleb1775
Adding more examples for Acausality, Small Size, and Large Size
Replies
0
Views
646
Caleb1775
Caleb1775
SukunaEditz
Why does Unicron have type 4 Acausality, but says he exists beyond cause and effect?
Replies
2
Views
928
SukunaEditz
SukunaEditz
Idontknow350
Liopleurodon should reach large size type 0
Replies
3
Views
671
Idontknow350
Idontknow350
ArachDusa
Would destroying Jupiter be a 5-A+ feat?
Replies
1
Views
2K
KLOL506
KLOL506
Back
Top