That's not proof of literal 3-A destruction. Goku saved the universe when he defeated Frieza the first time,
Kyubey saves the universe by combatting entropy, etc.
The statement is referencing this^ no? If so, the same thing falls here.
Yes, but the actual consequences / context (Such as his attempt to destroy Earth / Using a satelite) aren't AP based, much less 3-A destruction. It'll be like scaling people with universal hax / range to AP.
Despite it being stated that half the universe belongs to the Darkness and the other belongs to the light? You want to argue that the Darkness controls the whole universe and the Light is outside of it? You're doing is at best, mentioning how inconsistent the verse can be and at worst proving flowery language is heavily relevant.
- Let's assume this is to be taken seriously, however.
- Since the Light is outside the universe, all my previous statements change from hax to ranged hax.
- The question becomes, why couldn't he just AP bombard from a distance? At least before you could argue that the Gentle Darkness protected its half.
- Furthermore, assuming the "destroyed the universe several times before" statement is legit, then the Gentle Darkness would have been eradicated several times before. Lifewiping explains how the Darkness would still exist and how the universe hasn't physically been destroyed already.
Neo Space was explicitly shown and stated to orbit Jupiter. If its constantly refered to as a universe, then that would mean that in this context, a universe doesn't necessarily have to be the same size as the actual universe. Ie, like how planets or stars vary in shape. All you're doing is proving the statements need an absurd amount of context and that the literal irl definition doesn't always apply.
Like I mention, best you get is smaller pocket dimensions with a loose definition of 'universe'. Timelines smaller than universe size is tiered as unqualifable, ie like the Hyperbolic Time Chamber.