- 22,708
- 23,292
Someone should edit in the gif and image to justify the ratings for the Mark I and Mark II-V
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Yet another MCU CRT
- Thread starter Schnee_One
- Start date
- 63,529
- 8,508
- Thread starter
- #82
Good point
It was the scene in the cave before he shows the plans for MK1 That he says its 3 Gigawatts
It was the scene in the cave before he shows the plans for MK1 That he says its 3 Gigawatts
- 63,529
- 8,508
- Thread starter
- #83
- 22,708
- 23,292
- 63,529
- 8,508
- Thread starter
- #85
The profiles are open so you can help as well
I'll ask for just a bit more input
I'll ask for just a bit more input
- 10,392
- 3,347
So... can someone summarize this?
I will say that Wall level Mark V is stupid, though.
I will say that Wall level Mark V is stupid, though.
- 11,099
- 4,326
This is already concluded I think.
- 22,708
- 23,292
The Mark I is now building level for having a 3 Gigajoule reactor and the Mark II-V/Whiplash/Iron Monger are Building Level+ for having a 8 Gigajoule reactor.The Everlasting said:
I would like it if a mod/someone who has access to the Iron Man page would edit in the above scans as AP justifcations though
- 63,529
- 8,508
- Thread starter
- #89
Now I think that Iron Spider should scale to Mark 2-5
On top of this, the middle feat might need to be calced, might be good, might not be.
On top of this, the middle feat might need to be calced, might be good, might not be.
- 63,529
- 8,508
- Thread starter
- #90
The Mark I is now building level for having a 3 Gigajoule reactor and the Mark II-V/Whiplash/Iron Monger are Building Level+ for having a 8 Gigajoule reactor.
I would like it if a mod/someone who has access to the Iron Man page would edit in the above scans as AP justifcations though
The profiles are unlocked you can do it yourself.
I would like it if a mod/someone who has access to the Iron Man page would edit in the above scans as AP justifcations though
The profiles are unlocked you can do it yourself.
- 63,529
- 8,508
- Thread starter
- #91
Also I just noticed something
Iron Man's High Hypersonic rating comes from a feat in Iron Man 3 with an 8A suit.
Not sure if that should backwards scale.
Iron Man's High Hypersonic rating comes from a feat in Iron Man 3 with an 8A suit.
Not sure if that should backwards scale.
- 63,529
- 8,508
- Thread starter
- #93
Yeah, 8A suits I can accept High Hypersonic but 8C suits need a different speed.
Could that feat in IM 1 be calced? Where he flew to the Ivey atmosphere?
Could that feat in IM 1 be calced? Where he flew to the Ivey atmosphere?
Similar threads
