Why?

[Orange]

If you can resist an EE that completely erasing every part of your body from existence. Wouldn't you get resistance to attacks that directly harms your Atoms no?

 

[Blahblah9755]

You don’t resist abilities based on what it targets, you resist it based on how it works. So since the mechanics of erasing the body and destroying the body’s atoms are different, they wouldn’t share the same resistance.

 

[Orange]

But isn't erasing the body better than just targeting it's atoms.
You only directly damage the atom, while in EE you outright erase them, turn them into nothing, they no longer exist in reality

 

[Bernkastelll]

If you can resist an EE that completely erasing every part of your body from existence. Wouldn't you get resistance to attacks that directly harms your Atoms no?

Not sure about that, if an physical attack destroy atoms, being able to resist EE isnt the same, in the same way that resisting EE doesnt means that someone cant be one shotted by AP alone

 

[Blahblah9755]

If they’re working under completely different mechanics, there’s no reason to assume the same metric can judge their respective potencies, or that the same defenses will work against both mechanics.

 

[Orange]

So if like surfing an attack that erases your body completely out of existence and reality, including your atoms, quarks and stuff. Yet it won't give resistance to an attack that only targets or destroys your atoms? Sounds hella weird tbh

 

[BluudyManikin777]

Existence Erasure is not a strength dependent attack, and works no matter the durability, (as long as they don’t have resistance or do have the same existence level as the attack) and leaves absolutely nothing behind. While brute force attacks, such as energy waves, still leave the opponent’s body incinerated into incredibly small pieces, and needs to be superior in strength to do any significant damage. In conclusion, they work entirely different. So, resistance to one doesn’t mean resistance to the other