- 12,725
- 4,914
What I saw is different, the argument shown is the same repeated over and over, and everyone is tired to deal with them.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Why Is Goku Black Only 3-A????
- Thread starter PLNate
- Start date
- Status
- 15,727
- 10,434
- 24,344
- 25,249
They weren't going to destroy time and space, they were only gonna destroy space
- 15,727
- 10,434
wrong arguments that ppl usually bring to DBX and SDBH: demigra transcend space and time, Game World, COT and others shit, however, mine 7-D to 9-D scale to DB is differwnt
- 4,466
- 378
i think that destroying it physcically with punches is probably 3-A? pretty sure you need feats of destroying both spacetime
- 4,466
- 378
Can anyone explain to me how macrocosm is 1-C? irwk
- 8,852
- 5,688
Well they clearly said they were going to destroy u7 into nothing, how would we know whether they meant the space-time or not?
- 4,466
- 378
they NEED meant that they destroyed the space time in order to get Low 2-C. or just destroyed those 3 spatial + 1 temporal dimensions
- 24,344
- 25,249
It needs to be more explicit that they're gonna destroy time and space, if it's just destroying the universe, than it's automatically just 3-A
- 12,522
- 3,489
They mentioned turning Universe 7 into an empty void which implies just physical matter being destroyed.
- 15,727
- 10,434
Void Hax tho
- 8,852
- 5,688
Well why was zamasu fusing with U7 considered low 2-C, And why is zeno destroying the multiverse 2-C? They never said they were gonna erase the "space-time continuum", they said they were gonna destroy the "universe(s)".
- 24,344
- 25,249
Because Zamasu fused with space and time, and Zeno destroyed multiple space time continuums and the 12 universes are considered to Low 2-C each.
- 12,725
- 4,914
Based on the fact that they enter in these realms. Debunk the realms being higher D = debunk Demigra being higher D as well.
- 15,727
- 10,434
if im not wrong, all universes in DB are 1 timeline, so, Zeno feat is Low 2-C only
- 24,344
- 25,249
I swear to god we have this same discourse every month or so and it's always about dragonball.
- 8,852
- 5,688
But they said zamasu was fusing with the universe not the space-time continuum bruh, and if zeno destroying a universe is low 2-C then why TF is goku destroying the universe NOT low 2-C?
- 24,344
- 25,249
Because he has no statements of destroying space and time? Why is that so hard to understand? Why are people always asking this?
- 15,727
- 10,434
Zamasu body affected the present timeline and he took all the future timeline, a proof of it is because zeno needed to erase the entire timeline to erase zamasu, since, he become it.
- 8,852
- 5,688
Okay that's a good answer, I promise I already know this but I was genuinely curious since I see these arguments all the time. Ok I have other questions, when zeno is erasing the universes individually in the TOP is it considered low 2-C and why? The other question, why is beerus and champa destroying 2 universes 2-C and not 3-A?
- 15,727
- 10,434
Dunno about Zeno stuff on this case, but Beerus and Champa feat should be 3-A only, yes
- 9,226
- 3,367
lol
- 4,466
- 378
Zeno destroyed different universe dividied by (whatever is dividied) so it's automatically 2-C
IZ is 2-C because affected the future, another space time. that's enough
- 10,332
- 4,442
The unknown reasoning for 1-C by Bernkastelll one.
- 15,727
- 10,434
No, IZ is Low 2-C due becoming the timeline, the ''eventually will become 2-C '' rating comes from because he was going to take all Timelines if zeno didnt erased him
- 8,852
- 5,688
I think it has to do with the distance between the two universes right? like because they're both low 2-C so they are separated that's why they get 2-C?
- 15,727
- 10,434
Zeno 2-C rating doesnt comes only from it, it also comes from the statement that he could destroy the entire multiverse, which has different timelines, as shown in the time rings
- 4,466
- 378
yes but the Low 2-C comes frome here going to affect the future. because it prove that IZ was affecting the whole space time
- 12,522
- 3,489
DB’s multiverse is a quilted one so yeah, it should only be 3-A.
- 15,727
- 10,434
He did took all the future, this is how the Low 2-C IZ comes from, the eventually 2-C comes because he was going to took all timelines, not only the future
- 10,332
- 4,442
You and Bernkastelll are talking next to each other. I baselessly assumed his/her arguments are something I’ve seen before, it turned out if wasn’t. Thus it turns out it’s (very likely) something you haven’t seen before either.
- 24,344
- 25,249
I thought quilted multiverses are High 3-A?
- 8,852
- 5,688
I meant the beerus and champa feat.
- 4,466
- 378
I agree, DBS mutiverse during Future timeline arc is proved that there isn't any dimensional barrier or something.
But with it i can still made a Low 2-C to 2-C argument for them
But with it i can still made a Low 2-C to 2-C argument for them
- 4,466
- 378
ye ik, that's what i meant
- 4,466
- 378
wdym with "quilted"?
- 1,626
- 146
Its literally a different space with a different flow of time, proving that its separated by space time
- 12,522
- 3,489
Not if there’s a finite amount of universes.
- 15,727
- 10,434
literally on our IRL universe, the time flow different if we are close from an object with a rlly high mass like black holes, having different flow of times doesnt means different space-time continuum
- 12,522
- 3,489
Multiple universal bodies of space that all exist within the same space-time continuum.
- Status
Similar threads
