- 1,292
- 346
A realm (A) is said to encompass another smaller realm (B).
B is stated to have an infinite number of infinitely-sized layers.
A encompasses all of them, and cannot be accessed by going though all infinite layers; it is beyond the entire scope of B entirely and B exists as a small fragment embedded inside the structure of A (which is also infinite in scale).
So B is an infinite realm embedded inside A, which is another infinite realm, as a mere fragment.
If a layer is Low 2-C, then B should be 2-A as it contains infinite Low 2-C layers.
But what about A? Would it be at least 2-A or Low 1-C?
B is stated to have an infinite number of infinitely-sized layers.
A encompasses all of them, and cannot be accessed by going though all infinite layers; it is beyond the entire scope of B entirely and B exists as a small fragment embedded inside the structure of A (which is also infinite in scale).
So B is an infinite realm embedded inside A, which is another infinite realm, as a mere fragment.
If a layer is Low 2-C, then B should be 2-A as it contains infinite Low 2-C layers.
But what about A? Would it be at least 2-A or Low 1-C?
Last edited: