No, it was rejected and now people are too tired to redo it again.
So, why would this be a good reason to ignore all the reasons why the feat is done through kinetic energy? This wouldn't disprove my argument, people are just too lazy to calculate it again.
Also your talking about the anime version of the feat, such a scene isn't in the manga. And using the anime gets complicated, as that's been both accepted and rejected I believe.
Using the anime is fine if it's not contradicted in the manga. It's been several times on the wiki, so this would be hypocrisy.
Here's the issue with anyone wanting to scale MHA any higher than 7-B at best, and even that i'm sure people want downgraded to 7-C at this point:
Endeavor takes hits from AFO Shiggy who can survive Deku's 100% hits, which is this verse's god tier. That contradicts Endeavor being inferior to All Might, and creates a scaling chain of people that also scale to it since Hood and the other High Ends are comparable and can hurt Endeavor.
Here's the problem. Hood isn't 7-C just because he's high-end, he's 7-C because he has an overpowered muscle augmentation quirk. Other high-ends aren't shown to have that. Like, sure. All of the Nomu's have some sort of augmented strength, but that augmented strength is usually only portrayed as
High 8-C. Examples like Hood or the USJ Nomu are far higher. And there isn't really an instance where a High-End hurts Endeavor unless their actually piercing him with a sharp object.
And then Endeavor is shown to easily be fended off by a casual All For One and gets manhandled by Shigaraki. He only stood a chance because of his quirk, combat experience, and the fact that Shigaraki's quirks clearly aren't relative to his ap. (Most of the time.) So, that would kind of contradict a lot of the scaling for 7-B Endeavor.
And the scaling chain would presume even if you count 7-B feats. What, are people going to try to downgrade MHA to 7-C? There are barely any 7-C feats to go off from and there are numerous 7-B ones. You do the math to find which is the most consistent out of all. We rate feats on this site based on consistency, NOT because of personal preference.
here's also the vocal part of the people on this site that believe movies should be claimed as non canon, regardless of any statements, cameos or evidence to suggest they are canon, because of the generally better feats that appear in them. So that's another point of contention for high tier scaling.
And we should accept their arguments? There's god knows how many statements at this point of Horikoshi confirming the canon of the movies. Their arguments should be irrelevant by now.
There's even an entire blog Rusty made with several statements confirming the movie's canon.
It gets to the point where we're are ignoring facts, logic, statements, (even the most obvious of obvious feats at this point) in favor of just headcanon. That is fallacious. No questions asked.