Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm including all cardinals (I mean all cardinals in math and physics)Are you including the limit and inaccessible cardinals here? Or just the successor cardinal of alephs?
Tüm kardinalleri dahil ediyorum (matematik ve fizikt
Aleph-Null = High 1-BI'm including all cardinals (I mean all cardinals in math and physi
According to this situation, does someone who surpasses mathematics get 0?(including physics)Aleph-Null = Yüksek 1-B
Aleph-1 = Düşük 1-A
Aleph-2 = Temel 1-A
Aleph-Omega = 1-A+
Erişilemeyen Kardinal = Temel Yüksek 1-A
Mahlo Kardinal = Temel 0
Zayıf Kompakt Kardinal=0+
Woodin Kardinal = 0^sonsuz
Berkeley Kardinali = 0^sonsuz
its trueBu duruma göre matematiği geçen biri 0 alır mı?(fizik dahil)
Hyper-Inaccessible is honestly enough for tier 0, mainly because a hyper-inaccessible views inaccessible the same way it views alephs.Aleph-Null = High 1-B
Aleph-1 = Low 1-A
Aleph-2 = Baseline 1-A
Aleph-Omega = 1-A+
İnaccesible Cardinal = Baseline High 1-A
Mahlo Cardinal = Baseline 0
Weakly Compact Cardinal=0+
Woodin Cardinal = 0^infinity
Berkeley Cardinal = 0^infinity
Physics doesn't really help as it's meant to abide from reallity.According to this situation, does someone who surpasses mathematics get 0?(including physics)
What do you mean by quantifying?Hyper-Inaccessible is honestly enough for tier 0, mainly because a hyper-inaccessible views inaccessible the same way it views alephs.
(Also it's better to put a S in the cardinals since they have more than one of them.....
I would also put another correction or atleast a opinion, I think weakly compact should be infinite layers to 0 as well mainly because even a hyper-mahlo views mahlo the same way it views inaccessible and the same way inaccessible views alephs.
And there's gonna be even more hyper-mahlo that is superior to the other yet below a weakly compact, like hyper-hyper-mahlo which views hyper-mahlo the same way it views mahlo.)
Though again you need a quantification of this things to reach the tiers not the concept of the number itself.
Atleast a quantification of those numbers.What do you mean by quantifying?
Normally how would certain fiction use cardinals to explain the size of their cosmology?I mean berkeley cardinals are not the biggest, they are just very strong.
I find ultrahuge to be one of the biggest.
And limit of berkeley cardinals exists also woodin koellners extendible is also a big one that should be bigger than atleast the least berkeley.
So berkeley's are like very strong and very big? But not really the biggest.
Can you elaborate a little?Normally how would certain fiction use cardinals to explain the size of their cosmology?
Such as SCP and world of darkness.Can you elaborate a little?
Saying something is infinite is already a common depiction don't you think?
Unless if you mean large cardinals or something along those lines which means you'd need to either batantly say their equation (or formulae) or say the axiom itself I don't think there is a simple breakdown there although I do have some ideas of wanking some fictional verses that have non math settings that can adhere to a reinhardt or things similar but some here does not follow vsbw standards so can't give you that idea as an example.
What about them?Such as SCP and world of darkness.
how did they use cardinals in their cosmology.What about them?
I mean really, you don't really just say there is a Berkeley cardinal amount of universes. That just sounds wrong and childish.Bro this is a verse question.
Ask it in the general discussion instead.
I see you are working hard and you should take a tea break at WoD cosmology crt because we have problem about set theory and use of axiom of choice. (zfc)Do you expect them to write the equation or the formula justifying it then?
I have some ideas of indirectly saying it but really by vsbw they will say it's assuming even if it's fitting.
yeah sureHello lewis. Mind sending the link?
I'll check a little later.
Thanks youI'll check a little later.
Why does the verse use transcend concept dimension plus support exceed infinite geometric patterns blah-blah. got tier 1A?Hyper-Inaccessible is honestly enough for tier 0, mainly because a hyper-inaccessible views inaccessible the same way it views alephs.
(Also it's better to put a S in the cardinals since they have more than one of them.....
I would also put another correction or atleast a opinion, I think weakly compact should be infinite layers to 0 as well mainly because even a hyper-mahlo views mahlo the same way it views inaccessible and the same way inaccessible views alephs.
And there's gonna be even more hyper-mahlo that is superior to the other yet below a weakly compact, like hyper-hyper-mahlo which views hyper-mahlo the same way it views mahlo.)
Though again you need a quantification of this things to reach the tiers not the concept of the number itself.
Strictly speaking, aleph-0 is a subset of aleph1, which can be defined by any mapping. In this case ℵ0 is a subset of P(ℵ0) because P(ℵ0) can contain infinitely many ℵ0s, which would make you P(ℵ0).The what now? I don't remember talking about concept of dimension.
Aleph-1 is just bigger than Aleph-0 it's not unreachable to it.
Bunu şu şekilde açıklayabilirim, eğer herhangi bir serideki ifadede aleph-0 kadar boyut varsa, bu o serideki tüm boyutları 2a yapar (temelde yani standart evrensel modelde her boyut 4d olarak karakterize edilirse) ), elbette bu minimum olarak gerçekleşir ve eğer bu boyutlar niteliksel olarak birbirini aşıyorsa bu, aleph-0 kadar boyut ifadesi ile h1b'ye kadar çıkar.Normalde bazı kurgular kozmolojilerinin büyüklüğünü açıklamak için kardinalleri nasıl kullanırdı?
Hayır, aslında hiper-erişilemez kardinal 0. seviye değil. Hiper-erişilemez kardinal, temel erişilemez kardinale göre hiper-uzatılmış bir sonsuzluğa sahiptir, bu yüzden aralarında sonsuz bir omega seviyesi olduğunu söyleyebilirim, tıpkı tıpkı güçsüz bir erişilmezi a seviyesi olarak alırız, hiper-erişilemez kardinalin, eğer erişilemez olana göre hiperölçekli bir sonsuzluk seviyesi varsa, bu erişilemez seviyede hala bir fark olduğu anlamına gelmez, sadece erişilemez bir kardinalin olduğu anlamına gelir, a ile gösterilen, erişilemeyen kardinal ile ilgili olarak k ile gösterilen (a<k'den beri) bir hiperseviyeye sahiptir. Aşırı erişilemez yalnızca sonsuz bir genişlemeye sahip olacaktır; bu, temel erişilemez ile hiper erişilemezin kardinalleri arasındaki farkın, iyi düzenin yalnızca sonsuz seviyesi olan omega olduğu anlamına gelir.Hiper-Erişilemez, açıkçası 0. seviye için yeterlidir, çünkü hiper-erişilemez görünümler, aleflerle aynı şekilde erişilemezdir.
(Ayrıca kardinallerde birden fazla olduğundan S harfi koymak daha iyidir.....
Ayrıca başka bir düzeltme veya en azından bir görüş koyacağım, zayıf kompaktın 0'a kadar sonsuz katmanlar olması gerektiğini düşünüyorum, çünkü bir hiper-mahlo bile mahlo'yu erişilemez olarak gördüğü gibi ve erişilemez alefleri aynı şekilde görüyor.
Ve hiper-mahlo'yu mahlo'ya baktığı gibi gören hiper-hiper-mahlo gibi, diğerinden üstün ancak zayıf kompaktlığın altında olan daha da fazla hiper-mahlo olacak.)
Yine de kademelere ulaşmak için sayı kavramına değil, bu şeylerin niceliğine ihtiyacınız var.
Aleph 1 is the superset of Aleph 0 and is in fact inaccessible with respect to it (unless you are talking about limit cardinals).The what now? I don't remember talking about concept of dimension.
Aleph-1 is just bigger than Aleph-0 it's not unreachable to it.
Herhangi bir asal sayıyı aşmak diye bir şey yoktur, o asal sayının miktarına eşdeğer bir boyutsal ölçeği, maddesel olmayan bir şekilde, yani r>f veya niteliksel aşkınlık vb. aşmanız gerekir ve bu, spesifik olarak yapılmalıdır. belirtildi (bu daha fazla ayrıntıya girmeden başka bir açıdan da olabilir)Herhangi bir kardinal sayıyı aşmayı mı kastediyorsun? Küçük ve büyük kardinal var mı???
Evet, sana 0. kademeyi verecek